Cargando…

A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis

AIMS: Dead-space management, following dead bone resection, is an important element of successful chronic osteomyelitis treatment. This study compared two different biodegradable antibiotic carriers used for dead-space management, and reviewed clinical and radiological outcomes. All cases underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Jamie, Bourget-Murray, Jonathan, Stubbs, David, McNally, Martin, Hotchen, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.127.BJR-2022-0305.R2
_version_ 1785067894941417472
author Ferguson, Jamie
Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Stubbs, David
McNally, Martin
Hotchen, Andrew J.
author_facet Ferguson, Jamie
Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Stubbs, David
McNally, Martin
Hotchen, Andrew J.
author_sort Ferguson, Jamie
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Dead-space management, following dead bone resection, is an important element of successful chronic osteomyelitis treatment. This study compared two different biodegradable antibiotic carriers used for dead-space management, and reviewed clinical and radiological outcomes. All cases underwent single-stage surgery and had a minimum one-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 179 patients received preformed calcium sulphate pellets containing 4% tobramycin (Group OT), and 180 patients had an injectable calcium sulphate/nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite ceramic containing gentamicin (Group CG). Outcome measures were infection recurrence, wound leakage, and subsequent fracture involving the treated segment. Bone-void filling was assessed radiologically at a minimum of six months post-surgery. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.2 to 5.4; range 1.3 to 10.5) in Group OT compared to 4.9 years (IQR 2.1 to 6.0; range 1.0 to 8.3) in Group CG. The groups had similar defect sizes following excision (both mean 10.9 cm(3) (1 to 30)). Infection recurrence was higher in Group OT (20/179 (11.2%) vs 8/180 (4.4%), p = 0.019) than Group CG, as was early wound leakage (33/179 (18.4%) vs 18/180 (10.0%), p = 0.024) and subsequent fracture (11/179 (6.1%) vs 1.7% (3/180), p = 0.032). Group OT cases had an odds ratio 2.9-times higher of developing any one of these complications, compared to Group CG (95% confidence interval 1.74 to 4.81, p < 0.001). The mean bone-void healing in Group CG was better than in Group OT, in those with ≥ six-month radiological follow-up (73.9% vs 40.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Local antibiotic carrier choice affects outcome in chronic osteomyelitis surgery. A biphasic injectable carrier with a slower dissolution time was associated with better radiological and clinical outcomes compared to a preformed calcium sulphate pellet carrier. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(7):412–422.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10317575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103175752023-07-04 A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis Ferguson, Jamie Bourget-Murray, Jonathan Stubbs, David McNally, Martin Hotchen, Andrew J. Bone Joint Res Biomaterials AIMS: Dead-space management, following dead bone resection, is an important element of successful chronic osteomyelitis treatment. This study compared two different biodegradable antibiotic carriers used for dead-space management, and reviewed clinical and radiological outcomes. All cases underwent single-stage surgery and had a minimum one-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 179 patients received preformed calcium sulphate pellets containing 4% tobramycin (Group OT), and 180 patients had an injectable calcium sulphate/nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite ceramic containing gentamicin (Group CG). Outcome measures were infection recurrence, wound leakage, and subsequent fracture involving the treated segment. Bone-void filling was assessed radiologically at a minimum of six months post-surgery. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 4.6 years (interquartile range (IQR) 3.2 to 5.4; range 1.3 to 10.5) in Group OT compared to 4.9 years (IQR 2.1 to 6.0; range 1.0 to 8.3) in Group CG. The groups had similar defect sizes following excision (both mean 10.9 cm(3) (1 to 30)). Infection recurrence was higher in Group OT (20/179 (11.2%) vs 8/180 (4.4%), p = 0.019) than Group CG, as was early wound leakage (33/179 (18.4%) vs 18/180 (10.0%), p = 0.024) and subsequent fracture (11/179 (6.1%) vs 1.7% (3/180), p = 0.032). Group OT cases had an odds ratio 2.9-times higher of developing any one of these complications, compared to Group CG (95% confidence interval 1.74 to 4.81, p < 0.001). The mean bone-void healing in Group CG was better than in Group OT, in those with ≥ six-month radiological follow-up (73.9% vs 40.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Local antibiotic carrier choice affects outcome in chronic osteomyelitis surgery. A biphasic injectable carrier with a slower dissolution time was associated with better radiological and clinical outcomes compared to a preformed calcium sulphate pellet carrier. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(7):412–422. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2023-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10317575/ /pubmed/37400090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.127.BJR-2022-0305.R2 Text en © 2023 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/TDM Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives (CC BY-ND 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/), which permits the reuse of the work for any purpose, including commercially, provided the original author and source are credited; however, it cannot be distributed to others in any adapted form.
spellingShingle Biomaterials
Ferguson, Jamie
Bourget-Murray, Jonathan
Stubbs, David
McNally, Martin
Hotchen, Andrew J.
A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title_full A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title_fullStr A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title_short A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
title_sort comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between two different biodegradable local antibiotic carriers used in the single-stage surgical management of long bone osteomyelitis
topic Biomaterials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37400090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.127.BJR-2022-0305.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusonjamie acomparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT bourgetmurrayjonathan acomparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT stubbsdavid acomparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT mcnallymartin acomparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT hotchenandrewj acomparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT fergusonjamie comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT bourgetmurrayjonathan comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT stubbsdavid comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT mcnallymartin comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis
AT hotchenandrewj comparisonofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesbetweentwodifferentbiodegradablelocalantibioticcarriersusedinthesinglestagesurgicalmanagementoflongboneosteomyelitis