Cargando…

Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?

OBJECTIVES: Sensory experience is an important determinant of smoking initiation, brand choice and harm perception, but little is known about how cigarette design shapes sensory experience. This study reports which variations in tobacco blend and design characteristics available on the market are li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pennings, Jeroen L A, Ferris Wayne, Geoffrey, Klerx, Walther N M, Pauwels, Charlotte G G M, Talhout, Reinskje
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056856
_version_ 1785067221104459776
author Pennings, Jeroen L A
Ferris Wayne, Geoffrey
Klerx, Walther N M
Pauwels, Charlotte G G M
Talhout, Reinskje
author_facet Pennings, Jeroen L A
Ferris Wayne, Geoffrey
Klerx, Walther N M
Pauwels, Charlotte G G M
Talhout, Reinskje
author_sort Pennings, Jeroen L A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Sensory experience is an important determinant of smoking initiation, brand choice and harm perception, but little is known about how cigarette design shapes sensory experience. This study reports which variations in tobacco blend and design characteristics available on the market are likely to be perceived as different by consumers. METHODS: Truth Tobacco Industry Documents was reviewed for studies showing noticeable sensory differences resulting from variations in tobacco blend and design characteristics. These differences were compared with tobacco product data as available in the Dutch section of the European Common Entry Gate (EU-CEG) system on 30 April 2020. RESULTS: Industry documents identified discrimination thresholds for ventilation, pressure drop, tobacco weight, filter length, and tar and nicotine levels in smoke while evidence for other design characteristics was less conclusive. In the 103 different cigarette varieties in the EU-CEG database, five main types of cigarettes could be identified by principal component analysis, differing in (combinations of) design characteristics. The most significant differences between brand varieties were tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide emissions and associated parameters filter ventilation, filter length, cigarette length and tobacco weight. CONCLUSIONS: While some clusters of brand varieties provided a noticeably different product for consumers, in many cases design differences within these clusters did not exceed the expected discrimination threshold. This indicates that many products on the market are not discernibly different for consumers, and that proliferation of brand varieties has a non-sensory purpose, such as marketing. Policy makers should consider limiting available brand varieties and regulating design characteristics to reduce product appeal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10313973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103139732023-07-02 Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference? Pennings, Jeroen L A Ferris Wayne, Geoffrey Klerx, Walther N M Pauwels, Charlotte G G M Talhout, Reinskje Tob Control Original Research OBJECTIVES: Sensory experience is an important determinant of smoking initiation, brand choice and harm perception, but little is known about how cigarette design shapes sensory experience. This study reports which variations in tobacco blend and design characteristics available on the market are likely to be perceived as different by consumers. METHODS: Truth Tobacco Industry Documents was reviewed for studies showing noticeable sensory differences resulting from variations in tobacco blend and design characteristics. These differences were compared with tobacco product data as available in the Dutch section of the European Common Entry Gate (EU-CEG) system on 30 April 2020. RESULTS: Industry documents identified discrimination thresholds for ventilation, pressure drop, tobacco weight, filter length, and tar and nicotine levels in smoke while evidence for other design characteristics was less conclusive. In the 103 different cigarette varieties in the EU-CEG database, five main types of cigarettes could be identified by principal component analysis, differing in (combinations of) design characteristics. The most significant differences between brand varieties were tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide emissions and associated parameters filter ventilation, filter length, cigarette length and tobacco weight. CONCLUSIONS: While some clusters of brand varieties provided a noticeably different product for consumers, in many cases design differences within these clusters did not exceed the expected discrimination threshold. This indicates that many products on the market are not discernibly different for consumers, and that proliferation of brand varieties has a non-sensory purpose, such as marketing. Policy makers should consider limiting available brand varieties and regulating design characteristics to reduce product appeal. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10313973/ /pubmed/34845063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056856 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Pennings, Jeroen L A
Ferris Wayne, Geoffrey
Klerx, Walther N M
Pauwels, Charlotte G G M
Talhout, Reinskje
Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title_full Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title_fullStr Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title_full_unstemmed Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title_short Variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
title_sort variations in cigarette brand characteristics: can consumers tell the difference?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34845063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056856
work_keys_str_mv AT penningsjeroenla variationsincigarettebrandcharacteristicscanconsumerstellthedifference
AT ferriswaynegeoffrey variationsincigarettebrandcharacteristicscanconsumerstellthedifference
AT klerxwalthernm variationsincigarettebrandcharacteristicscanconsumerstellthedifference
AT pauwelscharlotteggm variationsincigarettebrandcharacteristicscanconsumerstellthedifference
AT talhoutreinskje variationsincigarettebrandcharacteristicscanconsumerstellthedifference