Cargando…

Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device’s two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minakata, Nobuhisa, Murano, Tatsuro, Wakabayashi, Masashi, Sasabe, Maasa, Watanabe, Takashi, Mitsui, Tomohiro, Yamashita, Hiroki, Inaba, Atsushi, Sunakawa, Hironori, Nakajo, Keiichiro, Kadota, Tomohiro, Shinmura, Kensuke, Ikematsu, Hiroaki, Yano, Tomonori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668
_version_ 1785066780845146112
author Minakata, Nobuhisa
Murano, Tatsuro
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Sasabe, Maasa
Watanabe, Takashi
Mitsui, Tomohiro
Yamashita, Hiroki
Inaba, Atsushi
Sunakawa, Hironori
Nakajo, Keiichiro
Kadota, Tomohiro
Shinmura, Kensuke
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Yano, Tomonori
author_facet Minakata, Nobuhisa
Murano, Tatsuro
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Sasabe, Maasa
Watanabe, Takashi
Mitsui, Tomohiro
Yamashita, Hiroki
Inaba, Atsushi
Sunakawa, Hironori
Nakajo, Keiichiro
Kadota, Tomohiro
Shinmura, Kensuke
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Yano, Tomonori
author_sort Minakata, Nobuhisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device’s two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection enabled safe resection of colorectal lesions measuring 10–15 mm in an ex vivo porcine model. ER with bipolar snare is expected to have good treatment outcomes in 10–15 mm colorectal lesions, with high safety even without submucosal injection. However, no clinical reports have compared treatment outcomes with and without submucosal injection. AIM: To compare the treatment outcomes of bipolar polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) to those with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study, we enrolled 10–15 mm nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (565 Lesions in 463 patients) diagnosed as type 2A based on the Japan Narrow-band Imaging Expert Team classification, resected by either HSP or EMR between January 2018 and June 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Lesions were divided into HSP and EMR groups, and propensity score matching was performed. In the matched cohort, en bloc and R0 resection rates and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 565 lesions in 463 patients, 117 lesions each in the HSP and EMR groups were selected after propensity score matching. In the original cohort, there was a significant difference in antithrombotic drug use (P < 0.05), lesion size (P < 0.01), location (P < 0.01), and macroscopic type (P < 0.05) between the HSP and EMR groups. In the matched cohort, the en bloc resection rates were comparable between both groups [93.2% (109/117) vs 92.3% (108/117), P = 0.81], and there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate [77.8% (91/117) vs 80.3% (94/117), P = 0.64]. The incidence of delayed bleeding was similar in both groups [1.7% (2/117)]. Perforation occurred in the EMR group [0.9% (1/117)] but not in the HSP group. CONCLUSION: Using bipolar snare, ER of nonpedunculated 10–15 mm colorectal lesions may be performed safely and effectively, even without submucosal injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10311618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103116182023-07-01 Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching Minakata, Nobuhisa Murano, Tatsuro Wakabayashi, Masashi Sasabe, Maasa Watanabe, Takashi Mitsui, Tomohiro Yamashita, Hiroki Inaba, Atsushi Sunakawa, Hironori Nakajo, Keiichiro Kadota, Tomohiro Shinmura, Kensuke Ikematsu, Hiroaki Yano, Tomonori World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection (ER) with bipolar snare, in which the electric current only passes through the tissue between the device’s two electrodes, is a prominent method used to prevent perforation due to electricity potentially. ER using bipolar snare with or without submucosal injection enabled safe resection of colorectal lesions measuring 10–15 mm in an ex vivo porcine model. ER with bipolar snare is expected to have good treatment outcomes in 10–15 mm colorectal lesions, with high safety even without submucosal injection. However, no clinical reports have compared treatment outcomes with and without submucosal injection. AIM: To compare the treatment outcomes of bipolar polypectomy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) to those with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study, we enrolled 10–15 mm nonpedunculated colorectal lesions (565 Lesions in 463 patients) diagnosed as type 2A based on the Japan Narrow-band Imaging Expert Team classification, resected by either HSP or EMR between January 2018 and June 2021 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East. Lesions were divided into HSP and EMR groups, and propensity score matching was performed. In the matched cohort, en bloc and R0 resection rates and adverse events were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 565 lesions in 463 patients, 117 lesions each in the HSP and EMR groups were selected after propensity score matching. In the original cohort, there was a significant difference in antithrombotic drug use (P < 0.05), lesion size (P < 0.01), location (P < 0.01), and macroscopic type (P < 0.05) between the HSP and EMR groups. In the matched cohort, the en bloc resection rates were comparable between both groups [93.2% (109/117) vs 92.3% (108/117), P = 0.81], and there was no significant difference in the R0 resection rate [77.8% (91/117) vs 80.3% (94/117), P = 0.64]. The incidence of delayed bleeding was similar in both groups [1.7% (2/117)]. Perforation occurred in the EMR group [0.9% (1/117)] but not in the HSP group. CONCLUSION: Using bipolar snare, ER of nonpedunculated 10–15 mm colorectal lesions may be performed safely and effectively, even without submucosal injection. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-06-21 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10311618/ /pubmed/37398881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Minakata, Nobuhisa
Murano, Tatsuro
Wakabayashi, Masashi
Sasabe, Maasa
Watanabe, Takashi
Mitsui, Tomohiro
Yamashita, Hiroki
Inaba, Atsushi
Sunakawa, Hironori
Nakajo, Keiichiro
Kadota, Tomohiro
Shinmura, Kensuke
Ikematsu, Hiroaki
Yano, Tomonori
Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title_full Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title_fullStr Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title_full_unstemmed Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title_short Hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: Propensity score matching
title_sort hot snare polypectomy vs endoscopic mucosal resection using bipolar snare for intermediate size colorectal lesions: propensity score matching
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i23.3668
work_keys_str_mv AT minakatanobuhisa hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT muranotatsuro hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT wakabayashimasashi hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT sasabemaasa hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT watanabetakashi hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT mitsuitomohiro hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT yamashitahiroki hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT inabaatsushi hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT sunakawahironori hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT nakajokeiichiro hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT kadotatomohiro hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT shinmurakensuke hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT ikematsuhiroaki hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching
AT yanotomonori hotsnarepolypectomyvsendoscopicmucosalresectionusingbipolarsnareforintermediatesizecolorectallesionspropensityscorematching