Cargando…

Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges

Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture, particularly in older adults, accounting for approximately 5–6% of all fractures. This article provides a comprehensive review of PHFs, focusing on epidemiology, injury mechanism, clinical and radiographic assessment, classification sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baker, Hayden P, Gutbrod, Joseph, Cahill, Michael, Shi, Lewis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396822
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S340536
_version_ 1785066912438288384
author Baker, Hayden P
Gutbrod, Joseph
Cahill, Michael
Shi, Lewis
author_facet Baker, Hayden P
Gutbrod, Joseph
Cahill, Michael
Shi, Lewis
author_sort Baker, Hayden P
collection PubMed
description Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture, particularly in older adults, accounting for approximately 5–6% of all fractures. This article provides a comprehensive review of PHFs, focusing on epidemiology, injury mechanism, clinical and radiographic assessment, classification systems, and treatment options. The incidence of PHFs varies across regions, with rates ranging from 45.7 to 60.1 per 100,000 person-years. Females are more susceptible to PHFs than males, and the incidence is highest in women over the age of 85. The injury mechanism of PHFs is typically bimodal, with high-energy injuries predominant in younger individuals and low-energy injuries in the elderly. Clinical assessment of PHFs involves obtaining a thorough history, physical examination, and evaluation of associated injuries, particularly neurovascular injuries. Radiographic imaging helps assess fracture displacement and plan for treatment. The Neer classification system is the most commonly used classification for PHFs, although other systems, such as AO/OTA, Codman-Hertel, and Resch classifications, also exist. The choice of treatment depends on factors such as patient age, activity level, fracture pattern, and surgeon expertise. Nonoperative management is typically preferred for elderly patients with minimal displacement, while operative fixation is considered for more complex fractures. Nonoperative treatment involves sling immobilization followed by physiotherapy, with good outcomes reported for certain fracture patterns. Operative management options include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or arthroplasty. CRPP is suitable for specific fracture patterns, but the quality of reduction is crucial for favorable outcomes. ORIF is used when CRPP is not feasible, and various surgical approaches are available, each with its advantages and potential complications. PHFs are a significant clinical challenge due to their prevalence and complexity. Treatment decisions should be patient centered based on patient factors and fracture severity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10312335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103123352023-07-01 Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges Baker, Hayden P Gutbrod, Joseph Cahill, Michael Shi, Lewis Orthop Res Rev Review Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are a common type of fracture, particularly in older adults, accounting for approximately 5–6% of all fractures. This article provides a comprehensive review of PHFs, focusing on epidemiology, injury mechanism, clinical and radiographic assessment, classification systems, and treatment options. The incidence of PHFs varies across regions, with rates ranging from 45.7 to 60.1 per 100,000 person-years. Females are more susceptible to PHFs than males, and the incidence is highest in women over the age of 85. The injury mechanism of PHFs is typically bimodal, with high-energy injuries predominant in younger individuals and low-energy injuries in the elderly. Clinical assessment of PHFs involves obtaining a thorough history, physical examination, and evaluation of associated injuries, particularly neurovascular injuries. Radiographic imaging helps assess fracture displacement and plan for treatment. The Neer classification system is the most commonly used classification for PHFs, although other systems, such as AO/OTA, Codman-Hertel, and Resch classifications, also exist. The choice of treatment depends on factors such as patient age, activity level, fracture pattern, and surgeon expertise. Nonoperative management is typically preferred for elderly patients with minimal displacement, while operative fixation is considered for more complex fractures. Nonoperative treatment involves sling immobilization followed by physiotherapy, with good outcomes reported for certain fracture patterns. Operative management options include closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or arthroplasty. CRPP is suitable for specific fracture patterns, but the quality of reduction is crucial for favorable outcomes. ORIF is used when CRPP is not feasible, and various surgical approaches are available, each with its advantages and potential complications. PHFs are a significant clinical challenge due to their prevalence and complexity. Treatment decisions should be patient centered based on patient factors and fracture severity. Dove 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10312335/ /pubmed/37396822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S340536 Text en © 2023 Baker et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Baker, Hayden P
Gutbrod, Joseph
Cahill, Michael
Shi, Lewis
Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title_full Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title_fullStr Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title_short Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges
title_sort optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: risks and management challenges
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396822
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S340536
work_keys_str_mv AT bakerhaydenp optimaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfracturesintheelderlyrisksandmanagementchallenges
AT gutbrodjoseph optimaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfracturesintheelderlyrisksandmanagementchallenges
AT cahillmichael optimaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfracturesintheelderlyrisksandmanagementchallenges
AT shilewis optimaltreatmentofproximalhumeralfracturesintheelderlyrisksandmanagementchallenges