Body composition dynamics and impact on clinical outcome in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy with the FLOT protocol

PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT constitutes a standard of care approach for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed at investigating anthropometric, CT-based and FDG-PET-based body composition parameters and dynamics during this multidi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huemer, Florian, Hecht, Stefan, Scharinger, Bernhard, Schlintl, Verena, Rinnerthaler, Gabriel, Schlick, Konstantin, Heregger, Ronald, Melchardt, Thomas, Wimmer, Angela, Mühlbacher, Iris, Koch, Oliver Owen, Neureiter, Daniel, Klieser, Eckhard, Seyedinia, Sara, Beheshti, Mohsen, Greil, Richard, Weiss, Lukas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT constitutes a standard of care approach for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed at investigating anthropometric, CT-based and FDG-PET-based body composition parameters and dynamics during this multidisciplinary approach and the impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study was based on medical records and (FDG-PET)-CT images among gastric/GEJ cancer patients undergoing perioperative FLOT chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2021, 46 gastric/GEJ cancer patients started perioperative FLOT at our tertiary cancer center (Salzburg, Austria). At a median follow-up of 32 months median PFS was 47.4 months and median OS was not reached. The skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm(2)/m(2)) turned out to be the only body composition parameter with a statistically significant decrease during pre-operative FLOT (51.3 versus 48.8 cm(2)/m(2), p = 0.02). Neither pre-FLOT body mass index (BMI), nor SMI had an impact on the duration of pre-operative FLOT, the time interval from pre-operative FLOT initiation to surgery, the necessity of pre-operative or post-operative FLOT de-escalation or the likelihood of the start of postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-FLOT BMI (overweight versus normal, HR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.65, p = 0.02) and pre-FLOT SMI (sarcopenia versus no sarcopenia, HR: 5.08, 95% CI: 1.27–20.31, p = 0.02) were statistically significantly associated with PFS in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The statistically significant SMI loss during pre-operative FLOT and the meaningful impact of baseline SMI and BMI on PFS argue for the implementation of a nutritional screening and support program prior to the initiation of pre-operative FLOT in clinical routine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w.

Ejemplares similares