Cargando…

Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of alkasite with nanofilled resin composite restorations for occlusal caries lesions in permanent molar teeth of children, at one-year follow-up. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design, 38 children aged 7...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, H., Suprabha, B. S., Shenoy, R., Rao, A., Kotian, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00788-0
_version_ 1785067914938810368
author Sharma, H.
Suprabha, B. S.
Shenoy, R.
Rao, A.
Kotian, H.
author_facet Sharma, H.
Suprabha, B. S.
Shenoy, R.
Rao, A.
Kotian, H.
author_sort Sharma, H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of alkasite with nanofilled resin composite restorations for occlusal caries lesions in permanent molar teeth of children, at one-year follow-up. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design, 38 children aged 7–13 years with occlusal caries lesions on 59 first permanent molars were randomly allocated into two groups, Group 1: Filtek™ Z350XT (nanocomposite) and Group 2: Cention N(®) (alkasite resin composite). The restorations were evaluated at one year using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: All restorations had either Alpha or Bravo scores at one-year follow-up. In Group 1, all restorations scored Alpha, while one restoration each (3.6%) in Group 2 scored Bravo for fracture and marginal adaptation. All restorations in both groups scored Alpha for retention, secondary caries, and post-operative sensitivity. For anatomic form, all restorations in Group 1 scored Alpha, while three (10.7%) restorations in Group 2 had Bravo scores. For marginal discolouration, three restorations in both groups scored Bravo (11.5% and 10.7%, respectively). For surface roughness, one restoration (3.8%) in Group 1 and three restorations in Group 2 (10.7%) scored Bravo. The comparative results between the two groups for all the variables in the USPHS criteria were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The performances of the nanofilled composite and alkasite were clinically acceptable and comparable. Alkasite can be an alternative material for the restoration of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars of children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI Reg no: CTRI/2020/12/029830 Dated: 15/12/2020).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10317863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103178632023-07-05 Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial Sharma, H. Suprabha, B. S. Shenoy, R. Rao, A. Kotian, H. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Original Scientific Article PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of alkasite with nanofilled resin composite restorations for occlusal caries lesions in permanent molar teeth of children, at one-year follow-up. METHODS: In this randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design, 38 children aged 7–13 years with occlusal caries lesions on 59 first permanent molars were randomly allocated into two groups, Group 1: Filtek™ Z350XT (nanocomposite) and Group 2: Cention N(®) (alkasite resin composite). The restorations were evaluated at one year using the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. Data were analyzed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: All restorations had either Alpha or Bravo scores at one-year follow-up. In Group 1, all restorations scored Alpha, while one restoration each (3.6%) in Group 2 scored Bravo for fracture and marginal adaptation. All restorations in both groups scored Alpha for retention, secondary caries, and post-operative sensitivity. For anatomic form, all restorations in Group 1 scored Alpha, while three (10.7%) restorations in Group 2 had Bravo scores. For marginal discolouration, three restorations in both groups scored Bravo (11.5% and 10.7%, respectively). For surface roughness, one restoration (3.8%) in Group 1 and three restorations in Group 2 (10.7%) scored Bravo. The comparative results between the two groups for all the variables in the USPHS criteria were not statistically significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The performances of the nanofilled composite and alkasite were clinically acceptable and comparable. Alkasite can be an alternative material for the restoration of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars of children. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The clinical trial was registered at Clinical Trials Registry—India (CTRI Reg no: CTRI/2020/12/029830 Dated: 15/12/2020). Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10317863/ /pubmed/36947344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00788-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Scientific Article
Sharma, H.
Suprabha, B. S.
Shenoy, R.
Rao, A.
Kotian, H.
Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title_full Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title_short Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
title_sort clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36947344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40368-023-00788-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmah clinicaleffectivenessofalkasiteversusnanofilledresincompositeintherestorationofocclusalcariouslesionsinpermanentmolarteethofchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT suprabhabs clinicaleffectivenessofalkasiteversusnanofilledresincompositeintherestorationofocclusalcariouslesionsinpermanentmolarteethofchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shenoyr clinicaleffectivenessofalkasiteversusnanofilledresincompositeintherestorationofocclusalcariouslesionsinpermanentmolarteethofchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT raoa clinicaleffectivenessofalkasiteversusnanofilledresincompositeintherestorationofocclusalcariouslesionsinpermanentmolarteethofchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kotianh clinicaleffectivenessofalkasiteversusnanofilledresincompositeintherestorationofocclusalcariouslesionsinpermanentmolarteethofchildrenarandomizedclinicaltrial