Cargando…
Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience
BACKGROUND: Patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816 |
_version_ | 1785066742705291264 |
---|---|
author | Kohut, Kelly Morton, Kate Turner, Lesley Shepherd, Jonathan Fenerty, Vicky Woods, Lois Grimmett, Chloe Eccles, Diana M. Foster, Claire |
author_facet | Kohut, Kelly Morton, Kate Turner, Lesley Shepherd, Jonathan Fenerty, Vicky Woods, Lois Grimmett, Chloe Eccles, Diana M. Foster, Claire |
author_sort | Kohut, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes. METHODS: Systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience. RESULTS: Thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful. CONCLUSIONS: Decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10311450 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103114502023-07-01 Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience Kohut, Kelly Morton, Kate Turner, Lesley Shepherd, Jonathan Fenerty, Vicky Woods, Lois Grimmett, Chloe Eccles, Diana M. Foster, Claire Front Health Serv Health Services BACKGROUND: Patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes. METHODS: Systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience. RESULTS: Thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful. CONCLUSIONS: Decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10311450/ /pubmed/37395995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816 Text en © 2023 Kohut, Morton, Turner, Shepherd, Fenerty, Woods, Grimmett, Eccles and Foster. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Kohut, Kelly Morton, Kate Turner, Lesley Shepherd, Jonathan Fenerty, Vicky Woods, Lois Grimmett, Chloe Eccles, Diana M. Foster, Claire Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title | Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title_full | Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title_fullStr | Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title_short | Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
title_sort | patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience |
topic | Health Services |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311450/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kohutkelly patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT mortonkate patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT turnerlesley patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT shepherdjonathan patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT fenertyvicky patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT woodslois patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT grimmettchloe patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT ecclesdianam patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience AT fosterclaire patientdecisionsupportresourcesinformdecisionsaboutcancersusceptibilitygenetictestingandriskmanagementasystematicreviewofpatientimpactandexperience |