Cargando…

Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm

PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diessner, Joachim, Anders, Laura, Herbert, Saskia, Kiesel, Matthias, Bley, Thorsten, Schlaiss, Tanja, Sauer, Stephanie, Wöckel, Achim, Bartmann, Catharina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9
_version_ 1785067395618963456
author Diessner, Joachim
Anders, Laura
Herbert, Saskia
Kiesel, Matthias
Bley, Thorsten
Schlaiss, Tanja
Sauer, Stephanie
Wöckel, Achim
Bartmann, Catharina
author_facet Diessner, Joachim
Anders, Laura
Herbert, Saskia
Kiesel, Matthias
Bley, Thorsten
Schlaiss, Tanja
Sauer, Stephanie
Wöckel, Achim
Bartmann, Catharina
author_sort Diessner, Joachim
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patients compared to conventional imaging such as mammography and sonography. METHODS: Data for breast cancer patients with tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes having received surgery between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. All examinations (sonography, mammography, computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were interpreted by board-certified specialists in radiology. The sensitivity of different imaging modalities was calculated, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to detect variables influencing the detection of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: All included 382 breast cancer patients had received conventional imaging, while 52.61% of the patients had received cross-sectional imaging. The sensitivity of the combination of all imaging modalities was 68.89%. The combination of MRI and CT showed 63.83% and the combination of sonography and mammography showed 36.11% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate that cross-sectional imaging can improve the sensitivity of the detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Only the safe detection of these lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis enables the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby allowing access to prognosis and improving new post-neoadjuvant therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10314851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103148512023-07-03 Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm Diessner, Joachim Anders, Laura Herbert, Saskia Kiesel, Matthias Bley, Thorsten Schlaiss, Tanja Sauer, Stephanie Wöckel, Achim Bartmann, Catharina J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patients compared to conventional imaging such as mammography and sonography. METHODS: Data for breast cancer patients with tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes having received surgery between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. All examinations (sonography, mammography, computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were interpreted by board-certified specialists in radiology. The sensitivity of different imaging modalities was calculated, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to detect variables influencing the detection of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: All included 382 breast cancer patients had received conventional imaging, while 52.61% of the patients had received cross-sectional imaging. The sensitivity of the combination of all imaging modalities was 68.89%. The combination of MRI and CT showed 63.83% and the combination of sonography and mammography showed 36.11% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate that cross-sectional imaging can improve the sensitivity of the detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Only the safe detection of these lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis enables the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby allowing access to prognosis and improving new post-neoadjuvant therapies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10314851/ /pubmed/35948829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Diessner, Joachim
Anders, Laura
Herbert, Saskia
Kiesel, Matthias
Bley, Thorsten
Schlaiss, Tanja
Sauer, Stephanie
Wöckel, Achim
Bartmann, Catharina
Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title_full Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title_fullStr Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title_short Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
title_sort evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948829
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9
work_keys_str_mv AT diessnerjoachim evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT anderslaura evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT herbertsaskia evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT kieselmatthias evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT bleythorsten evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT schlaisstanja evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT sauerstephanie evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT wockelachim evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm
AT bartmanncatharina evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm