Cargando…
Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update
The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice in surgical techniques for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer surgery worldwide and to compare the results to the previous surveys in 2007 and 2014. An online survey was sent out among surgical members of the International Socie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac099 |
_version_ | 1785067821983596544 |
---|---|
author | de Groot, E M Goense, L Kingma, B F Haverkamp, L Ruurda, J P van Hillegersberg, R |
author_facet | de Groot, E M Goense, L Kingma, B F Haverkamp, L Ruurda, J P van Hillegersberg, R |
author_sort | de Groot, E M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice in surgical techniques for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer surgery worldwide and to compare the results to the previous surveys in 2007 and 2014. An online survey was sent out among surgical members of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, the World Organization for Specialized Studies on Disease of the Esophagus, the International Gastric Cancer Association, the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and Dutch gastroesophageal surgeons via the network of the investigators. In total, 260 surgeons completed the survey representing 52 countries and 6 continents; Europe 56%, Oceania 14%, Asia 14%, South-America 9%, North-America 7%. Of the responding surgeons, 39% worked in a hospital that performed >51 esophagectomies per year. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy was the preferred technique (53%) followed by hybrid esophagectomy (26%) of which 7% consisted of a minimally invasive thoracic phase and 19% of a minimally invasive abdominal phase. Total open esophagectomy was preferred by 21% of the respondents. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy was significantly more often performed in high-volume centers compared with non-high-volume centers (P = 0.002). Robotic assistance was used in 13% during the thoracic phase and 6% during the abdominal phase. Minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy has become the preferred approach for esophagectomy. Although 21% of the surgeons prefer an open approach, 26% of the surgeons perform a hybrid procedure which may reflect further transition towards the use of total minimally invasive esophagectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10317002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103170022023-07-04 Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update de Groot, E M Goense, L Kingma, B F Haverkamp, L Ruurda, J P van Hillegersberg, R Dis Esophagus Original Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice in surgical techniques for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer surgery worldwide and to compare the results to the previous surveys in 2007 and 2014. An online survey was sent out among surgical members of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, the World Organization for Specialized Studies on Disease of the Esophagus, the International Gastric Cancer Association, the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland and Dutch gastroesophageal surgeons via the network of the investigators. In total, 260 surgeons completed the survey representing 52 countries and 6 continents; Europe 56%, Oceania 14%, Asia 14%, South-America 9%, North-America 7%. Of the responding surgeons, 39% worked in a hospital that performed >51 esophagectomies per year. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy was the preferred technique (53%) followed by hybrid esophagectomy (26%) of which 7% consisted of a minimally invasive thoracic phase and 19% of a minimally invasive abdominal phase. Total open esophagectomy was preferred by 21% of the respondents. Total minimally invasive esophagectomy was significantly more often performed in high-volume centers compared with non-high-volume centers (P = 0.002). Robotic assistance was used in 13% during the thoracic phase and 6% during the abdominal phase. Minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy has become the preferred approach for esophagectomy. Although 21% of the surgeons prefer an open approach, 26% of the surgeons perform a hybrid procedure which may reflect further transition towards the use of total minimally invasive esophagectomy. Oxford University Press 2023-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10317002/ /pubmed/36636763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac099 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Groot, E M Goense, L Kingma, B F Haverkamp, L Ruurda, J P van Hillegersberg, R Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title | Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title_full | Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title_fullStr | Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title_short | Trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
title_sort | trends in surgical techniques for the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: the 2022 update |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36636763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doac099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degrootem trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update AT goensel trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update AT kingmabf trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update AT haverkampl trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update AT ruurdajp trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update AT vanhillegersbergr trendsinsurgicaltechniquesforthetreatmentofesophagealandgastroesophagealjunctioncancerthe2022update |