Cargando…

Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: The need for an interdisciplinary multimodal approach to the treatment of back pain has already been demonstrated by various studies. However, when considering the periods of incapacity to work in the longitudinal course after the multimodal pain therapy (MPT), limits in terms of its s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krueger, Kathrin, Schmetsdorf, Julia, Pavlovic, Maja, Runde, Werner, Zechel, Georg, Hemken, Norbert, Krauth, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067412
_version_ 1785067305459253248
author Krueger, Kathrin
Schmetsdorf, Julia
Pavlovic, Maja
Runde, Werner
Zechel, Georg
Hemken, Norbert
Krauth, Christian
author_facet Krueger, Kathrin
Schmetsdorf, Julia
Pavlovic, Maja
Runde, Werner
Zechel, Georg
Hemken, Norbert
Krauth, Christian
author_sort Krueger, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The need for an interdisciplinary multimodal approach to the treatment of back pain has already been demonstrated by various studies. However, when considering the periods of incapacity to work in the longitudinal course after the multimodal pain therapy (MPT), limits in terms of its sustainable effect become clear. Patients who receive MPT subsequently return to standard outpatient care, which is associated with a risk of relapse. A 12-month relapse prophylaxis (RP) programme, intended to follow a 4-week MPT, was developed to help patients make the transition to health-conscious and physically active behaviour in everyday life and to identify and prevent impending relapses at an early stage. The evaluation, based on a cluster randomised controlled trial, seeks to provide information on the benefits of early and intensive RP as part of MPT, examine whether it is cost effective, reduces the days of incapacity to work and increases functional capacity, as well as to examine other parameters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study population comprises members of a regional statutory health insurance fund in Germany, who are ≤62 years old, gainfully employed and have been incapacitated for work for at least 21 days due to a diagnosis of back pain. Over a recruitment period of 24 months, a maximum of 368 individuals can potentially be included in the MPT. The intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) will both receive MPT, after randomisation IG will receive RP and CG will receive no further therapy or support as part of the trial. The evaluation is carried out on the following levels: structural, process and results quality. Cost effectiveness is also assessed by means of a health economic evaluation. In addition to the collection of qualitative and quantitative primary data, claims data from the regional health insurance fund are also included in the analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval by the ethics committee of the Hannover Medical School (reference number: 8548_BO_S_2019). The study results will be disseminated in national and international journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00017654.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103144162023-07-02 Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial Krueger, Kathrin Schmetsdorf, Julia Pavlovic, Maja Runde, Werner Zechel, Georg Hemken, Norbert Krauth, Christian BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: The need for an interdisciplinary multimodal approach to the treatment of back pain has already been demonstrated by various studies. However, when considering the periods of incapacity to work in the longitudinal course after the multimodal pain therapy (MPT), limits in terms of its sustainable effect become clear. Patients who receive MPT subsequently return to standard outpatient care, which is associated with a risk of relapse. A 12-month relapse prophylaxis (RP) programme, intended to follow a 4-week MPT, was developed to help patients make the transition to health-conscious and physically active behaviour in everyday life and to identify and prevent impending relapses at an early stage. The evaluation, based on a cluster randomised controlled trial, seeks to provide information on the benefits of early and intensive RP as part of MPT, examine whether it is cost effective, reduces the days of incapacity to work and increases functional capacity, as well as to examine other parameters. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study population comprises members of a regional statutory health insurance fund in Germany, who are ≤62 years old, gainfully employed and have been incapacitated for work for at least 21 days due to a diagnosis of back pain. Over a recruitment period of 24 months, a maximum of 368 individuals can potentially be included in the MPT. The intervention group (IG) and control group (CG) will both receive MPT, after randomisation IG will receive RP and CG will receive no further therapy or support as part of the trial. The evaluation is carried out on the following levels: structural, process and results quality. Cost effectiveness is also assessed by means of a health economic evaluation. In addition to the collection of qualitative and quantitative primary data, claims data from the regional health insurance fund are also included in the analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval by the ethics committee of the Hannover Medical School (reference number: 8548_BO_S_2019). The study results will be disseminated in national and international journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00017654. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10314416/ /pubmed/37349102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067412 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Krueger, Kathrin
Schmetsdorf, Julia
Pavlovic, Maja
Runde, Werner
Zechel, Georg
Hemken, Norbert
Krauth, Christian
Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (MMS-RFP study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of a multimodal pain therapy approach with relapse prophylaxis for back pain (mms-rfp study): a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37349102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067412
work_keys_str_mv AT kruegerkathrin evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schmetsdorfjulia evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pavlovicmaja evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rundewerner evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zechelgeorg evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hemkennorbert evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krauthchristian evaluationofamultimodalpaintherapyapproachwithrelapseprophylaxisforbackpainmmsrfpstudyastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial