Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys

OBJECTIVES: We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier. DESIGN: Cros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chipanta, David, Kapambwe, Sharon, Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda, Pascoe, Margaret, Amo-Agyei, Silas, Bohlius, Julia, Estill, Janne, Keiser, Olivia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067948
_version_ 1785067321537069056
author Chipanta, David
Kapambwe, Sharon
Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda
Pascoe, Margaret
Amo-Agyei, Silas
Bohlius, Julia
Estill, Janne
Keiser, Olivia
author_facet Chipanta, David
Kapambwe, Sharon
Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda
Pascoe, Margaret
Amo-Agyei, Silas
Bohlius, Julia
Estill, Janne
Keiser, Olivia
author_sort Chipanta, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data. SETTING: Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Differences in screening rates were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions, controlling for age, residence, education and wealth. Inequalities in screening probability were estimated using marginal effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 25–49 years, reporting screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported screening rates, and their inequalities in percentage points, with differences of 20%+ defined as high inequality, 5%–20% as medium, 0%–5% as low. RESULTS: The sample size of participants ranged from 5882 in Ethiopia to 9186 in Tanzania. The screening rates were low in the surveyed countries, ranging from 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.0%) in Rwanda to 17.1% (95% CI 15.8% to 18.5%) and 17.4% (95% CI 16.1% to 18.8%) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Inequalities in screening rates were low based on covariates. Combining the inequalities led to significant inequalities in screening probabilities between women living in rural areas aged 25–34 years, with a primary education level, from the lowest wealth quintile, and women living in urban areas aged 35–49 years, with the highest education level, from the highest wealth quintile, ranging from 4.4% in Rwanda to 44.6% in Zimbabwe. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical precancer screening rates were inequitable and low. No country surveyed achieved one-third of the WHO’s target of screening 70% of eligible women by 2030. Combining inequalities led to high inequalities, preventing women who were younger, lived in rural areas, were uneducated, and from the lowest wealth quintile from screening. Governments should include and monitor equity in their cervical precancer screening programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103144952023-07-02 Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys Chipanta, David Kapambwe, Sharon Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda Pascoe, Margaret Amo-Agyei, Silas Bohlius, Julia Estill, Janne Keiser, Olivia BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: We examined age, residence, education and wealth inequalities and their combinations on cervical precancer screening probabilities for women. We hypothesised that inequalities in screening favoured women who were older, lived in urban areas, were more educated and wealthier. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment data. SETTING: Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Differences in screening rates were analysed using multivariable logistic regressions, controlling for age, residence, education and wealth. Inequalities in screening probability were estimated using marginal effects models. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 25–49 years, reporting screening. OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported screening rates, and their inequalities in percentage points, with differences of 20%+ defined as high inequality, 5%–20% as medium, 0%–5% as low. RESULTS: The sample size of participants ranged from 5882 in Ethiopia to 9186 in Tanzania. The screening rates were low in the surveyed countries, ranging from 3.5% (95% CI 3.1% to 4.0%) in Rwanda to 17.1% (95% CI 15.8% to 18.5%) and 17.4% (95% CI 16.1% to 18.8%) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Inequalities in screening rates were low based on covariates. Combining the inequalities led to significant inequalities in screening probabilities between women living in rural areas aged 25–34 years, with a primary education level, from the lowest wealth quintile, and women living in urban areas aged 35–49 years, with the highest education level, from the highest wealth quintile, ranging from 4.4% in Rwanda to 44.6% in Zimbabwe. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical precancer screening rates were inequitable and low. No country surveyed achieved one-third of the WHO’s target of screening 70% of eligible women by 2030. Combining inequalities led to high inequalities, preventing women who were younger, lived in rural areas, were uneducated, and from the lowest wealth quintile from screening. Governments should include and monitor equity in their cervical precancer screening programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10314495/ /pubmed/37339830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067948 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Chipanta, David
Kapambwe, Sharon
Nyondo-Mipando, Alinane Linda
Pascoe, Margaret
Amo-Agyei, Silas
Bohlius, Julia
Estill, Janne
Keiser, Olivia
Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe: analysis of Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment surveys
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in cervical precancer screening among women in ethiopia, malawi, rwanda, tanzania, zambia and zimbabwe: analysis of population-based hiv impact assessment surveys
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067948
work_keys_str_mv AT chipantadavid socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT kapambwesharon socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT nyondomipandoalinanelinda socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT pascoemargaret socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT amoagyeisilas socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT bohliusjulia socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT estilljanne socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys
AT keiserolivia socioeconomicinequalitiesincervicalprecancerscreeningamongwomeninethiopiamalawirwandatanzaniazambiaandzimbabweanalysisofpopulationbasedhivimpactassessmentsurveys