Cargando…

Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations

BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a serious condition. A number of methods have been defined and used in surgical treatment. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of “primary repair” and “drain placement without repair” methods in duodenal perforations using an animal mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karataş, Turgay, Kanlıöz, Murat, Göktürk, Nurcan, Yıldız, Azibe, Karataş, Mehmet, Burak Selçuk, Engin, Çevirgen, Furkan, Türköz, Yusuf, Arslan, Ahmet Kadir, Özbağ, Davut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278083
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.92324
_version_ 1785067607259348992
author Karataş, Turgay
Kanlıöz, Murat
Göktürk, Nurcan
Yıldız, Azibe
Karataş, Mehmet
Burak Selçuk, Engin
Çevirgen, Furkan
Türköz, Yusuf
Arslan, Ahmet Kadir
Özbağ, Davut
author_facet Karataş, Turgay
Kanlıöz, Murat
Göktürk, Nurcan
Yıldız, Azibe
Karataş, Mehmet
Burak Selçuk, Engin
Çevirgen, Furkan
Türköz, Yusuf
Arslan, Ahmet Kadir
Özbağ, Davut
author_sort Karataş, Turgay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a serious condition. A number of methods have been defined and used in surgical treatment. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of “primary repair” and “drain placement without repair” methods in duodenal perforations using an animal model. METHODS: Three equivalent groups of ten rats each were formed. Perforation was created in the duodenum in the first (primary repair/sutured group) and the second group (drain placement without repair/sutureless drainage group). In the first group, the perforation was repaired with sutures. In the second group, only a drain was placed in the abdomen without sutures. In the third group (control group), only laparotomy was performed. Neutrophil count, sedimentation, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), serum total thiol, serum native thiol, and serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) analyses were performed on animal subjects in the pre-operative period and on the post-operative 1(st) and 7(th) days. Histological and immunohistochemical (transforming growth factor-beta 1 [TGF-β1]) analyzes were performed. Blood analysis, histological, and immunohistochemical findings obtained from the groups were compared statistically. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the first and second groups, except for the TAC on the post-operative 7(th) day and MPO values on the post-operative 1(st) day (P>0.05). Although tissue healing was more pronounced in the second group than in the first group, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). TGF-β1 immunoreactivity observed in the second group was found to be significantly higher than in the first group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: We think that the sutureless drainage method is as effective as the primary repair method in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation and can be safely applied as an alternative to the primary repair method. However, further studies are needed to fully determine the efficacy of the sutureless drainage method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10315930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103159302023-07-04 Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations Karataş, Turgay Kanlıöz, Murat Göktürk, Nurcan Yıldız, Azibe Karataş, Mehmet Burak Selçuk, Engin Çevirgen, Furkan Türköz, Yusuf Arslan, Ahmet Kadir Özbağ, Davut Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Experimental Study BACKGROUND: Duodenal ulcer perforation is a serious condition. A number of methods have been defined and used in surgical treatment. In this study, it was aimed to compare the effectiveness of “primary repair” and “drain placement without repair” methods in duodenal perforations using an animal model. METHODS: Three equivalent groups of ten rats each were formed. Perforation was created in the duodenum in the first (primary repair/sutured group) and the second group (drain placement without repair/sutureless drainage group). In the first group, the perforation was repaired with sutures. In the second group, only a drain was placed in the abdomen without sutures. In the third group (control group), only laparotomy was performed. Neutrophil count, sedimentation, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum total antioxidant capacity (TAC), serum total thiol, serum native thiol, and serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) analyses were performed on animal subjects in the pre-operative period and on the post-operative 1(st) and 7(th) days. Histological and immunohistochemical (transforming growth factor-beta 1 [TGF-β1]) analyzes were performed. Blood analysis, histological, and immunohistochemical findings obtained from the groups were compared statistically. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the first and second groups, except for the TAC on the post-operative 7(th) day and MPO values on the post-operative 1(st) day (P>0.05). Although tissue healing was more pronounced in the second group than in the first group, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). TGF-β1 immunoreactivity observed in the second group was found to be significantly higher than in the first group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: We think that the sutureless drainage method is as effective as the primary repair method in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation and can be safely applied as an alternative to the primary repair method. However, further studies are needed to fully determine the efficacy of the sutureless drainage method. Kare Publishing 2023-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10315930/ /pubmed/37278083 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.92324 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Experimental Study
Karataş, Turgay
Kanlıöz, Murat
Göktürk, Nurcan
Yıldız, Azibe
Karataş, Mehmet
Burak Selçuk, Engin
Çevirgen, Furkan
Türköz, Yusuf
Arslan, Ahmet Kadir
Özbağ, Davut
Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title_full Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title_fullStr Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title_short Comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
title_sort comparison of “primary repair” and “placing a drain without repair” methods in duodenum perforations
topic Experimental Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37278083
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.92324
work_keys_str_mv AT karatasturgay comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT kanlıozmurat comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT gokturknurcan comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT yıldızazibe comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT karatasmehmet comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT burakselcukengin comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT cevirgenfurkan comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT turkozyusuf comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT arslanahmetkadir comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations
AT ozbagdavut comparisonofprimaryrepairandplacingadrainwithoutrepairmethodsinduodenumperforations