Cargando…
Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review
OBJECTIVE: Interventions to tackle the social determinants of health can improve outcomes during pregnancy and early childhood, leading to better health across the life course. Variation in content, timing and implementation of policies across the 4 UK nations allows for evaluation. We conducted a p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-325219 |
_version_ | 1785067230474534912 |
---|---|
author | Stewart, Emma Pearce, Anna Given, Joanne Gilbert, Ruth Brophy, Sinead Cookson, Richard Hardelid, Pia Harron, Katie L Leyland, Alastair Wood, Rachael Dundas, Ruth |
author_facet | Stewart, Emma Pearce, Anna Given, Joanne Gilbert, Ruth Brophy, Sinead Cookson, Richard Hardelid, Pia Harron, Katie L Leyland, Alastair Wood, Rachael Dundas, Ruth |
author_sort | Stewart, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Interventions to tackle the social determinants of health can improve outcomes during pregnancy and early childhood, leading to better health across the life course. Variation in content, timing and implementation of policies across the 4 UK nations allows for evaluation. We conducted a policy-mapping review (1981–2021) to identify relevant UK early years policies across the social determinants of health framework, and determine suitable candidates for evaluation using administrative data. METHODS: We used open keyword and category searches of UK and devolved Government websites, and hand searched policy reviews. Policies were rated and included using five criteria: (1) Potential for policy to affect maternal and child health outcomes; (2) Implementation variation across the UK; (3) Population reach and expected effect size; (4) Ability to identify exposed/eligible group in administrative data; (5) Potential to affect health inequalities. An expert consensus workshop determined a final shortlist. RESULTS: 336 policies and 306 strategy documents were identified. Policies were mainly excluded due to criteria 2–4, leaving 88. The consensus workshop identified three policy areas as suitable candidates for natural experiment evaluation using administrative data: pregnancy grants, early years education and childcare, and Universal Credit. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive policy review identifies valuable opportunities to evaluate sociostructural impacts on mother and child outcomes. However, many potentially impactful policies were excluded. This may lead to the inverse evidence law, where there is least evidence for policies believed to be most effective. This could be ameliorated by better access to administrative data, staged implementation of future policies or alternative evaluation methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10314013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103140132023-07-02 Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review Stewart, Emma Pearce, Anna Given, Joanne Gilbert, Ruth Brophy, Sinead Cookson, Richard Hardelid, Pia Harron, Katie L Leyland, Alastair Wood, Rachael Dundas, Ruth Arch Dis Child Original Research OBJECTIVE: Interventions to tackle the social determinants of health can improve outcomes during pregnancy and early childhood, leading to better health across the life course. Variation in content, timing and implementation of policies across the 4 UK nations allows for evaluation. We conducted a policy-mapping review (1981–2021) to identify relevant UK early years policies across the social determinants of health framework, and determine suitable candidates for evaluation using administrative data. METHODS: We used open keyword and category searches of UK and devolved Government websites, and hand searched policy reviews. Policies were rated and included using five criteria: (1) Potential for policy to affect maternal and child health outcomes; (2) Implementation variation across the UK; (3) Population reach and expected effect size; (4) Ability to identify exposed/eligible group in administrative data; (5) Potential to affect health inequalities. An expert consensus workshop determined a final shortlist. RESULTS: 336 policies and 306 strategy documents were identified. Policies were mainly excluded due to criteria 2–4, leaving 88. The consensus workshop identified three policy areas as suitable candidates for natural experiment evaluation using administrative data: pregnancy grants, early years education and childcare, and Universal Credit. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive policy review identifies valuable opportunities to evaluate sociostructural impacts on mother and child outcomes. However, many potentially impactful policies were excluded. This may lead to the inverse evidence law, where there is least evidence for policies believed to be most effective. This could be ameliorated by better access to administrative data, staged implementation of future policies or alternative evaluation methods. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10314013/ /pubmed/37001969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-325219 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Stewart, Emma Pearce, Anna Given, Joanne Gilbert, Ruth Brophy, Sinead Cookson, Richard Hardelid, Pia Harron, Katie L Leyland, Alastair Wood, Rachael Dundas, Ruth Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title | Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title_full | Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title_fullStr | Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title_short | Identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a UK policy-mapping review |
title_sort | identifying opportunities for upstream evaluations relevant to child and maternal health: a uk policy-mapping review |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-325219 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stewartemma identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT pearceanna identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT givenjoanne identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT gilbertruth identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT brophysinead identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT cooksonrichard identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT hardelidpia identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT harronkatiel identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT leylandalastair identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT woodrachael identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview AT dundasruth identifyingopportunitiesforupstreamevaluationsrelevanttochildandmaternalhealthaukpolicymappingreview |