Cargando…

Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress

Introduction: One-quarter of alert, non-delirious patients in critical care units report significant psychological distress. Treatment of this distress depends upon identifying these high-risk patients. Our aim was to characterize how many critical care patients remain alert and without delirium for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadler, Rachel A, Dexter, Franklin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404410
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39859
_version_ 1785067422224482304
author Hadler, Rachel A
Dexter, Franklin
author_facet Hadler, Rachel A
Dexter, Franklin
author_sort Hadler, Rachel A
collection PubMed
description Introduction: One-quarter of alert, non-delirious patients in critical care units report significant psychological distress. Treatment of this distress depends upon identifying these high-risk patients. Our aim was to characterize how many critical care patients remain alert and without delirium for at least two consecutive days and could thus predictably undergo evaluation for distress. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from a large teaching hospital in the United States of America, from October 2014 to March 2022. Patients were included if they were admitted to one of three intensive care units, and for >48 hours all delirium and sedation screenings were negative (Riker sedation-agitation scale four, calm and cooperative, and no delirium based on all Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit scores negative and all Delirium Observation Screening Scale less than three). Means and standard deviations of means for counts and percentages are reported among the most recent six quarters. Means and standard deviations of means for lengths of stay were calculated among all N=30 quarters. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate the lower 99% confidence limit for the percentages of patients who would have had at most one assessment of dignity-related distress before intensive care unit discharge or change in mental status. Results: An average of 3.6 (standard deviation 0.2) new patients met the criteria daily. The percentages of all critical care patients (20%, standard deviation 2%) and hours (18%, standard deviation 2%) meeting criteria decreased slightly over the 7.5 years. Patients spent a mean of 3.8 (standard deviation 0.1) days awake in critical care before their condition or site changed. In the context of assessing distress and potentially treating it before the date of change of condition (e.g., transfer), 66% (6818/10314) of patients would have zero or one assessment, lower 99% confidence limit of 65%. Conclusions: Approximately one-fifth of critically ill patients are alert and without delirium and thus could be evaluated for distress during their intensive care unit stay, mostly during a single visit. These estimates can be used to guide workforce planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10315008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103150082023-07-03 Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress Hadler, Rachel A Dexter, Franklin Cureus Anesthesiology Introduction: One-quarter of alert, non-delirious patients in critical care units report significant psychological distress. Treatment of this distress depends upon identifying these high-risk patients. Our aim was to characterize how many critical care patients remain alert and without delirium for at least two consecutive days and could thus predictably undergo evaluation for distress. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from a large teaching hospital in the United States of America, from October 2014 to March 2022. Patients were included if they were admitted to one of three intensive care units, and for >48 hours all delirium and sedation screenings were negative (Riker sedation-agitation scale four, calm and cooperative, and no delirium based on all Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit scores negative and all Delirium Observation Screening Scale less than three). Means and standard deviations of means for counts and percentages are reported among the most recent six quarters. Means and standard deviations of means for lengths of stay were calculated among all N=30 quarters. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate the lower 99% confidence limit for the percentages of patients who would have had at most one assessment of dignity-related distress before intensive care unit discharge or change in mental status. Results: An average of 3.6 (standard deviation 0.2) new patients met the criteria daily. The percentages of all critical care patients (20%, standard deviation 2%) and hours (18%, standard deviation 2%) meeting criteria decreased slightly over the 7.5 years. Patients spent a mean of 3.8 (standard deviation 0.1) days awake in critical care before their condition or site changed. In the context of assessing distress and potentially treating it before the date of change of condition (e.g., transfer), 66% (6818/10314) of patients would have zero or one assessment, lower 99% confidence limit of 65%. Conclusions: Approximately one-fifth of critically ill patients are alert and without delirium and thus could be evaluated for distress during their intensive care unit stay, mostly during a single visit. These estimates can be used to guide workforce planning. Cureus 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10315008/ /pubmed/37404410 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39859 Text en Copyright © 2023, Hadler et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Hadler, Rachel A
Dexter, Franklin
Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title_full Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title_fullStr Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title_full_unstemmed Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title_short Forecasting Caseload of Critically Ill Patients Who Are Alert and Without Delirium for at Least Two Consecutive Days for the Assessment of Their Psychological Distress
title_sort forecasting caseload of critically ill patients who are alert and without delirium for at least two consecutive days for the assessment of their psychological distress
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404410
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39859
work_keys_str_mv AT hadlerrachela forecastingcaseloadofcriticallyillpatientswhoarealertandwithoutdeliriumforatleasttwoconsecutivedaysfortheassessmentoftheirpsychologicaldistress
AT dexterfranklin forecastingcaseloadofcriticallyillpatientswhoarealertandwithoutdeliriumforatleasttwoconsecutivedaysfortheassessmentoftheirpsychologicaldistress