Cargando…

Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment

AIM: Early assessment of patient preferences has the potential to support shared decisions in personalized precision medicine for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to assess treatment preferences of patients with RA (< 5 years) with previous experience of inadequa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bywall, Karin Schölin, Esbensen, Bente Appel, Heidenvall, Marie, Erlandsson, Inger, Lason, Marta, Hansson, Mats, Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y
_version_ 1785067742744805376
author Bywall, Karin Schölin
Esbensen, Bente Appel
Heidenvall, Marie
Erlandsson, Inger
Lason, Marta
Hansson, Mats
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
author_facet Bywall, Karin Schölin
Esbensen, Bente Appel
Heidenvall, Marie
Erlandsson, Inger
Lason, Marta
Hansson, Mats
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
author_sort Bywall, Karin Schölin
collection PubMed
description AIM: Early assessment of patient preferences has the potential to support shared decisions in personalized precision medicine for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to assess treatment preferences of patients with RA (< 5 years) with previous experience of inadequate response to first-line monotherapy. METHOD: Patients were recruited (March–June 2021) via four clinics in Sweden. Potential respondents (N = 933) received an invitation to answer a digital survey. The survey included an introductory part, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and demographic questions. Each respondent answered 11 hypothetical choice questions as part of the DCE. Patient preferences and preference heterogeneity were estimated using random parameter logit models and latent class analysis models. RESULTS: Patients (n = 182) assessed the most important treatment attributes out of physical functional capacity, psychosocial functional capacity, frequency of mild side effects and likelihood of severe side effects. In general, patients preferred a greater increase in functional capacity and decreased side effects. However, a substantial preference heterogeneity was identified with two underlying preference patterns. The most important attribute in the first pattern was the ‘likelihood of getting a severe side effect’. Physical functional capacity was the most important attribute in the second pattern. CONCLUSION: Respondents focused their decision-making mainly on increasing their physical functional capacity or decreasing the likelihood of getting a severe side effect. These results are highly relevant from a clinical perspective to strengthen communication in shared decision making by assessing patients’ individual preferences for benefits and risks in treatment discussions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103165882023-07-04 Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment Bywall, Karin Schölin Esbensen, Bente Appel Heidenvall, Marie Erlandsson, Inger Lason, Marta Hansson, Mats Johansson, Jennifer Viberg BMC Rheumatol Research Article AIM: Early assessment of patient preferences has the potential to support shared decisions in personalized precision medicine for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to assess treatment preferences of patients with RA (< 5 years) with previous experience of inadequate response to first-line monotherapy. METHOD: Patients were recruited (March–June 2021) via four clinics in Sweden. Potential respondents (N = 933) received an invitation to answer a digital survey. The survey included an introductory part, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and demographic questions. Each respondent answered 11 hypothetical choice questions as part of the DCE. Patient preferences and preference heterogeneity were estimated using random parameter logit models and latent class analysis models. RESULTS: Patients (n = 182) assessed the most important treatment attributes out of physical functional capacity, psychosocial functional capacity, frequency of mild side effects and likelihood of severe side effects. In general, patients preferred a greater increase in functional capacity and decreased side effects. However, a substantial preference heterogeneity was identified with two underlying preference patterns. The most important attribute in the first pattern was the ‘likelihood of getting a severe side effect’. Physical functional capacity was the most important attribute in the second pattern. CONCLUSION: Respondents focused their decision-making mainly on increasing their physical functional capacity or decreasing the likelihood of getting a severe side effect. These results are highly relevant from a clinical perspective to strengthen communication in shared decision making by assessing patients’ individual preferences for benefits and risks in treatment discussions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y. BioMed Central 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10316588/ /pubmed/37400929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bywall, Karin Schölin
Esbensen, Bente Appel
Heidenvall, Marie
Erlandsson, Inger
Lason, Marta
Hansson, Mats
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title_full Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title_fullStr Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title_full_unstemmed Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title_short Physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with RA (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized RA treatment
title_sort physical function and severe side effects matter most to patients with ra (< 5 years): a discrete choice experiment assessing preferences for personalized ra treatment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-023-00341-y
work_keys_str_mv AT bywallkarinscholin physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT esbensenbenteappel physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT heidenvallmarie physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT erlandssoninger physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT lasonmarta physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT hanssonmats physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment
AT johanssonjenniferviberg physicalfunctionandseveresideeffectsmattermosttopatientswithra5yearsadiscretechoiceexperimentassessingpreferencesforpersonalizedratreatment