Cargando…
Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative approach for myelofibrosis patients, but relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. We investigated the effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in 37 patients with molecular (n = 17) or hematological relapse (n = 20) after HCT. Patients re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000921 |
_version_ | 1785067881672736768 |
---|---|
author | Gagelmann, Nico Wolschke, Christine Badbaran, Anita Janson, Dietlinde Berger, Carolina Klyuchnikov, Evgeny Ayuk, Francis Fehse, Boris Kröger, Nicolaus |
author_facet | Gagelmann, Nico Wolschke, Christine Badbaran, Anita Janson, Dietlinde Berger, Carolina Klyuchnikov, Evgeny Ayuk, Francis Fehse, Boris Kröger, Nicolaus |
author_sort | Gagelmann, Nico |
collection | PubMed |
description | Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative approach for myelofibrosis patients, but relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. We investigated the effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in 37 patients with molecular (n = 17) or hematological relapse (n = 20) after HCT. Patients received median of 2 (range, 1–5) cumulative DLI (total of 91 infusions). Median starting dose was 1 × 10(6) cells/kg, escalated by half-log ≥6 weeks if no response nor graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) occurred. Median time to first DLI was 40 weeks for molecular relapse versus 145 weeks for hematological relapse. Overall molecular complete response (mCR) at any time was 73% (n = 27) and was significantly higher for initial molecular relapse (88%) versus hematological relapse (60%; P = 0.05). The 6-year overall survival was 77% versus 32% (P = 0.03). Acute GvHD 2–4 occurred in 22% and half of the patients achieved mCR without any GvHD. All patients who relapsed from mCR achieved after first DLI could be salvaged with subsequent DLI, showing long-term survival. No second HCT was needed for molecular relapse versus 6 for hematological relapse. This comprehensive and largest study to date suggests molecular monitoring together with DLI as standard of care and a crucial approach to achieve excellent outcomes in relapsed myelofibrosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10317484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103174842023-07-04 Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Gagelmann, Nico Wolschke, Christine Badbaran, Anita Janson, Dietlinde Berger, Carolina Klyuchnikov, Evgeny Ayuk, Francis Fehse, Boris Kröger, Nicolaus Hemasphere Article Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative approach for myelofibrosis patients, but relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. We investigated the effect of donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in 37 patients with molecular (n = 17) or hematological relapse (n = 20) after HCT. Patients received median of 2 (range, 1–5) cumulative DLI (total of 91 infusions). Median starting dose was 1 × 10(6) cells/kg, escalated by half-log ≥6 weeks if no response nor graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) occurred. Median time to first DLI was 40 weeks for molecular relapse versus 145 weeks for hematological relapse. Overall molecular complete response (mCR) at any time was 73% (n = 27) and was significantly higher for initial molecular relapse (88%) versus hematological relapse (60%; P = 0.05). The 6-year overall survival was 77% versus 32% (P = 0.03). Acute GvHD 2–4 occurred in 22% and half of the patients achieved mCR without any GvHD. All patients who relapsed from mCR achieved after first DLI could be salvaged with subsequent DLI, showing long-term survival. No second HCT was needed for molecular relapse versus 6 for hematological relapse. This comprehensive and largest study to date suggests molecular monitoring together with DLI as standard of care and a crucial approach to achieve excellent outcomes in relapsed myelofibrosis. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10317484/ /pubmed/37404772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000921 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Gagelmann, Nico Wolschke, Christine Badbaran, Anita Janson, Dietlinde Berger, Carolina Klyuchnikov, Evgeny Ayuk, Francis Fehse, Boris Kröger, Nicolaus Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title | Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title_full | Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title_short | Donor Lymphocyte Infusion and Molecular Monitoring for Relapsed Myelofibrosis After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation |
title_sort | donor lymphocyte infusion and molecular monitoring for relapsed myelofibrosis after hematopoietic cell transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37404772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagelmannnico donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT wolschkechristine donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT badbarananita donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT jansondietlinde donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT bergercarolina donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT klyuchnikovevgeny donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT ayukfrancis donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT fehseboris donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation AT krogernicolaus donorlymphocyteinfusionandmolecularmonitoringforrelapsedmyelofibrosisafterhematopoieticcelltransplantation |