Cargando…
Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158 |
_version_ | 1785067364396564480 |
---|---|
author | Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria García Elorrio, Ezequiel |
author_facet | Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria García Elorrio, Ezequiel |
author_sort | Irazola, Vilma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country. METHODS: We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers and catalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy. RESULTS: Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was 5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04293315. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10314692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103146922023-07-02 Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria García Elorrio, Ezequiel BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: Approximately 81% of deaths in Argentina are from chronic non-communicable diseases and 21% caused by cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cancer in Argentina. Even though CRC screening has been recommended for adults from 50 to 75 years old by using a faecal immunochemical test (FIT) annually, screening rates remain below 20% in the country. METHODS: We conducted an 18-month, two-arm, pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a quality improvement intervention, based on the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, considering barriers and catalysts to articulate theory and practice, to increase CRC screening rates using FITs at primary care level. The study involved ten public primary health centres in Mendoza province, Argentina. The primary outcome measure was the rate of effective CRC screening. Secondary outcomes were the rate of participants with a positive FIT, tests with invalid results and the rate of participants referred for colonoscopy. RESULTS: Screening was effective in 75% of the participants in the intervention arm vs 54.2% in the control arm, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.4, p=0.001). These results remained unchanged after adjusting for individual demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Regarding secondary outcomes, the overall prevalence of positive tests was 17.7% (21.1% in the control arm and 14.7% in the intervention arm, p=0.3648). The overall proportion of participants with inadequate test results was 5.2% (4.9% in the control arm vs 5.5% in the intervention arm, p=0.8516). All the participants with positive tests were referred for colonoscopy in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention based on quality improvement strategies proved to be highly successful in increasing effective CRC screening in Argentina’s primary care setting within the public healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04293315. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10314692/ /pubmed/37339820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Irazola, Vilma Santero, Marilina Sanchez, Mario Tristao, Ignez Ruiz, Juan Ignacio Spira, Cintia Ismael, Julia Cavallo, Ana Soledad Gutierrez, Laura Mazzaresi, Yanina Nadal, Ana Maria García Elorrio, Ezequiel Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title | Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | quality improvement intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening at the primary care setting: a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37339820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT irazolavilma qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT santeromarilina qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sanchezmario qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tristaoignez qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ruizjuanignacio qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT spiracintia qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ismaeljulia qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cavalloanasoledad qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gutierrezlaura qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mazzaresiyanina qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nadalanamaria qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT garciaelorrioezequiel qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT qualityimprovementinterventiontoincreasecolorectalcancerscreeningattheprimarycaresettingaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |