Cargando…

Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. DESIGN: All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screenin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther, de Jonge, Lucie, van Iersel, Carola Adriana, Spaander, Manon C W, van Vuuren, Anneke J, van Kemenade, Folkert, Ramakers, Christian R, Dekker, Evelien, Nagetaal, Iris D, van Leerdam, Monique E, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328559
_version_ 1785067241820127232
author Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
van Iersel, Carola Adriana
Spaander, Manon C W
van Vuuren, Anneke J
van Kemenade, Folkert
Ramakers, Christian R
Dekker, Evelien
Nagetaal, Iris D
van Leerdam, Monique E
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_facet Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
van Iersel, Carola Adriana
Spaander, Manon C W
van Vuuren, Anneke J
van Kemenade, Folkert
Ramakers, Christian R
Dekker, Evelien
Nagetaal, Iris D
van Leerdam, Monique E
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_sort Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. DESIGN: All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, ‘before’, ‘during’ and ‘after’ the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs. RESULTS: Positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lower during (OR=0.91) and after (OR=0.95) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate. CONCLUSION: The impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103140612023-07-02 Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther de Jonge, Lucie van Iersel, Carola Adriana Spaander, Manon C W van Vuuren, Anneke J van Kemenade, Folkert Ramakers, Christian R Dekker, Evelien Nagetaal, Iris D van Leerdam, Monique E Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Gut Colon OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of delayed invitation on screen-detected and interval colorectal cancers (CRC) within a faecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based CRC screening programme. DESIGN: All individuals that participated in 2017 and 2018 with a negative FIT and were eligible for CRC screening in 2019 and 2020 were included using individual-level data. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between either the different time periods (ie, ‘before’, ‘during’ and ‘after’ the first COVID-19 wave) or the invitation interval on screen-detected and interval CRCs. RESULTS: Positive predictive value for advanced neoplasia (AN) was slightly lower during (OR=0.91) and after (OR=0.95) the first COVID-19 wave, but no significant difference was observed for the different invitation intervals. Out of all individuals that previously tested negative, 84 (0.004%) had an interval CRC beyond the 24 months since their last invitation. The time period of invitation as well as the extended invitation interval was not associated with detection rates for AN and interval CRC rate. CONCLUSION: The impact of the first COVID-19 wave on screening yield was modest. A very small proportion of the FIT negatives had an interval CRC possibly due to an extended interval, which potentially could have been prevented if they had received the invitation earlier. Nonetheless, no increase in interval CRC rate was observed, indicating that an extended invitation interval up to 30 months had no negative impact on the performance of the CRC screening programme and a modest extension of the invitation interval seems an appropriate intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-07 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10314061/ /pubmed/37076272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328559 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Colon
Toes-Zoutendijk, Esther
de Jonge, Lucie
van Iersel, Carola Adriana
Spaander, Manon C W
van Vuuren, Anneke J
van Kemenade, Folkert
Ramakers, Christian R
Dekker, Evelien
Nagetaal, Iris D
van Leerdam, Monique E
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title_full Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title_fullStr Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title_short Impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
title_sort impact of delayed screening invitations on screen-detected and interval cancers in the dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: individual-level data analysis
topic Colon
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-328559
work_keys_str_mv AT toeszoutendijkesther impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT dejongelucie impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT vanierselcarolaadriana impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT spaandermanoncw impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT vanvuurenannekej impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT vankemenadefolkert impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT ramakerschristianr impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT dekkerevelien impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT nagetaalirisd impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT vanleerdammoniquee impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis
AT lansdorpvogelaariris impactofdelayedscreeninginvitationsonscreendetectedandintervalcancersinthedutchcolorectalcancerscreeningprogrammeindividualleveldataanalysis