Cargando…

Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013

Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa, Bianchi, Paulo Homem de Mello, Lobel, Alexandre Likier Steinberg, Peregrino, Pedro Felipe Magalhães, Piccinato, Carla de Azevedo, Podgaec, Sérgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31450256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693680
_version_ 1785067783442137088
author Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Bianchi, Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel, Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino, Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato, Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec, Sérgio
author_facet Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Bianchi, Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel, Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino, Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato, Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec, Sérgio
author_sort Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory for most countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in Latin America, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally comparable and sometimes higher than the European ones. In contrast, the safety of the treatment was higher in Europe, with lower rates of complications, especially multiple pregnancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103168062023-07-27 Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013 Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa Bianchi, Paulo Homem de Mello Lobel, Alexandre Likier Steinberg Peregrino, Pedro Felipe Magalhães Piccinato, Carla de Azevedo Podgaec, Sérgio Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To compare the Latin American and European assisted reproductive technology (ART) registries regarding data accessibility and quality, treatment utilization, effectiveness, safety, and quality of services. Methods We performed an ecological study using data from scientific publications of Latin American and European registries that report cycles initiated during 2013 (the most recent registries available until December of 2017). The summarized data are presented as frequencies, percentages, minimum-maximum values, and absolute numbers. Results Reporting clinics and cycle treatments were unevenly distributed between the participating countries for both registries, although access to ART is 15 times greater in Europe. In Latin America, individual services participate voluntarily reporting started cycles until cancellation, birth or miscarriage, while in Europe it varied among countries. It makes the data available from Latin America more uniform, although lesser representative when compared with European ones, given that reporting is compulsory for most countries. The cumulative live birth rate was better in Latin America. Female age, use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cycles with transfer of ≥ 3 embryos, as well as multiple pregnancy rates were greater in the Latin American Register of Assisted Reproduction (RLA, in the Portuguese acronym). Assisted reproductive technology complications, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, hemorrhage, and infections were also higher in Latin America, although they are extremely uncommon in both regions. Conclusion Both regions have points to improve in the quality of their reports. Latin America has produced a more uniform reporting, their clinical results are generally comparable and sometimes higher than the European ones. In contrast, the safety of the treatment was higher in Europe, with lower rates of complications, especially multiple pregnancies. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10316806/ /pubmed/31450256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693680 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Duarte-Filho, Oscar Barbosa
Bianchi, Paulo Homem de Mello
Lobel, Alexandre Likier Steinberg
Peregrino, Pedro Felipe Magalhães
Piccinato, Carla de Azevedo
Podgaec, Sérgio
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_full Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_fullStr Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_full_unstemmed Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_short Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013
title_sort assisted reproductive technologies in latin america and europe: a comparative analysis of reported databases for 2013
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31450256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693680
work_keys_str_mv AT duartefilhooscarbarbosa assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013
AT bianchipaulohomemdemello assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013
AT lobelalexandrelikiersteinberg assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013
AT peregrinopedrofelipemagalhaes assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013
AT piccinatocarladeazevedo assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013
AT podgaecsergio assistedreproductivetechnologiesinlatinamericaandeuropeacomparativeanalysisofreporteddatabasesfor2013