Cargando…
Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study
BACKGROUND: To identify the impact of enrolment onto a national pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme for COVID-19 (COVID-19 Oximetry @home; CO@h) on health service use and mortality in patients attending Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212377 |
_version_ | 1785067219370115072 |
---|---|
author | Beaney, Thomas Clarke, Jonathan Alboksmaty, Ahmed Flott, Kelsey Fowler, Aidan Benger, Jonathan Aylin, Paul P Elkin, Sarah Darzi, Ara Neves, Ana Luisa |
author_facet | Beaney, Thomas Clarke, Jonathan Alboksmaty, Ahmed Flott, Kelsey Fowler, Aidan Benger, Jonathan Aylin, Paul P Elkin, Sarah Darzi, Ara Neves, Ana Luisa |
author_sort | Beaney, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To identify the impact of enrolment onto a national pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme for COVID-19 (COVID-19 Oximetry @home; CO@h) on health service use and mortality in patients attending Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of patients enrolled onto the CO@h pathway from EDs in England. We included all patients with a positive COVID-19 test from 1 October 2020 to 3 May 2021 who attended ED from 3 days before to 10 days after the date of the test. All patients who were admitted or died on the same or following day to the first ED attendance within the time window were excluded. In the primary analysis, participants enrolled onto CO@h were matched using demographic and clinical criteria to participants who were not enrolled. Five outcome measures were examined within 28 days of first ED attendance: (1) Death from any cause; (2) Any subsequent ED attendance; (3) Any emergency hospital admission; (4) Critical care admission; and (5) Length of stay. RESULTS: 15 621 participants were included in the primary analysis, of whom 639 were enrolled onto CO@h and 14 982 were controls. Odds of death were 52% lower in those enrolled (95% CI 7% to 75%) compared with those not enrolled onto CO@h. Odds of any ED attendance or admission were 37% (95% CI 16% to 63%) and 59% (95% CI 32% to 91%) higher, respectively, in those enrolled. Of those admitted, those enrolled had 53% (95% CI 7% to 76%) lower odds of critical care admission. There was no significant impact on length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that for patients assessed in ED, pulse oximetry remote monitoring may be a clinically effective and safe model for early detection of hypoxia and escalation. However, possible selection biases might limit the generalisability to other populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10313966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103139662023-07-02 Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study Beaney, Thomas Clarke, Jonathan Alboksmaty, Ahmed Flott, Kelsey Fowler, Aidan Benger, Jonathan Aylin, Paul P Elkin, Sarah Darzi, Ara Neves, Ana Luisa Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: To identify the impact of enrolment onto a national pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme for COVID-19 (COVID-19 Oximetry @home; CO@h) on health service use and mortality in patients attending Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of patients enrolled onto the CO@h pathway from EDs in England. We included all patients with a positive COVID-19 test from 1 October 2020 to 3 May 2021 who attended ED from 3 days before to 10 days after the date of the test. All patients who were admitted or died on the same or following day to the first ED attendance within the time window were excluded. In the primary analysis, participants enrolled onto CO@h were matched using demographic and clinical criteria to participants who were not enrolled. Five outcome measures were examined within 28 days of first ED attendance: (1) Death from any cause; (2) Any subsequent ED attendance; (3) Any emergency hospital admission; (4) Critical care admission; and (5) Length of stay. RESULTS: 15 621 participants were included in the primary analysis, of whom 639 were enrolled onto CO@h and 14 982 were controls. Odds of death were 52% lower in those enrolled (95% CI 7% to 75%) compared with those not enrolled onto CO@h. Odds of any ED attendance or admission were 37% (95% CI 16% to 63%) and 59% (95% CI 32% to 91%) higher, respectively, in those enrolled. Of those admitted, those enrolled had 53% (95% CI 7% to 76%) lower odds of critical care admission. There was no significant impact on length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that for patients assessed in ED, pulse oximetry remote monitoring may be a clinically effective and safe model for early detection of hypoxia and escalation. However, possible selection biases might limit the generalisability to other populations. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10313966/ /pubmed/36854617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212377 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Beaney, Thomas Clarke, Jonathan Alboksmaty, Ahmed Flott, Kelsey Fowler, Aidan Benger, Jonathan Aylin, Paul P Elkin, Sarah Darzi, Ara Neves, Ana Luisa Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title | Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title_full | Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title_short | Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with COVID-19 assessed in emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study |
title_sort | evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in emergency departments in england: a retrospective matched cohort study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36854617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212377 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beaneythomas evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT clarkejonathan evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT alboksmatyahmed evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT flottkelsey evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT fowleraidan evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT bengerjonathan evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT aylinpaulp evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT elkinsarah evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT darziara evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy AT nevesanaluisa evaluatingtheimpactofapulseoximetryremotemonitoringprogrammeonmortalityandhealthcareutilisationinpatientswithcovid19assessedinemergencydepartmentsinenglandaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy |