Cargando…

Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment

BACKGROUND: As we enter the era of precision medicine, the role of adaptive designs, such as response-adaptive randomisation or enrichment designs in drug discovery and development, has become increasingly important to identify the treatment given to a patient based on one or more biomarkers. Tailor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinnat, Valentin, Chiche, Jean-Daniel, Demoule, Alexandre, Chevret, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101141
_version_ 1785067195971141632
author Vinnat, Valentin
Chiche, Jean-Daniel
Demoule, Alexandre
Chevret, Sylvie
author_facet Vinnat, Valentin
Chiche, Jean-Daniel
Demoule, Alexandre
Chevret, Sylvie
author_sort Vinnat, Valentin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As we enter the era of precision medicine, the role of adaptive designs, such as response-adaptive randomisation or enrichment designs in drug discovery and development, has become increasingly important to identify the treatment given to a patient based on one or more biomarkers. Tailoring the ventilation supply technique according to the responsiveness of patients to positive end-expiratory pressure is a suitable setting for such a design. METHODS: In the setting of marker-strategy design, we propose a Bayesian response-adaptive randomisation with enrichment design based on group sequential analyses. This design combines the elements of enrichment design and response-adaptive randomisation. Concerning the enrichment strategy, Bayesian treatment-by-subset interaction measures were used to adaptively enrich the patients most likely to benefit from an experimental treatment while controlling the false-positive rate. The operating characteristics of the design were assessed by simulation and compared to those of alternate designs. RESULTS: The results obtained allowed the detection of the superiority of one treatment over another and the presence of a treatment-by-subgroup interaction while keeping the false-positive rate at approximately 5\% and reducing the average number of included patients. In addition, simulation studies identified that the number of interim analyses and the burn-in period may have an impact on the performance of the scheme. CONCLUSION: The proposed design highlights important objectives of precision medicine, such as determining whether the experimental treatment is superior to another and identifying wheter such an efficacy could depend on patient profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10313856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103138562023-07-02 Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment Vinnat, Valentin Chiche, Jean-Daniel Demoule, Alexandre Chevret, Sylvie Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND: As we enter the era of precision medicine, the role of adaptive designs, such as response-adaptive randomisation or enrichment designs in drug discovery and development, has become increasingly important to identify the treatment given to a patient based on one or more biomarkers. Tailoring the ventilation supply technique according to the responsiveness of patients to positive end-expiratory pressure is a suitable setting for such a design. METHODS: In the setting of marker-strategy design, we propose a Bayesian response-adaptive randomisation with enrichment design based on group sequential analyses. This design combines the elements of enrichment design and response-adaptive randomisation. Concerning the enrichment strategy, Bayesian treatment-by-subset interaction measures were used to adaptively enrich the patients most likely to benefit from an experimental treatment while controlling the false-positive rate. The operating characteristics of the design were assessed by simulation and compared to those of alternate designs. RESULTS: The results obtained allowed the detection of the superiority of one treatment over another and the presence of a treatment-by-subgroup interaction while keeping the false-positive rate at approximately 5\% and reducing the average number of included patients. In addition, simulation studies identified that the number of interim analyses and the burn-in period may have an impact on the performance of the scheme. CONCLUSION: The proposed design highlights important objectives of precision medicine, such as determining whether the experimental treatment is superior to another and identifying wheter such an efficacy could depend on patient profile. Elsevier 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10313856/ /pubmed/37397429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101141 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Vinnat, Valentin
Chiche, Jean-Daniel
Demoule, Alexandre
Chevret, Sylvie
Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title_full Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title_fullStr Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title_full_unstemmed Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title_short Simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation Bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
title_sort simulation study for evaluating an adaptive-randomisation bayesian hybrid trial design with enrichment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37397429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101141
work_keys_str_mv AT vinnatvalentin simulationstudyforevaluatinganadaptiverandomisationbayesianhybridtrialdesignwithenrichment
AT chichejeandaniel simulationstudyforevaluatinganadaptiverandomisationbayesianhybridtrialdesignwithenrichment
AT demoulealexandre simulationstudyforevaluatinganadaptiverandomisationbayesianhybridtrialdesignwithenrichment
AT chevretsylvie simulationstudyforevaluatinganadaptiverandomisationbayesianhybridtrialdesignwithenrichment