Cargando…
Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison
ABSTRACT: Stem cell–based cell therapeutics and especially those based on human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are said to have enormous developmental potential in the coming years. Their applications range from the treatment of orthopedic disorders and ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12583-4 |
_version_ | 1785067155205652480 |
---|---|
author | Teale, Misha A. Schneider, Samuel Eibl, Dieter van den Bos, Christian Neubauer, Peter Eibl, Regine |
author_facet | Teale, Misha A. Schneider, Samuel Eibl, Dieter van den Bos, Christian Neubauer, Peter Eibl, Regine |
author_sort | Teale, Misha A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Stem cell–based cell therapeutics and especially those based on human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are said to have enormous developmental potential in the coming years. Their applications range from the treatment of orthopedic disorders and cardiovascular diseases to autoimmune diseases and even cancer. However, while more than 27 hMSC-derived therapeutics are currently commercially available, hiPSC-based therapeutics have yet to complete the regulatory approval process. Based on a review of the current commercially available hMSC-derived therapeutic products and upcoming hiPSC-derived products in phase 2 and 3, this paper compares the cell therapy manufacturing process between these two cell types. Moreover, the similarities as well as differences are highlighted and the resulting impact on the production process discussed. Here, emphasis is placed on (i) hMSC and hiPSC characteristics, safety, and ethical aspects, (ii) their morphology and process requirements, as well as (iii) their 2- and 3-dimensional cultivations in dependence of the applied culture medium and process mode. In doing so, also downstream processing aspects are covered and the role of single-use technology is discussed. KEY POINTS: • Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cells exhibit distinct behaviors during cultivation • Single-use stirred bioreactor systems are preferred for the cultivation of both cell types • Future research should adapt and modify downstream processes to available single-use devices |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10313571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103135712023-07-02 Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison Teale, Misha A. Schneider, Samuel Eibl, Dieter van den Bos, Christian Neubauer, Peter Eibl, Regine Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Mini-Review ABSTRACT: Stem cell–based cell therapeutics and especially those based on human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are said to have enormous developmental potential in the coming years. Their applications range from the treatment of orthopedic disorders and cardiovascular diseases to autoimmune diseases and even cancer. However, while more than 27 hMSC-derived therapeutics are currently commercially available, hiPSC-based therapeutics have yet to complete the regulatory approval process. Based on a review of the current commercially available hMSC-derived therapeutic products and upcoming hiPSC-derived products in phase 2 and 3, this paper compares the cell therapy manufacturing process between these two cell types. Moreover, the similarities as well as differences are highlighted and the resulting impact on the production process discussed. Here, emphasis is placed on (i) hMSC and hiPSC characteristics, safety, and ethical aspects, (ii) their morphology and process requirements, as well as (iii) their 2- and 3-dimensional cultivations in dependence of the applied culture medium and process mode. In doing so, also downstream processing aspects are covered and the role of single-use technology is discussed. KEY POINTS: • Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cells exhibit distinct behaviors during cultivation • Single-use stirred bioreactor systems are preferred for the cultivation of both cell types • Future research should adapt and modify downstream processes to available single-use devices Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10313571/ /pubmed/37246986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12583-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mini-Review Teale, Misha A. Schneider, Samuel Eibl, Dieter van den Bos, Christian Neubauer, Peter Eibl, Regine Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title | Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title_full | Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title_fullStr | Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title_short | Mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
title_sort | mesenchymal and induced pluripotent stem cell–based therapeutics: a comparison |
topic | Mini-Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-023-12583-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tealemishaa mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison AT schneidersamuel mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison AT eibldieter mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison AT vandenboschristian mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison AT neubauerpeter mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison AT eiblregine mesenchymalandinducedpluripotentstemcellbasedtherapeuticsacomparison |