Cargando…
Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7 |
_version_ | 1785066821075861504 |
---|---|
author | Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari Mirzaei, Masoud Grace, Sherry L Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam Sadeghi, Abbas Asadi, Zohre Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan |
author_facet | Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari Mirzaei, Masoud Grace, Sherry L Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam Sadeghi, Abbas Asadi, Zohre Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan |
author_sort | Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers were assessed via phone interview in phase II non-attenders from March 2017 to February 2018 with the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P). T-tests were used to compare scores, with each of 18 barriers scored out of 5, between men and women. RESULTS: 357 (33.9%) of the sample of 1053 were women, and they were older, less educated and less often employed than men. Total mean CRBS scores were significantly greater in women (2.37 ± 0.37) than men (2.29 ± 0.35; effect size[ES] = 0.08, confidence interval[CI]: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.001). The top CR barriers among women were cost (3.35; ES = 0.40, CI:0.23–0.56; P < 0.001), transportation problems (3.24; ES = 0.41, CI:0.25–0.58; P < 0.001), distance (3.21; ES = 0.31, CI:0.15–0.48; P < 0.001), comorbidities (2.97; ES = 0.49, CI:0.34–0.64; P < 0.001), low energy (2.41; ES = 0.29, CI:0.18–0.41; P < 0.001), finding exercise as tiring or painful (2.22; ES = 0.11, CI:0.02–0.21; P = 0.018), and older age (2.27; ES = 0.18, CI:0.07–0.28; P = 0.001). Men rated “already exercise at home or in community” (2.69; ES = 0.23, CI:0.1–0.36; P = 0.001), time constraints (2.18; ES = 0.15, CI:0.07–0.23; P < 0.001) and work responsibilities (2.24; ES = 0.16, CI:0.07–0.25; P = 0.001) as greater CR barriers than women. CONCLUSION: Women had greater barriers to CR participation than men. CR programs should be modified to address women’s needs. Home-based CR tailored to women’s exercise needs and preferences should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10311813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103118132023-07-01 Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari Mirzaei, Masoud Grace, Sherry L Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam Sadeghi, Abbas Asadi, Zohre Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers were assessed via phone interview in phase II non-attenders from March 2017 to February 2018 with the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P). T-tests were used to compare scores, with each of 18 barriers scored out of 5, between men and women. RESULTS: 357 (33.9%) of the sample of 1053 were women, and they were older, less educated and less often employed than men. Total mean CRBS scores were significantly greater in women (2.37 ± 0.37) than men (2.29 ± 0.35; effect size[ES] = 0.08, confidence interval[CI]: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.001). The top CR barriers among women were cost (3.35; ES = 0.40, CI:0.23–0.56; P < 0.001), transportation problems (3.24; ES = 0.41, CI:0.25–0.58; P < 0.001), distance (3.21; ES = 0.31, CI:0.15–0.48; P < 0.001), comorbidities (2.97; ES = 0.49, CI:0.34–0.64; P < 0.001), low energy (2.41; ES = 0.29, CI:0.18–0.41; P < 0.001), finding exercise as tiring or painful (2.22; ES = 0.11, CI:0.02–0.21; P = 0.018), and older age (2.27; ES = 0.18, CI:0.07–0.28; P = 0.001). Men rated “already exercise at home or in community” (2.69; ES = 0.23, CI:0.1–0.36; P = 0.001), time constraints (2.18; ES = 0.15, CI:0.07–0.23; P < 0.001) and work responsibilities (2.24; ES = 0.16, CI:0.07–0.25; P = 0.001) as greater CR barriers than women. CONCLUSION: Women had greater barriers to CR participation than men. CR programs should be modified to address women’s needs. Home-based CR tailored to women’s exercise needs and preferences should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10311813/ /pubmed/37386414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari Mirzaei, Masoud Grace, Sherry L Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam Sadeghi, Abbas Asadi, Zohre Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title | Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT firoozabadimahdiehghanbari sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT mirzaeimasoud sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT gracesherryl sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT vafaeinasabmohammadreza sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT dehghanitaftimaryam sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT sadeghiabbas sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT asadizohre sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy AT basirinezhadmohammadhasan sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy |