Cargando…

Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND: In severe cases of periprosthetic joint infection involving negative host-dependent factors, individual-based decisions between a curative therapy vs. salvage procedure are necessary. We aimed to review salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection cases, where a gold stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gramlich, Yves, Parvizi, Javad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37394449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00182-7
_version_ 1785067736134582272
author Gramlich, Yves
Parvizi, Javad
author_facet Gramlich, Yves
Parvizi, Javad
author_sort Gramlich, Yves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In severe cases of periprosthetic joint infection involving negative host-dependent factors, individual-based decisions between a curative therapy vs. salvage procedure are necessary. We aimed to review salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection cases, where a gold standard of a curative two-stage exchange can no longer be achieved. The options of knee arthrodesis, amputation, persistent fistula (stable drainage), or a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in late-onset cases are discussed, including lifelong antibiotic suppression alone. METHODS: We focused on known salvage procedures for severe periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee, such as amputation, arthrodesis, antibiotic suppression, persistent fistula, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in late-stage infections, and the role of local antibiotics. The current literature regarding indications and outcomes was reviewed. RESULTS: Whereas a successful single-stage above-knee amputation can be a curative effort in younger patients, this is associated with limited outcome in older patients, as the proportion who receive an exoprosthesis leading to independent mobility is low. Therefore, arthrodesis using an intramedullary modular nail is an option for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday life mobility, when revision total knee arthroplasty is not an option. Carrying out a persistent fistula using a stable drainage system, as well as a lifelong antibiotic suppression therapy, can be an option, in cases where no other surgery is possible. Active clinical surveillance should then be carried out. A debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in combination with local degradable antibiotics can be used and is an encouraging new option, but should not been carried out twice. CONCLUSION: Whereas the gold standard in periprosthetic joint infection treatment of late infections remains the exchange of the prosthesis, salvage procedures should be considered in the cases of reduced life expectancy, several recurrences of the infection, patients having preference and negative host factors. In these cases, the appropriate salvage procedure can temporarily lead to remission of the infection and the possibility to maintain mobility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103165612023-07-04 Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection Gramlich, Yves Parvizi, Javad Arthroplasty Review BACKGROUND: In severe cases of periprosthetic joint infection involving negative host-dependent factors, individual-based decisions between a curative therapy vs. salvage procedure are necessary. We aimed to review salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection cases, where a gold standard of a curative two-stage exchange can no longer be achieved. The options of knee arthrodesis, amputation, persistent fistula (stable drainage), or a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in late-onset cases are discussed, including lifelong antibiotic suppression alone. METHODS: We focused on known salvage procedures for severe periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee, such as amputation, arthrodesis, antibiotic suppression, persistent fistula, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in late-stage infections, and the role of local antibiotics. The current literature regarding indications and outcomes was reviewed. RESULTS: Whereas a successful single-stage above-knee amputation can be a curative effort in younger patients, this is associated with limited outcome in older patients, as the proportion who receive an exoprosthesis leading to independent mobility is low. Therefore, arthrodesis using an intramedullary modular nail is an option for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday life mobility, when revision total knee arthroplasty is not an option. Carrying out a persistent fistula using a stable drainage system, as well as a lifelong antibiotic suppression therapy, can be an option, in cases where no other surgery is possible. Active clinical surveillance should then be carried out. A debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in combination with local degradable antibiotics can be used and is an encouraging new option, but should not been carried out twice. CONCLUSION: Whereas the gold standard in periprosthetic joint infection treatment of late infections remains the exchange of the prosthesis, salvage procedures should be considered in the cases of reduced life expectancy, several recurrences of the infection, patients having preference and negative host factors. In these cases, the appropriate salvage procedure can temporarily lead to remission of the infection and the possibility to maintain mobility. BioMed Central 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10316561/ /pubmed/37394449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00182-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Gramlich, Yves
Parvizi, Javad
Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title_full Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title_fullStr Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title_full_unstemmed Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title_short Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
title_sort enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37394449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00182-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gramlichyves enoughisenoughsalvageproceduresinsevereperiprostheticjointinfection
AT parvizijavad enoughisenoughsalvageproceduresinsevereperiprostheticjointinfection