Cargando…
Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm
PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9 |
_version_ | 1785067395618963456 |
---|---|
author | Diessner, Joachim Anders, Laura Herbert, Saskia Kiesel, Matthias Bley, Thorsten Schlaiss, Tanja Sauer, Stephanie Wöckel, Achim Bartmann, Catharina |
author_facet | Diessner, Joachim Anders, Laura Herbert, Saskia Kiesel, Matthias Bley, Thorsten Schlaiss, Tanja Sauer, Stephanie Wöckel, Achim Bartmann, Catharina |
author_sort | Diessner, Joachim |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patients compared to conventional imaging such as mammography and sonography. METHODS: Data for breast cancer patients with tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes having received surgery between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. All examinations (sonography, mammography, computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were interpreted by board-certified specialists in radiology. The sensitivity of different imaging modalities was calculated, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to detect variables influencing the detection of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: All included 382 breast cancer patients had received conventional imaging, while 52.61% of the patients had received cross-sectional imaging. The sensitivity of the combination of all imaging modalities was 68.89%. The combination of MRI and CT showed 63.83% and the combination of sonography and mammography showed 36.11% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate that cross-sectional imaging can improve the sensitivity of the detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Only the safe detection of these lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis enables the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby allowing access to prognosis and improving new post-neoadjuvant therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10314851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103148512023-07-03 Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm Diessner, Joachim Anders, Laura Herbert, Saskia Kiesel, Matthias Bley, Thorsten Schlaiss, Tanja Sauer, Stephanie Wöckel, Achim Bartmann, Catharina J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: The reliable detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer [BC] patients plays a decisive role in further therapy. We aimed to find out whether cross-sectional imaging techniques could improve sensitivity for pretherapeutic axillary staging in nodal-positive BC patients compared to conventional imaging such as mammography and sonography. METHODS: Data for breast cancer patients with tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes having received surgery between 2014 and 2020 were included in this study. All examinations (sonography, mammography, computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were interpreted by board-certified specialists in radiology. The sensitivity of different imaging modalities was calculated, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to detect variables influencing the detection of positive lymph nodes. RESULTS: All included 382 breast cancer patients had received conventional imaging, while 52.61% of the patients had received cross-sectional imaging. The sensitivity of the combination of all imaging modalities was 68.89%. The combination of MRI and CT showed 63.83% and the combination of sonography and mammography showed 36.11% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: We could demonstrate that cross-sectional imaging can improve the sensitivity of the detection of tumor-infiltrated axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Only the safe detection of these lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis enables the evaluation of the response to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby allowing access to prognosis and improving new post-neoadjuvant therapies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10314851/ /pubmed/35948829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Diessner, Joachim Anders, Laura Herbert, Saskia Kiesel, Matthias Bley, Thorsten Schlaiss, Tanja Sauer, Stephanie Wöckel, Achim Bartmann, Catharina Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title | Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title_full | Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title_short | Evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
title_sort | evaluation of different imaging modalities for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients to provide a personalized and optimized therapy algorithm |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35948829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04221-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diessnerjoachim evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT anderslaura evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT herbertsaskia evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT kieselmatthias evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT bleythorsten evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT schlaisstanja evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT sauerstephanie evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT wockelachim evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm AT bartmanncatharina evaluationofdifferentimagingmodalitiesforaxillarylymphnodestaginginbreastcancerpatientstoprovideapersonalizedandoptimizedtherapyalgorithm |