Cargando…
Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems
INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health (OH) challenge. To achieve or maintain an effective and efficient AMR surveillance system, it is crucial to evaluate its performance in meeting the proposed objectives, while complying with resource restrictions. The OH-EpiCap tool was cre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645 |
_version_ | 1785067599167488000 |
---|---|
author | Moura, Pedro Collineau, Lucie Sandberg, Marianne Tomassone, Laura De Meneghi, Daniele Norström, Madelaine Bennani, Houda Häsler, Barbara Colomb-Cotinat, Mélanie Bourély, Clémence Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Mediouni, Sarah Boriani, Elena Asaduzzaman, Muhammad Caniça, Manuela Aenishaenslin, Cécile Alban, Lis |
author_facet | Moura, Pedro Collineau, Lucie Sandberg, Marianne Tomassone, Laura De Meneghi, Daniele Norström, Madelaine Bennani, Houda Häsler, Barbara Colomb-Cotinat, Mélanie Bourély, Clémence Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Mediouni, Sarah Boriani, Elena Asaduzzaman, Muhammad Caniça, Manuela Aenishaenslin, Cécile Alban, Lis |
author_sort | Moura, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health (OH) challenge. To achieve or maintain an effective and efficient AMR surveillance system, it is crucial to evaluate its performance in meeting the proposed objectives, while complying with resource restrictions. The OH-EpiCap tool was created to evaluate the degree of compliance of hazard surveillance activities with essential OH concepts across the following dimensions: organization, operational activities, and impact of the surveillance system. We present feedback on the application of the OH-EpiCap tool from a user’s perspective, based on the use of the tool to evaluate nine national AMR surveillance systems, each with different contexts and objectives. METHODS: The OH-EpiCap was assessed using the updated CoEvalAMR methodology. This methodology allows the evaluation of the content themes and functional aspects of the tool and captures the user’s subjective experiences via a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results of the evaluation of the OH-EpiCap are presented and discussed. The OH-EpiCap is an easy-to-use tool, which can facilitate a fast macro-overview of the application of the OH concept to AMR surveillance. When used by specialists in the matter, an evaluation using OH-EpiCap can serve as a basis for the discussion of possible adaptations of AMR surveillance activities or targeting areas that may be further investigated using other evaluation tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10315896 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103158962023-07-04 Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems Moura, Pedro Collineau, Lucie Sandberg, Marianne Tomassone, Laura De Meneghi, Daniele Norström, Madelaine Bennani, Houda Häsler, Barbara Colomb-Cotinat, Mélanie Bourély, Clémence Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Mediouni, Sarah Boriani, Elena Asaduzzaman, Muhammad Caniça, Manuela Aenishaenslin, Cécile Alban, Lis Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health (OH) challenge. To achieve or maintain an effective and efficient AMR surveillance system, it is crucial to evaluate its performance in meeting the proposed objectives, while complying with resource restrictions. The OH-EpiCap tool was created to evaluate the degree of compliance of hazard surveillance activities with essential OH concepts across the following dimensions: organization, operational activities, and impact of the surveillance system. We present feedback on the application of the OH-EpiCap tool from a user’s perspective, based on the use of the tool to evaluate nine national AMR surveillance systems, each with different contexts and objectives. METHODS: The OH-EpiCap was assessed using the updated CoEvalAMR methodology. This methodology allows the evaluation of the content themes and functional aspects of the tool and captures the user’s subjective experiences via a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The results of the evaluation of the OH-EpiCap are presented and discussed. The OH-EpiCap is an easy-to-use tool, which can facilitate a fast macro-overview of the application of the OH concept to AMR surveillance. When used by specialists in the matter, an evaluation using OH-EpiCap can serve as a basis for the discussion of possible adaptations of AMR surveillance activities or targeting areas that may be further investigated using other evaluation tools. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10315896/ /pubmed/37404278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645 Text en Copyright © 2023 Moura, Collineau, Sandberg, Tomassone, De Meneghi, Norström, Bennani, Häsler, Colomb-Cotinat, Bourély, Filippitzi, Mediouni, Boriani, Asaduzzaman, Caniça, Aenishaenslin and Alban. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Moura, Pedro Collineau, Lucie Sandberg, Marianne Tomassone, Laura De Meneghi, Daniele Norström, Madelaine Bennani, Houda Häsler, Barbara Colomb-Cotinat, Mélanie Bourély, Clémence Filippitzi, Maria-Eleni Mediouni, Sarah Boriani, Elena Asaduzzaman, Muhammad Caniça, Manuela Aenishaenslin, Cécile Alban, Lis Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title | Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title_full | Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title_fullStr | Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title_short | Users’ perception of the OH-EpiCap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
title_sort | users’ perception of the oh-epicap evaluation tool based on its application to nine national antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1138645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mourapedro usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT collineaulucie usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT sandbergmarianne usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT tomassonelaura usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT demeneghidaniele usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT norstrommadelaine usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT bennanihouda usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT haslerbarbara usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT colombcotinatmelanie usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT bourelyclemence usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT filippitzimariaeleni usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT mediounisarah usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT borianielena usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT asaduzzamanmuhammad usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT canicamanuela usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT aenishaenslincecile usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems AT albanlis usersperceptionoftheohepicapevaluationtoolbasedonitsapplicationtoninenationalantimicrobialresistancesurveillancesystems |