Cargando…
Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study
BACKGROUND: Axial neck pain is one of the complications of posterior cervical surgeries such as laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of the PainVision apparatus for axial neck pain assessment by comparing it with other methods. METHODS: This prospective study included 118 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37391791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03904-4 |
_version_ | 1785066795238948864 |
---|---|
author | Inoue, Takeshi Soshi, Shigeru Yamamoto, Shun Saito, Mitsuru |
author_facet | Inoue, Takeshi Soshi, Shigeru Yamamoto, Shun Saito, Mitsuru |
author_sort | Inoue, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Axial neck pain is one of the complications of posterior cervical surgeries such as laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of the PainVision apparatus for axial neck pain assessment by comparing it with other methods. METHODS: This prospective study included 118 patients (90 men and 28 women; average age: 66.9 (32–86) years) with cervical myelopathy who underwent open-door laminoplasty at our medical center between April 2009 and August 2019. Pain degree (PD) measured by PainVision, visual analog scale (VAS), and bodily pain (BP), a subitem of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), were used to evaluate axial neck pain, which was investigated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Comparison of the scores at each evaluation time point found significant improvement between the pre- and post-operative values for all assessment methods. Further, on comparing the amounts of change between pre- and post-operative scores in each pain assessment method, we found significant differences in PD and VAS but not in BP. We also found significant positive correlations between PD and VAS at each time point (all p < 0.001) and significant negative correlations between PD and BP (all p < 0.05) and between VAS and BP (all p < 0.01) at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that PD and VAS are more sensitive indicators of changes in axial neck pain than BP and also that PD has an excellent correlation with VAS. These results suggest that the PainVision apparatus may be an effective instrument for quantifying axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty, though its superiority over VAS needs to be verified in future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10311704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103117042023-07-01 Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study Inoue, Takeshi Soshi, Shigeru Yamamoto, Shun Saito, Mitsuru J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Axial neck pain is one of the complications of posterior cervical surgeries such as laminoplasty. This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of the PainVision apparatus for axial neck pain assessment by comparing it with other methods. METHODS: This prospective study included 118 patients (90 men and 28 women; average age: 66.9 (32–86) years) with cervical myelopathy who underwent open-door laminoplasty at our medical center between April 2009 and August 2019. Pain degree (PD) measured by PainVision, visual analog scale (VAS), and bodily pain (BP), a subitem of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF36), were used to evaluate axial neck pain, which was investigated preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Comparison of the scores at each evaluation time point found significant improvement between the pre- and post-operative values for all assessment methods. Further, on comparing the amounts of change between pre- and post-operative scores in each pain assessment method, we found significant differences in PD and VAS but not in BP. We also found significant positive correlations between PD and VAS at each time point (all p < 0.001) and significant negative correlations between PD and BP (all p < 0.05) and between VAS and BP (all p < 0.01) at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that PD and VAS are more sensitive indicators of changes in axial neck pain than BP and also that PD has an excellent correlation with VAS. These results suggest that the PainVision apparatus may be an effective instrument for quantifying axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty, though its superiority over VAS needs to be verified in future studies. BioMed Central 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10311704/ /pubmed/37391791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03904-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Inoue, Takeshi Soshi, Shigeru Yamamoto, Shun Saito, Mitsuru Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title | Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title_full | Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title_short | Efficacy of the PainVision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
title_sort | efficacy of the painvision apparatus for assessment of axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37391791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03904-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inouetakeshi efficacyofthepainvisionapparatusforassessmentofaxialneckpainaftercervicallaminoplastyaprospectivestudy AT soshishigeru efficacyofthepainvisionapparatusforassessmentofaxialneckpainaftercervicallaminoplastyaprospectivestudy AT yamamotoshun efficacyofthepainvisionapparatusforassessmentofaxialneckpainaftercervicallaminoplastyaprospectivestudy AT saitomitsuru efficacyofthepainvisionapparatusforassessmentofaxialneckpainaftercervicallaminoplastyaprospectivestudy |