Cargando…

Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis

OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesise the results of primary qualitative studies on how community-dwelling older adults experience shared decision-making processes, express preferences and actively participate in care. DESIGN: Systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martínez-Angulo, Pablo, Rich-Ruiz, Manuel, Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E, López-Quero, Salvador
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071549
_version_ 1785067347616202752
author Martínez-Angulo, Pablo
Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E
López-Quero, Salvador
author_facet Martínez-Angulo, Pablo
Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E
López-Quero, Salvador
author_sort Martínez-Angulo, Pablo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesise the results of primary qualitative studies on how community-dwelling older adults experience shared decision-making processes, express preferences and actively participate in care. DESIGN: Systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis. METHODS: We focused on studies about community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 undergoing a health-disease process circumscribed to a primary healthcare setting, and the central theme should focus on either shared decision-making, expressing preferences or patient participation. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO (time publication frame 2012–2022). We excluded studies in those cases where the qualitative results were not analysed or unrelated to the phenomenon addressed, phenomena were not clear enough to be included or the setting did not occur in the community. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-synthesis. We appraised the quality of the selected studies through Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist. The metasummary comprised the frequency and intensity of qualitative patterns across the included studies. The meta-synthesis revealed four influential elements in their interaction: recognising personal qualities, facing professional characteristics, experiences of discrimination and a double-edged context. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomena studied were influenced by how older people approached their role in their binomial relationship with healthcare professionals. Those with a reinforced self-concept were better aware of health-disease-related situations regarding shared decision-making and the importance of being communicatively assertive. Professional characteristics were also crucial in how older people modulated their acting ability through their personality, communication skills and the approach healthcare professionals used towards older adults. Situations of discrimination generated through an imbalance of power inhibited the expression of preferences and hindered the active participation of older people. The context surrounding the participants influenced all these situations, key in tipping the balance between a therapeutic and a harmful side. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022363515.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103146192023-07-02 Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis Martínez-Angulo, Pablo Rich-Ruiz, Manuel Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E López-Quero, Salvador BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesise the results of primary qualitative studies on how community-dwelling older adults experience shared decision-making processes, express preferences and actively participate in care. DESIGN: Systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis. METHODS: We focused on studies about community-dwelling participants aged ≥65 undergoing a health-disease process circumscribed to a primary healthcare setting, and the central theme should focus on either shared decision-making, expressing preferences or patient participation. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycINFO (time publication frame 2012–2022). We excluded studies in those cases where the qualitative results were not analysed or unrelated to the phenomenon addressed, phenomena were not clear enough to be included or the setting did not occur in the community. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-synthesis. We appraised the quality of the selected studies through Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist. The metasummary comprised the frequency and intensity of qualitative patterns across the included studies. The meta-synthesis revealed four influential elements in their interaction: recognising personal qualities, facing professional characteristics, experiences of discrimination and a double-edged context. CONCLUSIONS: The phenomena studied were influenced by how older people approached their role in their binomial relationship with healthcare professionals. Those with a reinforced self-concept were better aware of health-disease-related situations regarding shared decision-making and the importance of being communicatively assertive. Professional characteristics were also crucial in how older people modulated their acting ability through their personality, communication skills and the approach healthcare professionals used towards older adults. Situations of discrimination generated through an imbalance of power inhibited the expression of preferences and hindered the active participation of older people. The context surrounding the participants influenced all these situations, key in tipping the balance between a therapeutic and a harmful side. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022363515. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10314619/ /pubmed/37344120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071549 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Nursing
Martínez-Angulo, Pablo
Rich-Ruiz, Manuel
Ventura-Puertos, Pedro E
López-Quero, Salvador
Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_short Integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
title_sort integrating shared decision-making, expressing preferences and active participation of older adults in primary care nursing: a systematic review of qualitative studies and qualitative meta-synthesis
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37344120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071549
work_keys_str_mv AT martinezangulopablo integratingshareddecisionmakingexpressingpreferencesandactiveparticipationofolderadultsinprimarycarenursingasystematicreviewofqualitativestudiesandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT richruizmanuel integratingshareddecisionmakingexpressingpreferencesandactiveparticipationofolderadultsinprimarycarenursingasystematicreviewofqualitativestudiesandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT venturapuertospedroe integratingshareddecisionmakingexpressingpreferencesandactiveparticipationofolderadultsinprimarycarenursingasystematicreviewofqualitativestudiesandqualitativemetasynthesis
AT lopezquerosalvador integratingshareddecisionmakingexpressingpreferencesandactiveparticipationofolderadultsinprimarycarenursingasystematicreviewofqualitativestudiesandqualitativemetasynthesis