Cargando…
Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
INTRODUCTION: KRAS mutation is a common occurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is a driver mutation for disease development and progression. KRAS wild-type PDA may constitute a distinct molecular and clinical subtype. We used the Foundation one data to analyze the difference in Gen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169586 |
_version_ | 1785067546453475328 |
---|---|
author | Ashok Kumar, Prashanth Serinelli, Serenella Zaccarini, Daniel J. Huang, Richard Danziger, Natalie Janovitz, Tyler Basnet, Alina Sivapiragasam, Abirami Graziano, Stephen Ross, Jeffrey S. |
author_facet | Ashok Kumar, Prashanth Serinelli, Serenella Zaccarini, Daniel J. Huang, Richard Danziger, Natalie Janovitz, Tyler Basnet, Alina Sivapiragasam, Abirami Graziano, Stephen Ross, Jeffrey S. |
author_sort | Ashok Kumar, Prashanth |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: KRAS mutation is a common occurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is a driver mutation for disease development and progression. KRAS wild-type PDA may constitute a distinct molecular and clinical subtype. We used the Foundation one data to analyze the difference in Genomic Alterations (GAs) that occur in KRAS mutated and wild-type PDA. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) and PD-L1 by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) were analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our cohort had 9444 cases of advanced PDA. 8723 (92.37%) patients had KRAS mutation. 721 (7.63%) patients were KRAS wild-type. Among potentially targetable mutations, GAs more common in KRAS wild-type included ERBB2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.7% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001), BRAF (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 17.9%, p <0.0001), PIK3CA (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.001), FGFR2 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.1% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001), ATM (mutated vs wild-type: 3.6% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001). On analyzing untargetable GAs, the KRAS mutated group had a significantly higher percentage of TP53 (mutated vs wild-type: 80.2% vs 47.6%, p <0.0001), CDKN2A (mutated vs wild-type: 56.2% vs 34.4%, p <0.0001), CDKN2B (mutated vs wild-type: 28.9% vs 23%, p =0.007), SMAD4 (mutated vs wild-type: 26.8% vs 15.7%, p <0.0001) and MTAP (mutated vs wild-type: 21.7% vs 18%, p =0.02). ARID1A (mutated vs wild-type: 7.7% vs 13.6%, p <0.0001 and RB1(mutated vs wild-type: 2% vs 4%, p =0.01) were more prevalent in the wild-type subgroup. Mean TMB was higher in the KRAS wild-type subgroup (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3 vs 3.6, p <0.0001). High TMB, defined as TMB > 10 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 1% vs 6.3%, p <0.0001) and very-high TMB, defined as TMB >20 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 2.4%, p <0.0001) favored the wild-type. PD-L1 high expression was similar between the 2 groups (mutated vs wild-type: 5.7% vs 6%,). GA associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) response including PBRM1 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.7% vs 3.2%, p <0.0001) and MDM2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.3% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001) were more likely to be seen in KRAS wild-type PDA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10315669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103156692023-07-04 Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Ashok Kumar, Prashanth Serinelli, Serenella Zaccarini, Daniel J. Huang, Richard Danziger, Natalie Janovitz, Tyler Basnet, Alina Sivapiragasam, Abirami Graziano, Stephen Ross, Jeffrey S. Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: KRAS mutation is a common occurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is a driver mutation for disease development and progression. KRAS wild-type PDA may constitute a distinct molecular and clinical subtype. We used the Foundation one data to analyze the difference in Genomic Alterations (GAs) that occur in KRAS mutated and wild-type PDA. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) and PD-L1 by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) were analyzed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our cohort had 9444 cases of advanced PDA. 8723 (92.37%) patients had KRAS mutation. 721 (7.63%) patients were KRAS wild-type. Among potentially targetable mutations, GAs more common in KRAS wild-type included ERBB2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.7% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001), BRAF (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 17.9%, p <0.0001), PIK3CA (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.001), FGFR2 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.1% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001), ATM (mutated vs wild-type: 3.6% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001). On analyzing untargetable GAs, the KRAS mutated group had a significantly higher percentage of TP53 (mutated vs wild-type: 80.2% vs 47.6%, p <0.0001), CDKN2A (mutated vs wild-type: 56.2% vs 34.4%, p <0.0001), CDKN2B (mutated vs wild-type: 28.9% vs 23%, p =0.007), SMAD4 (mutated vs wild-type: 26.8% vs 15.7%, p <0.0001) and MTAP (mutated vs wild-type: 21.7% vs 18%, p =0.02). ARID1A (mutated vs wild-type: 7.7% vs 13.6%, p <0.0001 and RB1(mutated vs wild-type: 2% vs 4%, p =0.01) were more prevalent in the wild-type subgroup. Mean TMB was higher in the KRAS wild-type subgroup (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3 vs 3.6, p <0.0001). High TMB, defined as TMB > 10 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 1% vs 6.3%, p <0.0001) and very-high TMB, defined as TMB >20 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 2.4%, p <0.0001) favored the wild-type. PD-L1 high expression was similar between the 2 groups (mutated vs wild-type: 5.7% vs 6%,). GA associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) response including PBRM1 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.7% vs 3.2%, p <0.0001) and MDM2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.3% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001) were more likely to be seen in KRAS wild-type PDA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10315669/ /pubmed/37404765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169586 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ashok Kumar, Serinelli, Zaccarini, Huang, Danziger, Janovitz, Basnet, Sivapiragasam, Graziano and Ross https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Ashok Kumar, Prashanth Serinelli, Serenella Zaccarini, Daniel J. Huang, Richard Danziger, Natalie Janovitz, Tyler Basnet, Alina Sivapiragasam, Abirami Graziano, Stephen Ross, Jeffrey S. Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title | Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full | Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_fullStr | Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_short | Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
title_sort | genomic landscape of clinically advanced kras wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404765 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1169586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashokkumarprashanth genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT serinelliserenella genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT zaccarinidanielj genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT huangrichard genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT danzigernatalie genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT janovitztyler genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT basnetalina genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT sivapiragasamabirami genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT grazianostephen genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma AT rossjeffreys genomiclandscapeofclinicallyadvancedkraswildtypepancreaticductaladenocarcinoma |