Cargando…

Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study

OBJECTIVES: Rural–urban healthcare disparities exist globally. Various countries have used a rurality index for evaluating the disparities. Although Japan has many remote islands and rural areas, no rurality index exists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Rurality Index for Japan (RIJ) for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneko, Makoto, Ikeda, Takaaki, Inoue, Machiko, Sugiyama, Kemmyo, Saito, Manabu, Ohta, Ryuichi, Cooray, Upul, Vingilis, Evelyn, Freeman, Thomas R, Mathews, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068800
_version_ 1785067337630613504
author Kaneko, Makoto
Ikeda, Takaaki
Inoue, Machiko
Sugiyama, Kemmyo
Saito, Manabu
Ohta, Ryuichi
Cooray, Upul
Vingilis, Evelyn
Freeman, Thomas R
Mathews, Maria
author_facet Kaneko, Makoto
Ikeda, Takaaki
Inoue, Machiko
Sugiyama, Kemmyo
Saito, Manabu
Ohta, Ryuichi
Cooray, Upul
Vingilis, Evelyn
Freeman, Thomas R
Mathews, Maria
author_sort Kaneko, Makoto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Rural–urban healthcare disparities exist globally. Various countries have used a rurality index for evaluating the disparities. Although Japan has many remote islands and rural areas, no rurality index exists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Rurality Index for Japan (RIJ) for healthcare research. DESIGN: We employed a modified Delphi method to determine the factors of the RIJ and assessed the validity. The study developed an Expert Panel including healthcare professionals and a patient who had expertise in rural healthcare. SETTING: The panel members were recruited from across Japan including remote islands, mountain areas and heavy snow areas. The panel recruited survey participants whom the panel considered to have expertise. PARTICIPANTS: The initial survey recruited 100 people, including rural healthcare providers, local government staff and residents. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors to include in the RIJ were identified by the Expert Panel and survey participants. We also conducted an exploratory factor analysis on the selected factors to determine the factor structure. Convergent validity was examined by calculating the correlation between the index for physician distribution and the RIJ. Criterion-related validity was assessed by calculating the correlation with average life expectancy. RESULTS: The response rate of the final survey round was 84.8%. From the Delphi surveys, four factors were selected for the RIJ: population density, direct distance to the nearest hospital, remote islands and whether weather influences access to the nearest hospital. We employed the factor loadings as the weight of each factor. The average RIJ of every zip code was 50.5. The correlation coefficient with the index for physician distribution was −0.45 (p<0.001), and the correlation coefficients with the life expectancies of men and women were −0.35 (p<0.001) and −0.12 (p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study developed the RIJ using a modified Delphi method. The index showed good validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103145742023-07-02 Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study Kaneko, Makoto Ikeda, Takaaki Inoue, Machiko Sugiyama, Kemmyo Saito, Manabu Ohta, Ryuichi Cooray, Upul Vingilis, Evelyn Freeman, Thomas R Mathews, Maria BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: Rural–urban healthcare disparities exist globally. Various countries have used a rurality index for evaluating the disparities. Although Japan has many remote islands and rural areas, no rurality index exists. This study aimed to develop and validate a Rurality Index for Japan (RIJ) for healthcare research. DESIGN: We employed a modified Delphi method to determine the factors of the RIJ and assessed the validity. The study developed an Expert Panel including healthcare professionals and a patient who had expertise in rural healthcare. SETTING: The panel members were recruited from across Japan including remote islands, mountain areas and heavy snow areas. The panel recruited survey participants whom the panel considered to have expertise. PARTICIPANTS: The initial survey recruited 100 people, including rural healthcare providers, local government staff and residents. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Factors to include in the RIJ were identified by the Expert Panel and survey participants. We also conducted an exploratory factor analysis on the selected factors to determine the factor structure. Convergent validity was examined by calculating the correlation between the index for physician distribution and the RIJ. Criterion-related validity was assessed by calculating the correlation with average life expectancy. RESULTS: The response rate of the final survey round was 84.8%. From the Delphi surveys, four factors were selected for the RIJ: population density, direct distance to the nearest hospital, remote islands and whether weather influences access to the nearest hospital. We employed the factor loadings as the weight of each factor. The average RIJ of every zip code was 50.5. The correlation coefficient with the index for physician distribution was −0.45 (p<0.001), and the correlation coefficients with the life expectancies of men and women were −0.35 (p<0.001) and −0.12 (p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study developed the RIJ using a modified Delphi method. The index showed good validity. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10314574/ /pubmed/37336534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068800 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Kaneko, Makoto
Ikeda, Takaaki
Inoue, Machiko
Sugiyama, Kemmyo
Saito, Manabu
Ohta, Ryuichi
Cooray, Upul
Vingilis, Evelyn
Freeman, Thomas R
Mathews, Maria
Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title_full Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title_fullStr Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title_short Development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in Japan: a modified Delphi study
title_sort development and validation of a rurality index for healthcare research in japan: a modified delphi study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068800
work_keys_str_mv AT kanekomakoto developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT ikedatakaaki developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT inouemachiko developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT sugiyamakemmyo developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT saitomanabu developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT ohtaryuichi developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT coorayupul developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT vingilisevelyn developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT freemanthomasr developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy
AT mathewsmaria developmentandvalidationofaruralityindexforhealthcareresearchinjapanamodifieddelphistudy