Cargando…

No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice

Toi et al. (Science, 378, 160–168, 2022) reported direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) by fMRI in anesthetized mice at 9.4 T, which could be a revolutionary approach for advancing systems neuroscience research. There have been no independent replications of this observation to date. We perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Sang-Han, Im, Geun Ho, Choi, Sangcheon, Yu, Xin, Bandettini, Peter A., Menon, Ravi S., Kim, Seong-Gi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.26.542419
_version_ 1785066979008184320
author Choi, Sang-Han
Im, Geun Ho
Choi, Sangcheon
Yu, Xin
Bandettini, Peter A.
Menon, Ravi S.
Kim, Seong-Gi
author_facet Choi, Sang-Han
Im, Geun Ho
Choi, Sangcheon
Yu, Xin
Bandettini, Peter A.
Menon, Ravi S.
Kim, Seong-Gi
author_sort Choi, Sang-Han
collection PubMed
description Toi et al. (Science, 378, 160–168, 2022) reported direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) by fMRI in anesthetized mice at 9.4 T, which could be a revolutionary approach for advancing systems neuroscience research. There have been no independent replications of this observation to date. We performed fMRI experiments in anesthetized mice at an ultrahigh field of 15.2 T using the identical protocol as in their paper. The BOLD response to whisker stimulation was reliably detected in the primary barrel cortex before and after DIANA experiments; however, no direct neuronal activity-like fMRI peak was observed in individual animals’ data with the 50–300 trials used in the DIANA publication. Extensively averaged data involving 1,050 trials in 6 mice (1,050×54 = 56,700 stimulus events) and having a temporal signal-to-noise ratio of 7,370, showed a flat baseline and no detectable neuronal activity-like fMRI peak. Thus we were unable to replicate the previously reported results using the same methods, despite a much higher number of trials, a much higher temporal signal-to-noise ratio, and a much higher magnetic field strength. We were able to demonstrate spurious, non-replicable peaks when using a small number of trials. It was only when performing the inappropriate approach of excluding outliers not conforming to the expected temporal characteristics of the response did we see a clear signal change; however, these signals were not observed when such a outlier elimination approach was not used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10312747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103127472023-07-01 No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice Choi, Sang-Han Im, Geun Ho Choi, Sangcheon Yu, Xin Bandettini, Peter A. Menon, Ravi S. Kim, Seong-Gi bioRxiv Article Toi et al. (Science, 378, 160–168, 2022) reported direct imaging of neuronal activity (DIANA) by fMRI in anesthetized mice at 9.4 T, which could be a revolutionary approach for advancing systems neuroscience research. There have been no independent replications of this observation to date. We performed fMRI experiments in anesthetized mice at an ultrahigh field of 15.2 T using the identical protocol as in their paper. The BOLD response to whisker stimulation was reliably detected in the primary barrel cortex before and after DIANA experiments; however, no direct neuronal activity-like fMRI peak was observed in individual animals’ data with the 50–300 trials used in the DIANA publication. Extensively averaged data involving 1,050 trials in 6 mice (1,050×54 = 56,700 stimulus events) and having a temporal signal-to-noise ratio of 7,370, showed a flat baseline and no detectable neuronal activity-like fMRI peak. Thus we were unable to replicate the previously reported results using the same methods, despite a much higher number of trials, a much higher temporal signal-to-noise ratio, and a much higher magnetic field strength. We were able to demonstrate spurious, non-replicable peaks when using a small number of trials. It was only when performing the inappropriate approach of excluding outliers not conforming to the expected temporal characteristics of the response did we see a clear signal change; however, these signals were not observed when such a outlier elimination approach was not used. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10312747/ /pubmed/37398157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.26.542419 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Sang-Han
Im, Geun Ho
Choi, Sangcheon
Yu, Xin
Bandettini, Peter A.
Menon, Ravi S.
Kim, Seong-Gi
No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title_full No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title_fullStr No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title_full_unstemmed No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title_short No Replication of Direct Neuronal Activity-related (DIANA) fMRI in Anesthetized Mice
title_sort no replication of direct neuronal activity-related (diana) fmri in anesthetized mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398157
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.26.542419
work_keys_str_mv AT choisanghan noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT imgeunho noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT choisangcheon noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT yuxin noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT bandettinipetera noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT menonravis noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice
AT kimseonggi noreplicationofdirectneuronalactivityrelateddianafmriinanesthetizedmice