Cargando…

A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies

Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, Ji-Hee, Lim, Minyoung, Han, Gyeongjin, Park, Heejin, Kim, Yong-Bum, Park, Jinseok, Jun, Sang-Yeop, Lee, Jaeku, Cho, Jae-Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5
_version_ 1785067157099380736
author Hwang, Ji-Hee
Lim, Minyoung
Han, Gyeongjin
Park, Heejin
Kim, Yong-Bum
Park, Jinseok
Jun, Sang-Yeop
Lee, Jaeku
Cho, Jae-Woo
author_facet Hwang, Ji-Hee
Lim, Minyoung
Han, Gyeongjin
Park, Heejin
Kim, Yong-Bum
Park, Jinseok
Jun, Sang-Yeop
Lee, Jaeku
Cho, Jae-Woo
author_sort Hwang, Ji-Hee
collection PubMed
description Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to investigate abnormalities, and the deep learning method has been started to adopt in this study. However, comparative studies evaluating different deep learning algorithms for analyzing abnormal lesions are scarce. In this study, we applied three algorithms, SSD, Mask R-CNN, and DeepLabV3(+), to detect hepatic necrosis in slide images and determine the best deep learning algorithm for analyzing abnormal lesions. We trained each algorithm on 5750 images and 5835 annotations of hepatic necrosis including validation and test, augmented with 500 image tiles of 448 × 448 pixels. Precision, recall, and accuracy were calculated for each algorithm based on the prediction results of 60 test images of 2688 × 2688 pixels. The two segmentation algorithms, DeepLabV3(+) and Mask R-CNN, showed over 90% of accuracy (0.94 and 0.92, respectively), whereas SSD, an object detection algorithm, showed lower accuracy. The trained DeepLabV3(+) outperformed all others in recall while also successfully separating hepatic necrosis from other features in the test images. It is important to localize and separate the abnormal lesion of interest from other features to investigate it on a slide level. Therefore, we suggest that segmentation algorithms are more appropriate than object detection algorithms for use in the pathological analysis of images in non-clinical studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10313597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103135972023-07-02 A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies Hwang, Ji-Hee Lim, Minyoung Han, Gyeongjin Park, Heejin Kim, Yong-Bum Park, Jinseok Jun, Sang-Yeop Lee, Jaeku Cho, Jae-Woo Toxicol Res Original Article Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to investigate abnormalities, and the deep learning method has been started to adopt in this study. However, comparative studies evaluating different deep learning algorithms for analyzing abnormal lesions are scarce. In this study, we applied three algorithms, SSD, Mask R-CNN, and DeepLabV3(+), to detect hepatic necrosis in slide images and determine the best deep learning algorithm for analyzing abnormal lesions. We trained each algorithm on 5750 images and 5835 annotations of hepatic necrosis including validation and test, augmented with 500 image tiles of 448 × 448 pixels. Precision, recall, and accuracy were calculated for each algorithm based on the prediction results of 60 test images of 2688 × 2688 pixels. The two segmentation algorithms, DeepLabV3(+) and Mask R-CNN, showed over 90% of accuracy (0.94 and 0.92, respectively), whereas SSD, an object detection algorithm, showed lower accuracy. The trained DeepLabV3(+) outperformed all others in recall while also successfully separating hepatic necrosis from other features in the test images. It is important to localize and separate the abnormal lesion of interest from other features to investigate it on a slide level. Therefore, we suggest that segmentation algorithms are more appropriate than object detection algorithms for use in the pathological analysis of images in non-clinical studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10313597/ /pubmed/37398569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Hwang, Ji-Hee
Lim, Minyoung
Han, Gyeongjin
Park, Heejin
Kim, Yong-Bum
Park, Jinseok
Jun, Sang-Yeop
Lee, Jaeku
Cho, Jae-Woo
A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title_full A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title_fullStr A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title_short A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
title_sort comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangjihee acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT limminyoung acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT hangyeongjin acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT parkheejin acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT kimyongbum acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT parkjinseok acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT junsangyeop acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT leejaeku acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT chojaewoo acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT hwangjihee comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT limminyoung comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT hangyeongjin comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT parkheejin comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT kimyongbum comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT parkjinseok comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT junsangyeop comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT leejaeku comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies
AT chojaewoo comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies