Cargando…

Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective To compare surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence in terms of efficiency and complications. Data Sources We searched the MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases using the terms stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence and sling. Selection of Studi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Letícia Maria de, Dias, Marcia Maria, Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro, Haddad, Jorge Milhem, Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello, Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667184
_version_ 1785067811154952192
author Oliveira, Letícia Maria de
Dias, Marcia Maria
Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello
Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
author_facet Oliveira, Letícia Maria de
Dias, Marcia Maria
Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello
Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
author_sort Oliveira, Letícia Maria de
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence in terms of efficiency and complications. Data Sources We searched the MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases using the terms stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence and sling. Selection of Studies Forty-eight studies were selected, which amounted to a total of 6,881 patients with scores equal to or higher than 3 in the Jadad scale. Data Collection Each study was read by one of the authors, added to a standardized table and checked by a second author. We extracted data on intervention details, follow-up time, the results of treatment and adverse events. Data Synthesis Comparing retropubic versus transobturator slings, the former was superior for both objective (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.54) and subjective (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48) cures. Between minislings versus other slings, there was a difference favoring other slings for subjective cure (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39–0.86). Between pubovaginal sling versus Burch surgery, there was a difference for both objective (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.50–2.77) and subjective (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10–2.44) cures, favoring pubovaginal sling. There was no difference in the groups: midurethral slings versus Burch, pubovaginal sling versus midurethral slings, transobturator slings, minislings versus other slings (objective cure). Retropubic and pubovaginal slings are more retentionist. Retropubic slings have more bladder perforation, and transobturator slings, more leg and groin pain, neurological lesion and vaginal perforation. Conclusion Pubovaginal slings are superior to Burch colposuspension surgery but exhibit more retention. Retropubic slings are superior to transobturator slings, with more adverse events. Other slings are superior to minislings in the subjective aspect. There was no difference in the comparisons between midurethral slings versus Burch colposuspension surgery, pubovaginal versus midurethral slings, and inside-out versus outside-in transobturator slings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10316922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103169222023-07-27 Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Oliveira, Letícia Maria de Dias, Marcia Maria Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro Haddad, Jorge Milhem Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To compare surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence in terms of efficiency and complications. Data Sources We searched the MEDLINE and COCHRANE databases using the terms stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence and sling. Selection of Studies Forty-eight studies were selected, which amounted to a total of 6,881 patients with scores equal to or higher than 3 in the Jadad scale. Data Collection Each study was read by one of the authors, added to a standardized table and checked by a second author. We extracted data on intervention details, follow-up time, the results of treatment and adverse events. Data Synthesis Comparing retropubic versus transobturator slings, the former was superior for both objective (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.54) and subjective (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48) cures. Between minislings versus other slings, there was a difference favoring other slings for subjective cure (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39–0.86). Between pubovaginal sling versus Burch surgery, there was a difference for both objective (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.50–2.77) and subjective (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.10–2.44) cures, favoring pubovaginal sling. There was no difference in the groups: midurethral slings versus Burch, pubovaginal sling versus midurethral slings, transobturator slings, minislings versus other slings (objective cure). Retropubic and pubovaginal slings are more retentionist. Retropubic slings have more bladder perforation, and transobturator slings, more leg and groin pain, neurological lesion and vaginal perforation. Conclusion Pubovaginal slings are superior to Burch colposuspension surgery but exhibit more retention. Retropubic slings are superior to transobturator slings, with more adverse events. Other slings are superior to minislings in the subjective aspect. There was no difference in the comparisons between midurethral slings versus Burch colposuspension surgery, pubovaginal versus midurethral slings, and inside-out versus outside-in transobturator slings. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10316922/ /pubmed/30142667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667184 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oliveira, Letícia Maria de
Dias, Marcia Maria
Martins, Sérgio Brasileiro
Haddad, Jorge Milhem
Girão, Manoel João Batista Castello
Castro, Rodrigo de Aquino
Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10316922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30142667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667184
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveiraleticiamariade surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT diasmarciamaria surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinssergiobrasileiro surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haddadjorgemilhem surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT giraomanoeljoaobatistacastello surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT castrorodrigodeaquino surgicaltreatmentforstressurinaryincontinenceinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis