Cargando…
Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the performance of ten predictive models using different machine learning (ML) algorithms and compare the performance of models developed using patient-specific vs. situational variables in predicting select outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: Data from 2016...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37393281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2 |
_version_ | 1785067425439416320 |
---|---|
author | Zalikha, Abdul K. Court, Tannor Nham, Fong El-Othmani, Mouhanad M. Shah, Roshan P. |
author_facet | Zalikha, Abdul K. Court, Tannor Nham, Fong El-Othmani, Mouhanad M. Shah, Roshan P. |
author_sort | Zalikha, Abdul K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the performance of ten predictive models using different machine learning (ML) algorithms and compare the performance of models developed using patient-specific vs. situational variables in predicting select outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: Data from 2016 to 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample were used to identify 305,577 discharges undergoing primary TKA, which were included in the training, testing, and validation of 10 ML models. 15 predictive variables consisting of 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were utilized to predict length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. Using the best performing algorithms, models trained using either 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were then developed and compared. RESULTS: For models developed using all 15 variables, Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) was the most responsive model for predicting LOS. LSVM and XGT Boost Tree were equivalently most responsive for predicting discharge disposition. LSVM and XGT Boost Linear were equivalently most responsive for predicting mortality. Decision List, CHAID, and LSVM were the most reliable models for predicting LOS and discharge disposition, while XGT Boost Tree, Decision List, LSVM, and CHAID were most reliable for mortality. Models developed using the 8 patient-specific variables outperformed those developed using the 7 situational variables, with few exceptions. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that performance of different models varied, ranging from poor to excellent, and demonstrated that models developed using patient-specific variables were typically better predictive of quality metrics after TKA than those developed employing situational variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10315023 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103150232023-07-03 Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables Zalikha, Abdul K. Court, Tannor Nham, Fong El-Othmani, Mouhanad M. Shah, Roshan P. Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the performance of ten predictive models using different machine learning (ML) algorithms and compare the performance of models developed using patient-specific vs. situational variables in predicting select outcomes after primary TKA. METHODS: Data from 2016 to 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample were used to identify 305,577 discharges undergoing primary TKA, which were included in the training, testing, and validation of 10 ML models. 15 predictive variables consisting of 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were utilized to predict length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and mortality. Using the best performing algorithms, models trained using either 8 patient-specific and 7 situational variables were then developed and compared. RESULTS: For models developed using all 15 variables, Linear Support Vector Machine (LSVM) was the most responsive model for predicting LOS. LSVM and XGT Boost Tree were equivalently most responsive for predicting discharge disposition. LSVM and XGT Boost Linear were equivalently most responsive for predicting mortality. Decision List, CHAID, and LSVM were the most reliable models for predicting LOS and discharge disposition, while XGT Boost Tree, Decision List, LSVM, and CHAID were most reliable for mortality. Models developed using the 8 patient-specific variables outperformed those developed using the 7 situational variables, with few exceptions. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that performance of different models varied, ranging from poor to excellent, and demonstrated that models developed using patient-specific variables were typically better predictive of quality metrics after TKA than those developed employing situational variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2. BioMed Central 2023-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10315023/ /pubmed/37393281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Zalikha, Abdul K. Court, Tannor Nham, Fong El-Othmani, Mouhanad M. Shah, Roshan P. Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title | Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title_full | Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title_fullStr | Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title_short | Improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
title_sort | improved performance of machine learning models in predicting length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient mortality after total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific variables |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315023/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37393281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00187-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zalikhaabdulk improvedperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsinpredictinglengthofstaydischargedispositionandinpatientmortalityaftertotalkneearthroplastyusingpatientspecificvariables AT courttannor improvedperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsinpredictinglengthofstaydischargedispositionandinpatientmortalityaftertotalkneearthroplastyusingpatientspecificvariables AT nhamfong improvedperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsinpredictinglengthofstaydischargedispositionandinpatientmortalityaftertotalkneearthroplastyusingpatientspecificvariables AT elothmanimouhanadm improvedperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsinpredictinglengthofstaydischargedispositionandinpatientmortalityaftertotalkneearthroplastyusingpatientspecificvariables AT shahroshanp improvedperformanceofmachinelearningmodelsinpredictinglengthofstaydischargedispositionandinpatientmortalityaftertotalkneearthroplastyusingpatientspecificvariables |