Cargando…

Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari, Mirzaei, Masoud, Grace, Sherry L, Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza, Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam, Sadeghi, Abbas, Asadi, Zohre, Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7
_version_ 1785066821075861504
author Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari
Mirzaei, Masoud
Grace, Sherry L
Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza
Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam
Sadeghi, Abbas
Asadi, Zohre
Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan
author_facet Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari
Mirzaei, Masoud
Grace, Sherry L
Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza
Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam
Sadeghi, Abbas
Asadi, Zohre
Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan
author_sort Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers were assessed via phone interview in phase II non-attenders from March 2017 to February 2018 with the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P). T-tests were used to compare scores, with each of 18 barriers scored out of 5, between men and women. RESULTS: 357 (33.9%) of the sample of 1053 were women, and they were older, less educated and less often employed than men. Total mean CRBS scores were significantly greater in women (2.37 ± 0.37) than men (2.29 ± 0.35; effect size[ES] = 0.08, confidence interval[CI]: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.001). The top CR barriers among women were cost (3.35; ES = 0.40, CI:0.23–0.56; P < 0.001), transportation problems (3.24; ES = 0.41, CI:0.25–0.58; P < 0.001), distance (3.21; ES = 0.31, CI:0.15–0.48; P < 0.001), comorbidities (2.97; ES = 0.49, CI:0.34–0.64; P < 0.001), low energy (2.41; ES = 0.29, CI:0.18–0.41; P < 0.001), finding exercise as tiring or painful (2.22; ES = 0.11, CI:0.02–0.21; P = 0.018), and older age (2.27; ES = 0.18, CI:0.07–0.28; P = 0.001). Men rated “already exercise at home or in community” (2.69; ES = 0.23, CI:0.1–0.36; P = 0.001), time constraints (2.18; ES = 0.15, CI:0.07–0.23; P < 0.001) and work responsibilities (2.24; ES = 0.16, CI:0.07–0.25; P = 0.001) as greater CR barriers than women. CONCLUSION: Women had greater barriers to CR participation than men. CR programs should be modified to address women’s needs. Home-based CR tailored to women’s exercise needs and preferences should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10311813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103118132023-07-01 Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari Mirzaei, Masoud Grace, Sherry L Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam Sadeghi, Abbas Asadi, Zohre Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains under-utilized, particularly by women. This study compared CR barriers between non-enrolling men and women in Iran, which has among the lowest gender equality globally. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, CR barriers were assessed via phone interview in phase II non-attenders from March 2017 to February 2018 with the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P). T-tests were used to compare scores, with each of 18 barriers scored out of 5, between men and women. RESULTS: 357 (33.9%) of the sample of 1053 were women, and they were older, less educated and less often employed than men. Total mean CRBS scores were significantly greater in women (2.37 ± 0.37) than men (2.29 ± 0.35; effect size[ES] = 0.08, confidence interval[CI]: 0.03–0.13; p < 0.001). The top CR barriers among women were cost (3.35; ES = 0.40, CI:0.23–0.56; P < 0.001), transportation problems (3.24; ES = 0.41, CI:0.25–0.58; P < 0.001), distance (3.21; ES = 0.31, CI:0.15–0.48; P < 0.001), comorbidities (2.97; ES = 0.49, CI:0.34–0.64; P < 0.001), low energy (2.41; ES = 0.29, CI:0.18–0.41; P < 0.001), finding exercise as tiring or painful (2.22; ES = 0.11, CI:0.02–0.21; P = 0.018), and older age (2.27; ES = 0.18, CI:0.07–0.28; P = 0.001). Men rated “already exercise at home or in community” (2.69; ES = 0.23, CI:0.1–0.36; P = 0.001), time constraints (2.18; ES = 0.15, CI:0.07–0.23; P < 0.001) and work responsibilities (2.24; ES = 0.16, CI:0.07–0.25; P = 0.001) as greater CR barriers than women. CONCLUSION: Women had greater barriers to CR participation than men. CR programs should be modified to address women’s needs. Home-based CR tailored to women’s exercise needs and preferences should be considered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10311813/ /pubmed/37386414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Firoozabadi, Mahdieh Ghanbari
Mirzaei, Masoud
Grace, Sherry L
Vafaeinasab, Mohammadreza
Dehghani-Tafti, Maryam
Sadeghi, Abbas
Asadi, Zohre
Basirinezhad, Mohammad Hasan
Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title_full Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title_short Sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
title_sort sex differences in cardiac rehabilitation barriers among non-enrollees in the context of lower gender equality: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386414
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03331-7
work_keys_str_mv AT firoozabadimahdiehghanbari sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT mirzaeimasoud sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT gracesherryl sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT vafaeinasabmohammadreza sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT dehghanitaftimaryam sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT sadeghiabbas sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT asadizohre sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy
AT basirinezhadmohammadhasan sexdifferencesincardiacrehabilitationbarriersamongnonenrolleesinthecontextoflowergenderequalityacrosssectionalstudy