Cargando…

Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity after pancreatic surgery. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage (EUS‐TD) has been widely used to manage pancreatic pseudocysts after acute pancreatitis. Several studies have reported the effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyamoto, Ryoichi, Takahashi, Amane, Ogura, Toshiro, Kitamura, Kei, Ishida, Hiroyuki, Matsudaira, Shinichi, Suzuki, Yuko, Shimizu, Satoshi, Kawashima, Yoshiyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.270
_version_ 1785067539975372800
author Miyamoto, Ryoichi
Takahashi, Amane
Ogura, Toshiro
Kitamura, Kei
Ishida, Hiroyuki
Matsudaira, Shinichi
Suzuki, Yuko
Shimizu, Satoshi
Kawashima, Yoshiyuki
author_facet Miyamoto, Ryoichi
Takahashi, Amane
Ogura, Toshiro
Kitamura, Kei
Ishida, Hiroyuki
Matsudaira, Shinichi
Suzuki, Yuko
Shimizu, Satoshi
Kawashima, Yoshiyuki
author_sort Miyamoto, Ryoichi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity after pancreatic surgery. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage (EUS‐TD) has been widely used to manage pancreatic pseudocysts after acute pancreatitis. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of EUS‐TD for POPF, although there is insufficient evidence regarding the performance of EUS‐TD for POPF. We herein report on the safety, efficacy, and appropriate timing of EUS‐TD for POPF compared with conventional percutaneous intervention. METHODS: Eight patients who underwent EUS‐TD of POPF and 36 patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical outcomes, including technical success, clinical success, and complications, were analyzed among the two groups. RESULTS: In terms of clinical outcomes between the EUS‐TD and percutaneous intervention groups, significant differences were observed in the number of interventions (1 vs. 4, p = 0.011), period of clinical success (6 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.001), incidence of complications (0 vs. 3, p = 0.021), postoperative hospital stays (27 days vs. 34 days, p = 0.027), and recurrence of POPF (0 vs. 5, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EUS‐TD for POPF appears to be safe and technically feasible. This approach should be considered a therapeutic option in patients with POPF after pancreatic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10315642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103156422023-07-04 Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery Miyamoto, Ryoichi Takahashi, Amane Ogura, Toshiro Kitamura, Kei Ishida, Hiroyuki Matsudaira, Shinichi Suzuki, Yuko Shimizu, Satoshi Kawashima, Yoshiyuki DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity after pancreatic surgery. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage (EUS‐TD) has been widely used to manage pancreatic pseudocysts after acute pancreatitis. Several studies have reported the effectiveness of EUS‐TD for POPF, although there is insufficient evidence regarding the performance of EUS‐TD for POPF. We herein report on the safety, efficacy, and appropriate timing of EUS‐TD for POPF compared with conventional percutaneous intervention. METHODS: Eight patients who underwent EUS‐TD of POPF and 36 patients who underwent percutaneous intervention were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical outcomes, including technical success, clinical success, and complications, were analyzed among the two groups. RESULTS: In terms of clinical outcomes between the EUS‐TD and percutaneous intervention groups, significant differences were observed in the number of interventions (1 vs. 4, p = 0.011), period of clinical success (6 days vs. 11 days, p = 0.001), incidence of complications (0 vs. 3, p = 0.021), postoperative hospital stays (27 days vs. 34 days, p = 0.027), and recurrence of POPF (0 vs. 5, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: EUS‐TD for POPF appears to be safe and technically feasible. This approach should be considered a therapeutic option in patients with POPF after pancreatic surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10315642/ /pubmed/37404728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.270 Text en © 2023 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Miyamoto, Ryoichi
Takahashi, Amane
Ogura, Toshiro
Kitamura, Kei
Ishida, Hiroyuki
Matsudaira, Shinichi
Suzuki, Yuko
Shimizu, Satoshi
Kawashima, Yoshiyuki
Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title_full Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title_fullStr Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title_short Impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
title_sort impact of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided transmural drainage for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.270
work_keys_str_mv AT miyamotoryoichi impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT takahashiamane impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT oguratoshiro impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT kitamurakei impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT ishidahiroyuki impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT matsudairashinichi impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT suzukiyuko impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT shimizusatoshi impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery
AT kawashimayoshiyuki impactofendoscopicultrasoundguidedtransmuraldrainageforpostoperativepancreaticfistulaafterpancreaticsurgery