Cargando…

Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters

The application of an electrochemical (impedance) tool for monitoring Escherichia coli contamination in shellfish was evaluated after 13 months of observation. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the standard most probable number (MPN) and μ-trac 4200 (log imped/100 g) for the assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Currò, Sarah, Fasolato, Luca, Balzan, Stefania, Biziato, Giacomo, Paesanti, Francesco, Bargelloni, Luca, Cardazzo, Barbara, Novelli, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.11103
_version_ 1785067668263403520
author Currò, Sarah
Fasolato, Luca
Balzan, Stefania
Biziato, Giacomo
Paesanti, Francesco
Bargelloni, Luca
Cardazzo, Barbara
Novelli, Enrico
author_facet Currò, Sarah
Fasolato, Luca
Balzan, Stefania
Biziato, Giacomo
Paesanti, Francesco
Bargelloni, Luca
Cardazzo, Barbara
Novelli, Enrico
author_sort Currò, Sarah
collection PubMed
description The application of an electrochemical (impedance) tool for monitoring Escherichia coli contamination in shellfish was evaluated after 13 months of observation. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the standard most probable number (MPN) and μ-trac 4200 (log imped/100 g) for the assessment of E. coli contamination (log MPN/100 g) in non-depurated bivalve mollusks (BM) from five sampling areas of the Veneto-Emilian coast (Italy) (118 samples). The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlation between E. coli concentrations in BM and environmental factors on a large data set (690). The methods showed a moderate, positive correlation (0.60 and 0.69 Pearson and Spearman coefficients, respectively; P<0.01) in Ruditapes philippinarum. The McNemar test indicated analogous sample classification between methods, and the impedance method overestimated the most contaminated class (P=0.03; >4,600 MPN/100 g). The results highlighted the suitability of the impedance method for a faster evaluation and routine use especially in clams, while in Mytilus it seemed less effective. Different models built by multivariate permutational variance analysis and multinomial logistic regression selected the suitable environmental features able to predict the E. coli load. Overall, salinity and season affected the E. coli contamination, whereas locally it was mainly influenced by hydrometry and salinity. The application of the impedance method coupled with environmental data analysis could help purification phase management to adhere to legal limits and could represent an advantage for local control authorities to define actions, considering extreme meteorological events’ effects as a proactive reaction to climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103162312023-07-04 Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters Currò, Sarah Fasolato, Luca Balzan, Stefania Biziato, Giacomo Paesanti, Francesco Bargelloni, Luca Cardazzo, Barbara Novelli, Enrico Ital J Food Saf Article The application of an electrochemical (impedance) tool for monitoring Escherichia coli contamination in shellfish was evaluated after 13 months of observation. The primary aim of the present study was to compare the standard most probable number (MPN) and μ-trac 4200 (log imped/100 g) for the assessment of E. coli contamination (log MPN/100 g) in non-depurated bivalve mollusks (BM) from five sampling areas of the Veneto-Emilian coast (Italy) (118 samples). The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlation between E. coli concentrations in BM and environmental factors on a large data set (690). The methods showed a moderate, positive correlation (0.60 and 0.69 Pearson and Spearman coefficients, respectively; P<0.01) in Ruditapes philippinarum. The McNemar test indicated analogous sample classification between methods, and the impedance method overestimated the most contaminated class (P=0.03; >4,600 MPN/100 g). The results highlighted the suitability of the impedance method for a faster evaluation and routine use especially in clams, while in Mytilus it seemed less effective. Different models built by multivariate permutational variance analysis and multinomial logistic regression selected the suitable environmental features able to predict the E. coli load. Overall, salinity and season affected the E. coli contamination, whereas locally it was mainly influenced by hydrometry and salinity. The application of the impedance method coupled with environmental data analysis could help purification phase management to adhere to legal limits and could represent an advantage for local control authorities to define actions, considering extreme meteorological events’ effects as a proactive reaction to climate change. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2023-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10316231/ /pubmed/37405147 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.11103 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Currò, Sarah
Fasolato, Luca
Balzan, Stefania
Biziato, Giacomo
Paesanti, Francesco
Bargelloni, Luca
Cardazzo, Barbara
Novelli, Enrico
Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title_full Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title_fullStr Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title_short Evaluating Escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
title_sort evaluating escherichia coli contamination in bivalve mollusks using the impedance method: a comparison with most probable number analyses and correlation with environmental parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405147
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2023.11103
work_keys_str_mv AT currosarah evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT fasolatoluca evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT balzanstefania evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT biziatogiacomo evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT paesantifrancesco evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT bargelloniluca evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT cardazzobarbara evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters
AT novellienrico evaluatingescherichiacolicontaminationinbivalvemollusksusingtheimpedancemethodacomparisonwithmostprobablenumberanalysesandcorrelationwithenvironmentalparameters