Cargando…
Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence
Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397803 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S410082 |
_version_ | 1785066920649687040 |
---|---|
author | Wan, George J Niewoehner, John Hayes, Kyle |
author_facet | Wan, George J Niewoehner, John Hayes, Kyle |
author_sort | Wan, George J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical and economic findings among 9 indications: infantile spasms (IS), multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), ocular inflammatory diseases (primarily uveitis and severe keratitis), symptomatic sarcoidosis, and proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Key studies of clinical efficacy and healthcare resource utilization and cost from 1956 to 2022 are discussed. Evidence supports the efficacy of RCI across all 9 indications. RCI is recommended as first-line treatment for IS and is associated with improved outcomes for the other 8 indications, including increased recovery rates in MS relapse; improved disease control in RA, SLE, and DM/PM; real-world effectiveness in patients with uveitis and severe keratitis; improved lung function and reduced corticosteroid use in symptomatic sarcoidosis; and increased rates of partial remission of proteinuria in NS. For many indications, RCI may improve clinical outcomes during exacerbations or when conventional treatments have failed to show a benefit. RCI is also associated with a reduction in the use of biologics, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Economic data suggest RCI is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for MS relapse, RA, and SLE. Other economic benefits have been demonstrated for IS, MS relapses, RA, SLE, and DM/PM, including reduced hospitalizations, lengths of stay, inpatient and outpatient services, and emergency department visits. RCI is considered safe and effective and features economic benefits for numerous indications. Its ability to control relapse and disease activity makes RCI an important nonsteroid treatment option that could help preserve functioning and well-being among patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10312382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103123822023-07-01 Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence Wan, George J Niewoehner, John Hayes, Kyle Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Review Acthar(®) Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical and economic findings among 9 indications: infantile spasms (IS), multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), ocular inflammatory diseases (primarily uveitis and severe keratitis), symptomatic sarcoidosis, and proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Key studies of clinical efficacy and healthcare resource utilization and cost from 1956 to 2022 are discussed. Evidence supports the efficacy of RCI across all 9 indications. RCI is recommended as first-line treatment for IS and is associated with improved outcomes for the other 8 indications, including increased recovery rates in MS relapse; improved disease control in RA, SLE, and DM/PM; real-world effectiveness in patients with uveitis and severe keratitis; improved lung function and reduced corticosteroid use in symptomatic sarcoidosis; and increased rates of partial remission of proteinuria in NS. For many indications, RCI may improve clinical outcomes during exacerbations or when conventional treatments have failed to show a benefit. RCI is also associated with a reduction in the use of biologics, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Economic data suggest RCI is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for MS relapse, RA, and SLE. Other economic benefits have been demonstrated for IS, MS relapses, RA, SLE, and DM/PM, including reduced hospitalizations, lengths of stay, inpatient and outpatient services, and emergency department visits. RCI is considered safe and effective and features economic benefits for numerous indications. Its ability to control relapse and disease activity makes RCI an important nonsteroid treatment option that could help preserve functioning and well-being among patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Dove 2023-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10312382/ /pubmed/37397803 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S410082 Text en © 2023 Wan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Wan, George J Niewoehner, John Hayes, Kyle Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title | Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title_full | Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title_fullStr | Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title_short | Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence |
title_sort | acthar gel (rci): a narrative literature review of clinical and economic evidence |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397803 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S410082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangeorgej acthargelrcianarrativeliteraturereviewofclinicalandeconomicevidence AT niewoehnerjohn acthargelrcianarrativeliteraturereviewofclinicalandeconomicevidence AT hayeskyle acthargelrcianarrativeliteraturereviewofclinicalandeconomicevidence |