Cargando…

Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Debreceni, Dorottya, Janosi, Kristof, Bocz, Botond, Turcsan, Marton, Lukacs, Reka, Simor, Tamas, Antolič, Bor, Vamos, Mate, Komocsi, Andras, Kupo, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783
_version_ 1785067125195407360
author Debreceni, Dorottya
Janosi, Kristof
Bocz, Botond
Turcsan, Marton
Lukacs, Reka
Simor, Tamas
Antolič, Bor
Vamos, Mate
Komocsi, Andras
Kupo, Peter
author_facet Debreceni, Dorottya
Janosi, Kristof
Bocz, Botond
Turcsan, Marton
Lukacs, Reka
Simor, Tamas
Antolič, Bor
Vamos, Mate
Komocsi, Andras
Kupo, Peter
author_sort Debreceni, Dorottya
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): −9.11 min (95% CI: −12.93 to −5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: −5.21 min (95% CI: −5.51 to −4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: −3.96 mGy (95% CI: −4.27 to −3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: −104.26 s (95% CI: −183.37 to −25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90–1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41–2.15; p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: The ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10313423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103134232023-07-01 Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Debreceni, Dorottya Janosi, Kristof Bocz, Botond Turcsan, Marton Lukacs, Reka Simor, Tamas Antolič, Bor Vamos, Mate Komocsi, Andras Kupo, Peter Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently performed cardiac ablation procedure worldwide. The majority of ablations can now be performed safely with minimal radiation exposure or even without the use of fluoroscopy, thanks to advances in 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping systems and/or intracardiac echocardiography. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of zero fluoroscopy (ZF) versus non-zero fluoroscopy (NZF) strategies for AF ablation procedures. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and systematically reviewed for studies comparing procedural parameters and outcomes of ZF vs. NZF approaches in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. We used a random-effects model to derive the mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included seven studies comprising 1,593 patients. The ZF approach was found to be feasible in 95.1% of patients. Compared to the NZF approach, the ZF approach significantly reduced procedure time [mean difference (MD): −9.11 min (95% CI: −12.93 to −5.30 min; p < 0.01)], fluoroscopy time [MD: −5.21 min (95% CI: −5.51 to −4.91 min; p < 0.01)], and fluoroscopy dose [MD: −3.96 mGy (95% CI: −4.27 to −3.64; p < 0.01)]. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of total ablation time [MD: −104.26 s (95% CI: −183.37 to −25.14; p = 0.12)]. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the acute [risk ratio (RR): 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02; p = 0.72] and long-term success rates (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90–1.03; p = 0.56) between the ZF and NZF methods. The complication rate was 2.76% in the entire study population and did not differ between the groups (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.41–2.15; p = 0.89). CONCLUSION: The ZF approach is a feasible method for AF ablation procedures. It significantly reduces procedure time and radiation exposure without compromising the acute and long-term success rates or complication rates. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10313423/ /pubmed/37396578 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783 Text en © 2023 Debreceni, Janosi, Bocz, Turcsan, Lukacs, Simor, Antolič, Vamos, Komocsi and Kupo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Debreceni, Dorottya
Janosi, Kristof
Bocz, Botond
Turcsan, Marton
Lukacs, Reka
Simor, Tamas
Antolič, Bor
Vamos, Mate
Komocsi, Andras
Kupo, Peter
Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37396578
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1178783
work_keys_str_mv AT debrecenidorottya zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT janosikristof zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boczbotond zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT turcsanmarton zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lukacsreka zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT simortamas zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT antolicbor zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vamosmate zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT komocsiandras zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kupopeter zerofluoroscopycatheterablationforatrialfibrillationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis