Cargando…
Evidence from UK Research Ethics Committee members on what makes a good research ethics review, and what can be improved
The rapid development of vaccines and other innovative medical technologies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic required streamlined and efficient ethics and governance processes. In the UK the Health Research Authority (HRA) oversees and coordinates a number of the relevant research governance pro...
Autores principales: | Sidaway, Mark, Collett, Clive, Kolstoe, Simon Erik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317218/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288083 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
por: Begum, Rasheda, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Ethics committee member: Reviewing the ‘Ethics’ in clinical research
por: Tripathi, Raakhi
Publicado: (2013) -
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk — a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members
por: Kolstoe, Simon E., et al.
Publicado: (2023)