Cargando…
Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture
Using the finite element analysis method to help us better understand the biomechanical changes of the spine after surgery and the changes in the stress distribution around the screw implantation area. The finite element model of L1 vertebral compression fracture was constructed by using a large num...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37390270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034145 |
_version_ | 1785067085650460672 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chunbo Zhang, Chunling Su, Feng Su, Liu Ma, Pengpeng Zong, Zhiguo Zhang, Xin Li, Wei Cai, Ming |
author_facet | Huang, Chunbo Zhang, Chunling Su, Feng Su, Liu Ma, Pengpeng Zong, Zhiguo Zhang, Xin Li, Wei Cai, Ming |
author_sort | Huang, Chunbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using the finite element analysis method to help us better understand the biomechanical changes of the spine after surgery and the changes in the stress distribution around the screw implantation area. The finite element model of L1 vertebral compression fracture was constructed by using a large number of finite element programs. On the fracture model, 2 kinds of internal fixation devices are set up, namely: the first type of 4 screws across the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + transverse connector; the second type of 4 screws crosses the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + non-transverse connector. To study the distribution of the maximum displacement and von Mises stress of the intramedullary pedicle screws and rods of the 2 types of internal fixation devices after implantation in the spine under certain loading conditions. In traditional open pedicle screw fixation, the maximum stress in the pedicle screw fixation system in the direction of 3D movement is higher than in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw between the 2 procedures when the spine performs flexion-extension and lateral flexion activities. When the spine is rotating axially, the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw in conventional open surgery is significantly less than that of the screw in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Traditional open internal fixation produces stress peaks of 891.7 MPa and 886.34 MPa at the transverse joint during axial rotation. Only when the spine is rotating in the axial direction, the maximum displacement of traditional open pedicle screw fixation is smaller than that of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the maximum displacement between the 2 procedures when the spine is moving in other directions. Traditional open pedicle screw fixation can strengthen the stability of the spine in the direction of axial rotation, and can also be greater to reduce the maximum stress of the pedicle screw axial rotation, so the clinical treatment of unstable fractures of the thoracolumbar spine instability is of great significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10313251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103132512023-07-01 Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture Huang, Chunbo Zhang, Chunling Su, Feng Su, Liu Ma, Pengpeng Zong, Zhiguo Zhang, Xin Li, Wei Cai, Ming Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Using the finite element analysis method to help us better understand the biomechanical changes of the spine after surgery and the changes in the stress distribution around the screw implantation area. The finite element model of L1 vertebral compression fracture was constructed by using a large number of finite element programs. On the fracture model, 2 kinds of internal fixation devices are set up, namely: the first type of 4 screws across the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + transverse connector; the second type of 4 screws crosses the injured vertebra through the adjacent upper and lower vertebrae + non-transverse connector. To study the distribution of the maximum displacement and von Mises stress of the intramedullary pedicle screws and rods of the 2 types of internal fixation devices after implantation in the spine under certain loading conditions. In traditional open pedicle screw fixation, the maximum stress in the pedicle screw fixation system in the direction of 3D movement is higher than in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw between the 2 procedures when the spine performs flexion-extension and lateral flexion activities. When the spine is rotating axially, the Von Mises stress of the pedicle screw in conventional open surgery is significantly less than that of the screw in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Traditional open internal fixation produces stress peaks of 891.7 MPa and 886.34 MPa at the transverse joint during axial rotation. Only when the spine is rotating in the axial direction, the maximum displacement of traditional open pedicle screw fixation is smaller than that of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. There is no significant difference in the maximum displacement between the 2 procedures when the spine is moving in other directions. Traditional open pedicle screw fixation can strengthen the stability of the spine in the direction of axial rotation, and can also be greater to reduce the maximum stress of the pedicle screw axial rotation, so the clinical treatment of unstable fractures of the thoracolumbar spine instability is of great significance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10313251/ /pubmed/37390270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034145 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Chunbo Zhang, Chunling Su, Feng Su, Liu Ma, Pengpeng Zong, Zhiguo Zhang, Xin Li, Wei Cai, Ming Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title | Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title_full | Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title_fullStr | Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title_short | Finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
title_sort | finite element analysis of minimally invasive nail placement and traditional nail placement in the treatment of lumbar 1 vertebral compression fracture |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37390270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchunbo finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT zhangchunling finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT sufeng finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT suliu finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT mapengpeng finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT zongzhiguo finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT zhangxin finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT liwei finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture AT caiming finiteelementanalysisofminimallyinvasivenailplacementandtraditionalnailplacementinthetreatmentoflumbar1vertebralcompressionfracture |