Cargando…

Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel

PURPOSE: This study investigates the applicability of optimized machine learning (ML) approach for the prediction of Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) using anatomic and anthropometric predictors. METHOD: To this end, 180 recruits were enrolled in a cross-sectional study of 30 MTSS (30.36 ± 4.80...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobhani, Vahid, Asgari, Alireza, Arabfard, Masoud, Ebrahimpour, Zeynab, Shakibaee, Abolfazl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06404-0
_version_ 1785066839708008448
author Sobhani, Vahid
Asgari, Alireza
Arabfard, Masoud
Ebrahimpour, Zeynab
Shakibaee, Abolfazl
author_facet Sobhani, Vahid
Asgari, Alireza
Arabfard, Masoud
Ebrahimpour, Zeynab
Shakibaee, Abolfazl
author_sort Sobhani, Vahid
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study investigates the applicability of optimized machine learning (ML) approach for the prediction of Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) using anatomic and anthropometric predictors. METHOD: To this end, 180 recruits were enrolled in a cross-sectional study of 30 MTSS (30.36 ± 4.80 years) and 150 normal (29.70 ± 3.81 years). Twenty-five predictors/features, including demographic, anatomic, and anthropometric variables, were selected as risk factors. Bayesian optimization method was used to evaluate the most applicable machine learning algorithm with tuned hyperparameters on the training data. Three experiments were performed to handle the imbalances in the data set. The validation criteria were accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The highest performance (even 100%) was observed for the Ensemble and SVM classification models while using at least 6 and 10 most important predictors in undersampling and oversampling experiments, respectively. In the no-resampling experiment, the best performance (accuracy = 88.89%, sensitivity = 66.67%, specificity = 95.24%, and AUC = 0.8571) was achieved for the Naive Bayes classifier with the 12 most important features. CONCLUSION: The Naive Bayes, Ensemble, and SVM methods could be the primary choices to apply the machine learning approach in MTSS risk prediction. These predictive methods, alongside the eight common proposed predictors, might help to more accurately calculate the individual risk of developing MTSS at the point of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10311883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103118832023-07-01 Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel Sobhani, Vahid Asgari, Alireza Arabfard, Masoud Ebrahimpour, Zeynab Shakibaee, Abolfazl BMC Res Notes Research Note PURPOSE: This study investigates the applicability of optimized machine learning (ML) approach for the prediction of Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) using anatomic and anthropometric predictors. METHOD: To this end, 180 recruits were enrolled in a cross-sectional study of 30 MTSS (30.36 ± 4.80 years) and 150 normal (29.70 ± 3.81 years). Twenty-five predictors/features, including demographic, anatomic, and anthropometric variables, were selected as risk factors. Bayesian optimization method was used to evaluate the most applicable machine learning algorithm with tuned hyperparameters on the training data. Three experiments were performed to handle the imbalances in the data set. The validation criteria were accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: The highest performance (even 100%) was observed for the Ensemble and SVM classification models while using at least 6 and 10 most important predictors in undersampling and oversampling experiments, respectively. In the no-resampling experiment, the best performance (accuracy = 88.89%, sensitivity = 66.67%, specificity = 95.24%, and AUC = 0.8571) was achieved for the Naive Bayes classifier with the 12 most important features. CONCLUSION: The Naive Bayes, Ensemble, and SVM methods could be the primary choices to apply the machine learning approach in MTSS risk prediction. These predictive methods, alongside the eight common proposed predictors, might help to more accurately calculate the individual risk of developing MTSS at the point of care. BioMed Central 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10311883/ /pubmed/37386606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06404-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Sobhani, Vahid
Asgari, Alireza
Arabfard, Masoud
Ebrahimpour, Zeynab
Shakibaee, Abolfazl
Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title_full Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title_fullStr Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title_short Comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
title_sort comparison of optimized machine learning approach to the understanding of medial tibial stress syndrome in male military personnel
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06404-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sobhanivahid comparisonofoptimizedmachinelearningapproachtotheunderstandingofmedialtibialstresssyndromeinmalemilitarypersonnel
AT asgarialireza comparisonofoptimizedmachinelearningapproachtotheunderstandingofmedialtibialstresssyndromeinmalemilitarypersonnel
AT arabfardmasoud comparisonofoptimizedmachinelearningapproachtotheunderstandingofmedialtibialstresssyndromeinmalemilitarypersonnel
AT ebrahimpourzeynab comparisonofoptimizedmachinelearningapproachtotheunderstandingofmedialtibialstresssyndromeinmalemilitarypersonnel
AT shakibaeeabolfazl comparisonofoptimizedmachinelearningapproachtotheunderstandingofmedialtibialstresssyndromeinmalemilitarypersonnel