Cargando…

Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on standard dose ipilimumab (Ipi) + nivolumab continue to have poor prognosis. Several studies support a dose-response activity of Ipi, and one promising combination is I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Julie, Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah, Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Magdalena, Gibson, Berit, Swami, Umang, Erickson-Wayman, Alyssa, Jamison, Debra, Sageser, Dan, Jeter, Joanne, Bowles, Tawnya, Cannon, Donald M., Haaland, Ben, Schroeder, Joyce D, Nix, David, Atkinson, Aaron, Hyngstrom, John, McPherson, Jordan, Tan, Aik-Choon, Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398360
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2997157/v1
_version_ 1785067007012503552
author Williamson, Julie
Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah
Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Magdalena
Gibson, Berit
Swami, Umang
Erickson-Wayman, Alyssa
Jamison, Debra
Sageser, Dan
Jeter, Joanne
Bowles, Tawnya
Cannon, Donald M.
Haaland, Ben
Schroeder, Joyce D
Nix, David
Atkinson, Aaron
Hyngstrom, John
McPherson, Jordan
Tan, Aik-Choon
Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen
author_facet Williamson, Julie
Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah
Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Magdalena
Gibson, Berit
Swami, Umang
Erickson-Wayman, Alyssa
Jamison, Debra
Sageser, Dan
Jeter, Joanne
Bowles, Tawnya
Cannon, Donald M.
Haaland, Ben
Schroeder, Joyce D
Nix, David
Atkinson, Aaron
Hyngstrom, John
McPherson, Jordan
Tan, Aik-Choon
Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen
author_sort Williamson, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on standard dose ipilimumab (Ipi) + nivolumab continue to have poor prognosis. Several studies support a dose-response activity of Ipi, and one promising combination is Ipi 10mg/kg (Ipi10) + temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced melanoma treated with Ipi10+TMZ in the immunotherapy refractory/resistant setting (n = 6), using similar patients treated with Ipi3+TMZ (n = 6) as comparison. Molecular profiling by whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq of tumors harvested through one responder’s treatment was performed. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 119 days, patients treated with Ipi10+TMZ had statistically significant longer median progression free survival of 144.5 days (range 27–219) vs 44 (26–75) in Ipi3+TMZ, p=0.04, and a trend for longer median overall survival of 154.5 days (27–537) vs 89.5 (26–548). All patients in the Ipi10 cohort had progressed on prior Ipi+Nivo. WES revealed only 12 shared somatic mutations including BRAF V600E. RNA-seq showed enrichment of inflammatory signatures, including interferon responses in metastatic lesions after standard dose Ipi + nivo and Ipi10 + TMZ compared to the primary tumor, and downregulated negative immune regulators including Wnt and TGFb signaling. CONCLUSION: Ipi10+TMZ demonstrated efficacy including dramatic responses in patients with advanced melanoma refractory to prior Ipi + anti-PD1, even with CNS metastases. Molecular data suggest a potential threshold of Ipi dose for activation of sufficient anti-tumor immune response, and higher dose Ipi is required for some patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10312907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Journal Experts
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103129072023-07-01 Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis Williamson, Julie Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Magdalena Gibson, Berit Swami, Umang Erickson-Wayman, Alyssa Jamison, Debra Sageser, Dan Jeter, Joanne Bowles, Tawnya Cannon, Donald M. Haaland, Ben Schroeder, Joyce D Nix, David Atkinson, Aaron Hyngstrom, John McPherson, Jordan Tan, Aik-Choon Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen Res Sq Article BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on standard dose ipilimumab (Ipi) + nivolumab continue to have poor prognosis. Several studies support a dose-response activity of Ipi, and one promising combination is Ipi 10mg/kg (Ipi10) + temozolomide (TMZ). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced melanoma treated with Ipi10+TMZ in the immunotherapy refractory/resistant setting (n = 6), using similar patients treated with Ipi3+TMZ (n = 6) as comparison. Molecular profiling by whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq of tumors harvested through one responder’s treatment was performed. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 119 days, patients treated with Ipi10+TMZ had statistically significant longer median progression free survival of 144.5 days (range 27–219) vs 44 (26–75) in Ipi3+TMZ, p=0.04, and a trend for longer median overall survival of 154.5 days (27–537) vs 89.5 (26–548). All patients in the Ipi10 cohort had progressed on prior Ipi+Nivo. WES revealed only 12 shared somatic mutations including BRAF V600E. RNA-seq showed enrichment of inflammatory signatures, including interferon responses in metastatic lesions after standard dose Ipi + nivo and Ipi10 + TMZ compared to the primary tumor, and downregulated negative immune regulators including Wnt and TGFb signaling. CONCLUSION: Ipi10+TMZ demonstrated efficacy including dramatic responses in patients with advanced melanoma refractory to prior Ipi + anti-PD1, even with CNS metastases. Molecular data suggest a potential threshold of Ipi dose for activation of sufficient anti-tumor immune response, and higher dose Ipi is required for some patients. American Journal Experts 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10312907/ /pubmed/37398360 http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2997157/v1 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Williamson, Julie
Fadlullah, Muhammad Zaki Hidayatullah
Kovacsovics-Bankowski, Magdalena
Gibson, Berit
Swami, Umang
Erickson-Wayman, Alyssa
Jamison, Debra
Sageser, Dan
Jeter, Joanne
Bowles, Tawnya
Cannon, Donald M.
Haaland, Ben
Schroeder, Joyce D
Nix, David
Atkinson, Aaron
Hyngstrom, John
McPherson, Jordan
Tan, Aik-Choon
Hu-Lieskovan, Siwen
Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title_short Response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
title_sort response to high dose ipilimumab plus temozolomide after progression on standard or low dose ipilimumab in advanced melanoma: a retrospective analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10312907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398360
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2997157/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsonjulie responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT fadlullahmuhammadzakihidayatullah responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT kovacsovicsbankowskimagdalena responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT gibsonberit responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT swamiumang responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT ericksonwaymanalyssa responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT jamisondebra responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT sageserdan responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT jeterjoanne responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT bowlestawnya responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT cannondonaldm responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT haalandben responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT schroederjoyced responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT nixdavid responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT atkinsonaaron responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hyngstromjohn responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mcphersonjordan responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT tanaikchoon responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis
AT hulieskovansiwen responsetohighdoseipilimumabplustemozolomideafterprogressiononstandardorlowdoseipilimumabinadvancedmelanomaaretrospectiveanalysis