Cargando…
Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium
BACKGROUND: Self-testing has been promoted as a means of increasing COVID-19 test coverage. In Belgium, self-testing was recommended as a complement to the formal, provider-administered indications, such as out of courtesy before meeting others and when feared to be infected. More than a year after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09704-0 |
_version_ | 1785066809945227264 |
---|---|
author | Lafort, Yves Cornelissen, Laura Van Cauteren, Dieter Verboven, Barbara Drieskens, Sabine Couvreur, Simon Hermans, Lize Straetmans, Koen Lernout, Tinne |
author_facet | Lafort, Yves Cornelissen, Laura Van Cauteren, Dieter Verboven, Barbara Drieskens, Sabine Couvreur, Simon Hermans, Lize Straetmans, Koen Lernout, Tinne |
author_sort | Lafort, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Self-testing has been promoted as a means of increasing COVID-19 test coverage. In Belgium, self-testing was recommended as a complement to the formal, provider-administered indications, such as out of courtesy before meeting others and when feared to be infected. More than a year after the introduction of self-testing their place in the test strategy was evaluated. METHODS: We assessed trends in the number of self-tests sold, the number of positive self-tests reported, the proportion sold self-tests/total tests, and the proportion of all positive tests that were confirmed self-tests. To evaluate the reason why people use self-tests, we used the results of two online surveys among members of the general population: one among 27,397 people, held in April 2021, and one among 22,354 people, held in December 2021. RESULTS: The use of self-tests became substantial from end 2021 onwards. In the period mid-November 2021 – end-of-June 2022, the average proportion of reported sold self-tests to all COVID-19 tests was 37% and 14% of all positive tests were positive self-tests. In both surveys, the main reported reasons for using a self-test were having symptoms (34% of users in April 2021 and 31% in December 2021) and after a risk contact (27% in both April and December). Moreover, the number of self-tests sold, and the number of positive self-tests reported closely followed the same trend as the provider-administered tests in symptomatic people and high risk-contacts, which reinforces the hypothesis that they were mainly used for these two indications. CONCLUSIONS: From end 2021 onwards, self-testing covered a significant part of COVID-19 testing in Belgium, which increased without doubt the testing coverage. However, the available data seem to indicate that self-testing was mostly used for indications outside of official recommendations. If and how this affected the control of the epidemic remains unknown. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10311765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103117652023-07-01 Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium Lafort, Yves Cornelissen, Laura Van Cauteren, Dieter Verboven, Barbara Drieskens, Sabine Couvreur, Simon Hermans, Lize Straetmans, Koen Lernout, Tinne BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Self-testing has been promoted as a means of increasing COVID-19 test coverage. In Belgium, self-testing was recommended as a complement to the formal, provider-administered indications, such as out of courtesy before meeting others and when feared to be infected. More than a year after the introduction of self-testing their place in the test strategy was evaluated. METHODS: We assessed trends in the number of self-tests sold, the number of positive self-tests reported, the proportion sold self-tests/total tests, and the proportion of all positive tests that were confirmed self-tests. To evaluate the reason why people use self-tests, we used the results of two online surveys among members of the general population: one among 27,397 people, held in April 2021, and one among 22,354 people, held in December 2021. RESULTS: The use of self-tests became substantial from end 2021 onwards. In the period mid-November 2021 – end-of-June 2022, the average proportion of reported sold self-tests to all COVID-19 tests was 37% and 14% of all positive tests were positive self-tests. In both surveys, the main reported reasons for using a self-test were having symptoms (34% of users in April 2021 and 31% in December 2021) and after a risk contact (27% in both April and December). Moreover, the number of self-tests sold, and the number of positive self-tests reported closely followed the same trend as the provider-administered tests in symptomatic people and high risk-contacts, which reinforces the hypothesis that they were mainly used for these two indications. CONCLUSIONS: From end 2021 onwards, self-testing covered a significant part of COVID-19 testing in Belgium, which increased without doubt the testing coverage. However, the available data seem to indicate that self-testing was mostly used for indications outside of official recommendations. If and how this affected the control of the epidemic remains unknown. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10311765/ /pubmed/37386558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09704-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lafort, Yves Cornelissen, Laura Van Cauteren, Dieter Verboven, Barbara Drieskens, Sabine Couvreur, Simon Hermans, Lize Straetmans, Koen Lernout, Tinne Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title | Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title_full | Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title_fullStr | Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title_full_unstemmed | Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title_short | Were SARS-CoV-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? The experience in Belgium |
title_sort | were sars-cov-2 self-tests used for their intended purpose? the experience in belgium |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09704-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafortyves weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT cornelissenlaura weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT vancauterendieter weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT verbovenbarbara weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT drieskenssabine weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT couvreursimon weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT hermanslize weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT straetmanskoen weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium AT lernouttinne weresarscov2selftestsusedfortheirintendedpurposetheexperienceinbelgium |