Cargando…

Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery

PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic and functional outcomes using microperimetry for the surgical methods for idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 eyes from 41 patients. All patients underwent combined epiretinal membrane and cataract surgery. Best-co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nam, Seung Wan, Byun, Zeeyoon, Ham, Don-Il, Kong, Mingui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03056-3
_version_ 1785066809007800320
author Nam, Seung Wan
Byun, Zeeyoon
Ham, Don-Il
Kong, Mingui
author_facet Nam, Seung Wan
Byun, Zeeyoon
Ham, Don-Il
Kong, Mingui
author_sort Nam, Seung Wan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic and functional outcomes using microperimetry for the surgical methods for idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 eyes from 41 patients. All patients underwent combined epiretinal membrane and cataract surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography, and microperimetry were performed before and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups; “ERM removal only without indocyanine green (ICG) staining”, “ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal without ICG staining”, and “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining”. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the ages, BCVAs, central macular thickness (CMT), and mean retinal sensitivities of central 6° (MRSs) of the groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, the MRSs of the “ERM removal only without ICG staining” and “ERM and ILM removal without ICG staining” groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The MRSs of the “ERM and ILM removal without ICG staining” and “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining” groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). However, the MRSs of the “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining” group significantly reduced than “ERM removal only without ICG staining” group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study found reduced retinal sensitivity in ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining group compared to ERM removal only without ICG staining. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10311761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103117612023-07-01 Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery Nam, Seung Wan Byun, Zeeyoon Ham, Don-Il Kong, Mingui BMC Ophthalmol Research PURPOSE: To investigate the anatomic and functional outcomes using microperimetry for the surgical methods for idiopathic epiretinal membranes (ERM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 41 eyes from 41 patients. All patients underwent combined epiretinal membrane and cataract surgery. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography, and microperimetry were performed before and 6 months and 1 year after surgery. The patients were divided into 3 groups; “ERM removal only without indocyanine green (ICG) staining”, “ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal without ICG staining”, and “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining”. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the ages, BCVAs, central macular thickness (CMT), and mean retinal sensitivities of central 6° (MRSs) of the groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Postoperatively, the MRSs of the “ERM removal only without ICG staining” and “ERM and ILM removal without ICG staining” groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The MRSs of the “ERM and ILM removal without ICG staining” and “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining” groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). However, the MRSs of the “ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining” group significantly reduced than “ERM removal only without ICG staining” group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study found reduced retinal sensitivity in ERM and ILM removal with ICG staining group compared to ERM removal only without ICG staining. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10311761/ /pubmed/37386389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03056-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nam, Seung Wan
Byun, Zeeyoon
Ham, Don-Il
Kong, Mingui
Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title_full Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title_fullStr Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title_full_unstemmed Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title_short Microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
title_sort microperimetric evaluation for different methods of epiretinal membrane surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386389
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-03056-3
work_keys_str_mv AT namseungwan microperimetricevaluationfordifferentmethodsofepiretinalmembranesurgery
AT byunzeeyoon microperimetricevaluationfordifferentmethodsofepiretinalmembranesurgery
AT hamdonil microperimetricevaluationfordifferentmethodsofepiretinalmembranesurgery
AT kongmingui microperimetricevaluationfordifferentmethodsofepiretinalmembranesurgery