Cargando…
TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol
BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377 |
_version_ | 1785067231880675328 |
---|---|
author | Steenbeek, Miranda P van Bommel, Majke H D intHout, Joanna Peterson, Christine B Simons, Michiel Roes, Kit C B Kets, Marleen Norquist, Barbara M Swisher, Elizabeth M Hermens, Rosella P M G Lu, Karen H de Hullu, Joanne A |
author_facet | Steenbeek, Miranda P van Bommel, Majke H D intHout, Joanna Peterson, Christine B Simons, Michiel Roes, Kit C B Kets, Marleen Norquist, Barbara M Swisher, Elizabeth M Hermens, Rosella P M G Lu, Karen H de Hullu, Joanne A |
author_sort | Steenbeek, Miranda P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of salpingectomy on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health compared with standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is non-inferior to the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of tubo-ovarian cancer among individuals at high inherited risk. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that postponement of oophorectomy after salpingectomy, to the age of 40–45 (BRCA1) or 45–50 (BRCA2) years, compared with the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy at age 35–40 (BRCA1) or 40–45 (BRCA2) years, is non-inferior in regard to tubo-ovarian cancer risk. TRIAL DESIGN: In this international prospective preference trial, participants will choose between the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy. Salpingectomy can be performed after the completion of childbearing and between the age of 25 and 40 (BRCA1), 25 and 45 (BRCA2), or 25 and 50 (BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers) years. Subsequent oophorectomy is recommended at a maximum delay of 5 years beyond the upper limit of the current guideline age for salpingo-oophorectomy. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline age, which is also the recommended age for salpingo-oophorectomy within the study, is 35–40 years for BRCA1, 40–45 years for BRCA2, and 45–50 years for BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Premenopausal individuals with a documented class IV or V germline pathogenic variant in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D gene who have completed childbearing are eligible for participation. Participants may have a personal history of a non-ovarian malignancy. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary outcome is the cumulative tubo-ovarian cancer incidence at the target age: 46 years for BRCA1 and 51 years for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size to ensure sufficient power to test non-inferiority of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy compared with salpingo-oophorectomy requires 1500 BRCA1 and 1500 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Participant recruitment is expected to be completed at the end of 2026 (total recruitment period of 5 years). The primary outcome is expected to be available in 2036 (minimal follow-up period of 10 years). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04294927. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10314019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103140192023-07-02 TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol Steenbeek, Miranda P van Bommel, Majke H D intHout, Joanna Peterson, Christine B Simons, Michiel Roes, Kit C B Kets, Marleen Norquist, Barbara M Swisher, Elizabeth M Hermens, Rosella P M G Lu, Karen H de Hullu, Joanne A Int J Gynecol Cancer Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy has gained interest for individuals at high risk for tubo-ovarian cancer as there is compelling evidence that especially high-grade serous carcinoma originates in the fallopian tubes. Two studies have demonstrated a positive effect of salpingectomy on menopause-related quality of life and sexual health compared with standard risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy is non-inferior to the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of tubo-ovarian cancer among individuals at high inherited risk. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that postponement of oophorectomy after salpingectomy, to the age of 40–45 (BRCA1) or 45–50 (BRCA2) years, compared with the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy at age 35–40 (BRCA1) or 40–45 (BRCA2) years, is non-inferior in regard to tubo-ovarian cancer risk. TRIAL DESIGN: In this international prospective preference trial, participants will choose between the novel salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy and the current standard salpingo-oophorectomy. Salpingectomy can be performed after the completion of childbearing and between the age of 25 and 40 (BRCA1), 25 and 45 (BRCA2), or 25 and 50 (BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers) years. Subsequent oophorectomy is recommended at a maximum delay of 5 years beyond the upper limit of the current guideline age for salpingo-oophorectomy. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline age, which is also the recommended age for salpingo-oophorectomy within the study, is 35–40 years for BRCA1, 40–45 years for BRCA2, and 45–50 years for BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Premenopausal individuals with a documented class IV or V germline pathogenic variant in the BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D gene who have completed childbearing are eligible for participation. Participants may have a personal history of a non-ovarian malignancy. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The primary outcome is the cumulative tubo-ovarian cancer incidence at the target age: 46 years for BRCA1 and 51 years for BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. SAMPLE SIZE: The sample size to ensure sufficient power to test non-inferiority of salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy compared with salpingo-oophorectomy requires 1500 BRCA1 and 1500 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Participant recruitment is expected to be completed at the end of 2026 (total recruitment period of 5 years). The primary outcome is expected to be available in 2036 (minimal follow-up period of 10 years). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04294927. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10314019/ /pubmed/37045546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377 Text en © IGCS and ESGO 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Steenbeek, Miranda P van Bommel, Majke H D intHout, Joanna Peterson, Christine B Simons, Michiel Roes, Kit C B Kets, Marleen Norquist, Barbara M Swisher, Elizabeth M Hermens, Rosella P M G Lu, Karen H de Hullu, Joanne A TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title | TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title_full | TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title_fullStr | TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title_short | TUBectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the TUBA-WISP II study protocol |
title_sort | tubectomy with delayed oophorectomy as an alternative to risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in high-risk women to assess the safety of prevention: the tuba-wisp ii study protocol |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004377 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steenbeekmirandap tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT vanbommelmajkehd tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT inthoutjoanna tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT petersonchristineb tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT simonsmichiel tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT roeskitcb tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT ketsmarleen tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT norquistbarbaram tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT swisherelizabethm tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT hermensrosellapmg tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT lukarenh tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol AT dehullujoannea tubectomywithdelayedoophorectomyasanalternativetoriskreducingsalpingooophorectomyinhighriskwomentoassessthesafetyofpreventionthetubawispiistudyprotocol |