Cargando…
A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies
Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5 |
_version_ | 1785067157099380736 |
---|---|
author | Hwang, Ji-Hee Lim, Minyoung Han, Gyeongjin Park, Heejin Kim, Yong-Bum Park, Jinseok Jun, Sang-Yeop Lee, Jaeku Cho, Jae-Woo |
author_facet | Hwang, Ji-Hee Lim, Minyoung Han, Gyeongjin Park, Heejin Kim, Yong-Bum Park, Jinseok Jun, Sang-Yeop Lee, Jaeku Cho, Jae-Woo |
author_sort | Hwang, Ji-Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to investigate abnormalities, and the deep learning method has been started to adopt in this study. However, comparative studies evaluating different deep learning algorithms for analyzing abnormal lesions are scarce. In this study, we applied three algorithms, SSD, Mask R-CNN, and DeepLabV3(+), to detect hepatic necrosis in slide images and determine the best deep learning algorithm for analyzing abnormal lesions. We trained each algorithm on 5750 images and 5835 annotations of hepatic necrosis including validation and test, augmented with 500 image tiles of 448 × 448 pixels. Precision, recall, and accuracy were calculated for each algorithm based on the prediction results of 60 test images of 2688 × 2688 pixels. The two segmentation algorithms, DeepLabV3(+) and Mask R-CNN, showed over 90% of accuracy (0.94 and 0.92, respectively), whereas SSD, an object detection algorithm, showed lower accuracy. The trained DeepLabV3(+) outperformed all others in recall while also successfully separating hepatic necrosis from other features in the test images. It is important to localize and separate the abnormal lesion of interest from other features to investigate it on a slide level. Therefore, we suggest that segmentation algorithms are more appropriate than object detection algorithms for use in the pathological analysis of images in non-clinical studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10313597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103135972023-07-02 A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies Hwang, Ji-Hee Lim, Minyoung Han, Gyeongjin Park, Heejin Kim, Yong-Bum Park, Jinseok Jun, Sang-Yeop Lee, Jaeku Cho, Jae-Woo Toxicol Res Original Article Deep learning has recently become one of the most popular methods of image analysis. In non-clinical studies, several tissue slides are generated to investigate the toxicity of a test compound. These are converted into digital image data using a slide scanner, which is then studied by researchers to investigate abnormalities, and the deep learning method has been started to adopt in this study. However, comparative studies evaluating different deep learning algorithms for analyzing abnormal lesions are scarce. In this study, we applied three algorithms, SSD, Mask R-CNN, and DeepLabV3(+), to detect hepatic necrosis in slide images and determine the best deep learning algorithm for analyzing abnormal lesions. We trained each algorithm on 5750 images and 5835 annotations of hepatic necrosis including validation and test, augmented with 500 image tiles of 448 × 448 pixels. Precision, recall, and accuracy were calculated for each algorithm based on the prediction results of 60 test images of 2688 × 2688 pixels. The two segmentation algorithms, DeepLabV3(+) and Mask R-CNN, showed over 90% of accuracy (0.94 and 0.92, respectively), whereas SSD, an object detection algorithm, showed lower accuracy. The trained DeepLabV3(+) outperformed all others in recall while also successfully separating hepatic necrosis from other features in the test images. It is important to localize and separate the abnormal lesion of interest from other features to investigate it on a slide level. Therefore, we suggest that segmentation algorithms are more appropriate than object detection algorithms for use in the pathological analysis of images in non-clinical studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10313597/ /pubmed/37398569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hwang, Ji-Hee Lim, Minyoung Han, Gyeongjin Park, Heejin Kim, Yong-Bum Park, Jinseok Jun, Sang-Yeop Lee, Jaeku Cho, Jae-Woo A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title | A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title_full | A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title_short | A comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
title_sort | comparative study on the implementation of deep learning algorithms for detection of hepatic necrosis in toxicity studies |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43188-023-00173-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hwangjihee acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT limminyoung acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT hangyeongjin acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT parkheejin acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT kimyongbum acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT parkjinseok acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT junsangyeop acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT leejaeku acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT chojaewoo acomparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT hwangjihee comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT limminyoung comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT hangyeongjin comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT parkheejin comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT kimyongbum comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT parkjinseok comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT junsangyeop comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT leejaeku comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies AT chojaewoo comparativestudyontheimplementationofdeeplearningalgorithmsfordetectionofhepaticnecrosisintoxicitystudies |