Cargando…

Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-resistant and locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Methods Patients with LACC who underwent surgery due to resistance to CRT between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Disease-free surviva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Topuz, Samet, Kaban, Alpaslan, Küçücük, Seden, Salihoglu, Yavuz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701459
_version_ 1785067798454599680
author Topuz, Samet
Kaban, Alpaslan
Küçücük, Seden
Salihoglu, Yavuz
author_facet Topuz, Samet
Kaban, Alpaslan
Küçücük, Seden
Salihoglu, Yavuz
author_sort Topuz, Samet
collection PubMed
description Objective To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-resistant and locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Methods Patients with LACC who underwent surgery due to resistance to CRT between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) related factors were analyzed. Results A total of 23 patients were included in the study and the median age was 51 years old. A total of 14 patients (60.8%) experienced recurrence; among these recurrences, 8 of them were local, 5 were distant, 1 was both distant and local. A total of 9 patients (39%) died. The Median DFS and OS durations were 15 and 32 months, respectively. A total of 17 patients (74%) had undergone simple hysterectomy, 4 (17%) radical hysterectomy, and 2 (9%) total pelvic exenteration. Postoperative grade 3 and 4 complications were seen in 12 patients (52%). Macroscopic tumor presence in the pathology specimen was associated with distant recurrence and positive surgical margins with local recurrence (Log-Rank test p = 0.029 and p = 0.048, respectively). The only factor associated with OS was surgical margin positivity (Log-Rank test p = 0.008). The type of surgery, grades 3 and 4 postoperative complications, brachytherapy, and tumor histology were not associated with recurrence. Conclusion In patients with LACC, hysterectomy is an option in the presence of a central residual tumor after CRT. However, the risk of grades 3 and 4 complications of performed surgery is high. The presence of macroscopic tumor in the pathology specimen and positive surgical margins are poor prognostic factors. The goal of the surgeon should be to achieve a negative surgical margin. It does not seem important if the surgery is simple or radical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103168692023-07-27 Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy? Topuz, Samet Kaban, Alpaslan Küçücük, Seden Salihoglu, Yavuz Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-resistant and locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Methods Patients with LACC who underwent surgery due to resistance to CRT between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) related factors were analyzed. Results A total of 23 patients were included in the study and the median age was 51 years old. A total of 14 patients (60.8%) experienced recurrence; among these recurrences, 8 of them were local, 5 were distant, 1 was both distant and local. A total of 9 patients (39%) died. The Median DFS and OS durations were 15 and 32 months, respectively. A total of 17 patients (74%) had undergone simple hysterectomy, 4 (17%) radical hysterectomy, and 2 (9%) total pelvic exenteration. Postoperative grade 3 and 4 complications were seen in 12 patients (52%). Macroscopic tumor presence in the pathology specimen was associated with distant recurrence and positive surgical margins with local recurrence (Log-Rank test p = 0.029 and p = 0.048, respectively). The only factor associated with OS was surgical margin positivity (Log-Rank test p = 0.008). The type of surgery, grades 3 and 4 postoperative complications, brachytherapy, and tumor histology were not associated with recurrence. Conclusion In patients with LACC, hysterectomy is an option in the presence of a central residual tumor after CRT. However, the risk of grades 3 and 4 complications of performed surgery is high. The presence of macroscopic tumor in the pathology specimen and positive surgical margins are poor prognostic factors. The goal of the surgeon should be to achieve a negative surgical margin. It does not seem important if the surgery is simple or radical. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10316869/ /pubmed/32107764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701459 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Topuz, Samet
Kaban, Alpaslan
Küçücük, Seden
Salihoglu, Yavuz
Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title_full Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title_fullStr Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title_short Is Surgical Treatment an Option for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Presence of Central Residual Tumor after Chemoradiotherapy?
title_sort is surgical treatment an option for locally advanced cervical cancer in the presence of central residual tumor after chemoradiotherapy?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32107764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701459
work_keys_str_mv AT topuzsamet issurgicaltreatmentanoptionforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinthepresenceofcentralresidualtumorafterchemoradiotherapy
AT kabanalpaslan issurgicaltreatmentanoptionforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinthepresenceofcentralresidualtumorafterchemoradiotherapy
AT kucucukseden issurgicaltreatmentanoptionforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinthepresenceofcentralresidualtumorafterchemoradiotherapy
AT salihogluyavuz issurgicaltreatmentanoptionforlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerinthepresenceofcentralresidualtumorafterchemoradiotherapy