Cargando…

Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID

BACKGROUND: Long COVID occurs in those infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whose symptoms persist or develop beyond the acute phase. We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms, functional disability, or pathological chan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodrow, Mirembe, Carey, Charles, Ziauddeen, Nida, Thomas, Rebecca, Akrami, Athena, Lutje, Vittoria, Greenwood, Darren C, Alwan, Nisreen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad233
_version_ 1785067763141705728
author Woodrow, Mirembe
Carey, Charles
Ziauddeen, Nida
Thomas, Rebecca
Akrami, Athena
Lutje, Vittoria
Greenwood, Darren C
Alwan, Nisreen A
author_facet Woodrow, Mirembe
Carey, Charles
Ziauddeen, Nida
Thomas, Rebecca
Akrami, Athena
Lutje, Vittoria
Greenwood, Darren C
Alwan, Nisreen A
author_sort Woodrow, Mirembe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long COVID occurs in those infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whose symptoms persist or develop beyond the acute phase. We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms, functional disability, or pathological changes in adults or children at least 12 weeks postinfection. METHODS: We searched key registers and databases from January 1, 2020 to November 2, 2021, limited to publications in English and studies with at least 100 participants. Studies in which all participants were critically ill were excluded. Long COVID was extracted as prevalence of at least 1 symptom or pathology, or prevalence of the most common symptom or pathology, at 12 weeks or later. Heterogeneity was quantified in absolute terms and as a proportion of total variation and explored across predefined subgroups (PROSPERO ID CRD42020218351). RESULTS: One hundred twenty studies in 130 publications were included. Length of follow-up varied between 12 weeks and 12 months. Few studies had low risk of bias. All complete and subgroup analyses except 1 had I(2) ≥90%, with prevalence of persistent symptoms range of 0%–93% (pooled estimate [PE], 42.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 6.8% to 87.9%). Studies using routine healthcare records tended to report lower prevalence (PE, 13.6%; PI, 1.2% to 68%) of persistent symptoms/pathology than self-report (PE, 43.9%; PI, 8.2% to 87.2%). However, studies systematically investigating pathology in all participants at follow up tended to report the highest estimates of all 3 (PE, 51.7%; PI, 12.3% to 89.1%). Studies of hospitalized cases had generally higher estimates than community-based studies. CONCLUSIONS: The way in which Long COVID is defined and measured affects prevalence estimation. Given the widespread nature of SARS-CoV-2 infection globally, the burden of chronic illness is likely to be substantial even using the most conservative estimates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103166942023-07-04 Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID Woodrow, Mirembe Carey, Charles Ziauddeen, Nida Thomas, Rebecca Akrami, Athena Lutje, Vittoria Greenwood, Darren C Alwan, Nisreen A Open Forum Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND: Long COVID occurs in those infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) whose symptoms persist or develop beyond the acute phase. We conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of persistent symptoms, functional disability, or pathological changes in adults or children at least 12 weeks postinfection. METHODS: We searched key registers and databases from January 1, 2020 to November 2, 2021, limited to publications in English and studies with at least 100 participants. Studies in which all participants were critically ill were excluded. Long COVID was extracted as prevalence of at least 1 symptom or pathology, or prevalence of the most common symptom or pathology, at 12 weeks or later. Heterogeneity was quantified in absolute terms and as a proportion of total variation and explored across predefined subgroups (PROSPERO ID CRD42020218351). RESULTS: One hundred twenty studies in 130 publications were included. Length of follow-up varied between 12 weeks and 12 months. Few studies had low risk of bias. All complete and subgroup analyses except 1 had I(2) ≥90%, with prevalence of persistent symptoms range of 0%–93% (pooled estimate [PE], 42.1%; 95% prediction interval [PI], 6.8% to 87.9%). Studies using routine healthcare records tended to report lower prevalence (PE, 13.6%; PI, 1.2% to 68%) of persistent symptoms/pathology than self-report (PE, 43.9%; PI, 8.2% to 87.2%). However, studies systematically investigating pathology in all participants at follow up tended to report the highest estimates of all 3 (PE, 51.7%; PI, 12.3% to 89.1%). Studies of hospitalized cases had generally higher estimates than community-based studies. CONCLUSIONS: The way in which Long COVID is defined and measured affects prevalence estimation. Given the widespread nature of SARS-CoV-2 infection globally, the burden of chronic illness is likely to be substantial even using the most conservative estimates. Oxford University Press 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10316694/ /pubmed/37404951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad233 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Major Article
Woodrow, Mirembe
Carey, Charles
Ziauddeen, Nida
Thomas, Rebecca
Akrami, Athena
Lutje, Vittoria
Greenwood, Darren C
Alwan, Nisreen A
Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title_full Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title_fullStr Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title_short Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Long COVID
title_sort systematic review of the prevalence of long covid
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad233
work_keys_str_mv AT woodrowmirembe systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT careycharles systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT ziauddeennida systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT thomasrebecca systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT akramiathena systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT lutjevittoria systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT greenwooddarrenc systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid
AT alwannisreena systematicreviewoftheprevalenceoflongcovid