Cargando…

Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients

INTRODUCTION: Dronabinol is approved in the USA for chemotherapy-induced nausea as well as vomiting and HIV-induced anorexia, while cannabidiol is primarily approved for childhood epileptic disorders Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome. The use pattern for these prescription cannabinoids in the USA i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Edward Y., McCall, Kenneth L., Piper, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531058
_version_ 1785067456888307712
author Liu, Edward Y.
McCall, Kenneth L.
Piper, Brian J.
author_facet Liu, Edward Y.
McCall, Kenneth L.
Piper, Brian J.
author_sort Liu, Edward Y.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dronabinol is approved in the USA for chemotherapy-induced nausea as well as vomiting and HIV-induced anorexia, while cannabidiol is primarily approved for childhood epileptic disorders Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome. The use pattern for these prescription cannabinoids in the USA is unknown. This study examined Medicaid claims for two FDA-approved prescription cannabinoids, dronabinol and cannabidiol, approved in 1985 and 2018, respectively, from 2016–2020 to better understand the pharmacoepidemiologic trends and distribution of these drugs in US Medicaid amidst the increasing use of non-pharmaceutical formulations of cannabis. METHODS: The longitudinal study analyzed Medicaid prescription claims that were calculated by extracting the prescriptions on a state level from 2016 to 2020 for two cannabinoids, dronabinol and cannabidiol, where outcomes over each year were calculated. Outcomes were (1) the number of prescriptions for each state corrected for the number of Medicaid enrollees and (2) dronabinol and cannabidiol spending. Spending refers to the amount reimbursed by the state Medicaid program. RESULTS: Dronabinol prescriptions per state decreased by 25.3% from 2016 to 2020, while cannabidiol prescriptions increased by 16,272.99% from 2018 to 2020. The spending on these drugs parallels that of their prescription trend with a 66.3% decrease in reimbursement for dronabinol ($5.7 million in 2020), whereas cannabidiol increased by +26,582.0% ($233.3 million in 2020). Dronabinol prescriptions, when corrected for the number of enrollees, in Connecticut were 136.4 times larger than in New Mexico, and seventeen states had zero prescriptions. Idaho’s prescriptions of cannabidiol (27.8/10,000 enrollees) were significantly elevated relative to the national average and were 15.4-fold higher than Washington, DC (1.8/10K enrollees). CONCLUSIONS: The prescriptions of pharmaceutical-grade tetrahydrocannabinol decreased while those of cannabidiol increased. This study also identified pronounced state-level variation in cannabinoid prescribing to Medicaid patients. State formularies and prescription drug list variation may contribute to the drug reimbursements in Medicaid, though further research is needed to identify the health policy or pharmacoeconomic origins of these disparities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10315157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103151572023-07-03 Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients Liu, Edward Y. McCall, Kenneth L. Piper, Brian J. Med Cannabis Cannabinoids Preclinical Science and Clinical Studies – Research Article INTRODUCTION: Dronabinol is approved in the USA for chemotherapy-induced nausea as well as vomiting and HIV-induced anorexia, while cannabidiol is primarily approved for childhood epileptic disorders Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome. The use pattern for these prescription cannabinoids in the USA is unknown. This study examined Medicaid claims for two FDA-approved prescription cannabinoids, dronabinol and cannabidiol, approved in 1985 and 2018, respectively, from 2016–2020 to better understand the pharmacoepidemiologic trends and distribution of these drugs in US Medicaid amidst the increasing use of non-pharmaceutical formulations of cannabis. METHODS: The longitudinal study analyzed Medicaid prescription claims that were calculated by extracting the prescriptions on a state level from 2016 to 2020 for two cannabinoids, dronabinol and cannabidiol, where outcomes over each year were calculated. Outcomes were (1) the number of prescriptions for each state corrected for the number of Medicaid enrollees and (2) dronabinol and cannabidiol spending. Spending refers to the amount reimbursed by the state Medicaid program. RESULTS: Dronabinol prescriptions per state decreased by 25.3% from 2016 to 2020, while cannabidiol prescriptions increased by 16,272.99% from 2018 to 2020. The spending on these drugs parallels that of their prescription trend with a 66.3% decrease in reimbursement for dronabinol ($5.7 million in 2020), whereas cannabidiol increased by +26,582.0% ($233.3 million in 2020). Dronabinol prescriptions, when corrected for the number of enrollees, in Connecticut were 136.4 times larger than in New Mexico, and seventeen states had zero prescriptions. Idaho’s prescriptions of cannabidiol (27.8/10,000 enrollees) were significantly elevated relative to the national average and were 15.4-fold higher than Washington, DC (1.8/10K enrollees). CONCLUSIONS: The prescriptions of pharmaceutical-grade tetrahydrocannabinol decreased while those of cannabidiol increased. This study also identified pronounced state-level variation in cannabinoid prescribing to Medicaid patients. State formularies and prescription drug list variation may contribute to the drug reimbursements in Medicaid, though further research is needed to identify the health policy or pharmacoeconomic origins of these disparities. S. Karger AG 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10315157/ /pubmed/37404688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531058 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Preclinical Science and Clinical Studies – Research Article
Liu, Edward Y.
McCall, Kenneth L.
Piper, Brian J.
Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title_full Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title_fullStr Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title_full_unstemmed Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title_short Pronounced State-Level Disparities in Prescription of Cannabinoids to Medicaid Patients
title_sort pronounced state-level disparities in prescription of cannabinoids to medicaid patients
topic Preclinical Science and Clinical Studies – Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531058
work_keys_str_mv AT liuedwardy pronouncedstateleveldisparitiesinprescriptionofcannabinoidstomedicaidpatients
AT mccallkennethl pronouncedstateleveldisparitiesinprescriptionofcannabinoidstomedicaidpatients
AT piperbrianj pronouncedstateleveldisparitiesinprescriptionofcannabinoidstomedicaidpatients