Cargando…

Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compared the frequency of hypoglycaemia, time to hypoglycaemia and recovery from hypoglycaemia after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100. Furthermore, the symptomatic and counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemia wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieber, Thomas R., Arfelt, Kristine N., Cailleteau, Roman, Hart, Marlies, Kar, Soumitra, Mursic, Ines, Svehlikova, Eva, Urschitz, Martina, Haahr, Hanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05921-8
_version_ 1785067920542400512
author Pieber, Thomas R.
Arfelt, Kristine N.
Cailleteau, Roman
Hart, Marlies
Kar, Soumitra
Mursic, Ines
Svehlikova, Eva
Urschitz, Martina
Haahr, Hanne
author_facet Pieber, Thomas R.
Arfelt, Kristine N.
Cailleteau, Roman
Hart, Marlies
Kar, Soumitra
Mursic, Ines
Svehlikova, Eva
Urschitz, Martina
Haahr, Hanne
author_sort Pieber, Thomas R.
collection PubMed
description AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compared the frequency of hypoglycaemia, time to hypoglycaemia and recovery from hypoglycaemia after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100. Furthermore, the symptomatic and counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemia were compared between icodec and glargine U100 treatment. METHODS: In a randomised, single-centre (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria), open-label, two-period crossover trial, individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 18–72 years, BMI 18.5–37.9 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) ≤75 mmol/mol [≤9.0%]) treated with basal insulin with or without oral glucose-lowering drugs received once-weekly icodec (for 6 weeks) and once-daily glargine U100 (for 11 days). Total weekly doses were equimolar based on individual titration of daily glargine U100 during the run-in period (target fasting plasma glucose [PG]: 4.4–7.2 mmol/l). Randomisation was carried out by assigning a randomisation number to each participant in ascending order, which encoded to one of two treatment sequences via a randomisation list prepared prior to the start of the trial. At steady state, double and triple doses of icodec and glargine U100 were administered followed by hypoglycaemia induction: first, euglycaemia was maintained at 5.5 mmol/l by variable i.v. infusion of glucose; glucose infusion was then terminated, allowing PG to decrease to no less than 2.5 mmol/l (target PG(nadir)). The PG(nadir) was maintained for 15 min. Euglycaemia was restored by constant i.v. glucose (5.5 mg kg(−1) min(−1)). Hypoglycaemic symptoms score (HSS), counterregulatory hormones, vital signs and cognitive function were assessed at predefined PG levels towards the PG(nadir). RESULTS: Hypoglycaemia induction was initiated in 43 and 42 participants after double dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively, and in 38 and 40 participants after triple doses, respectively. Clinically significant hypoglycaemia, defined as PG(nadir) <3.0 mmol/l, occurred in comparable proportions of individuals treated with icodec vs glargine U100 after double (17 [39.5%] vs 15 [35.7%]; p=0.63) and triple (20 [52.6%] vs 28 [70.0%]; p=0.14) doses. No statistically significant treatment differences were observed in the time to decline from PG values of 5.5 mmol/l to 3.0 mmol/l (2.9–4.5 h after double dose and 2.2–2.4 h after triple dose of the insulin products). The proportion of participants with PG(nadir) ≤2.5 mmol/l was comparable between treatments after double dose (2 [4.7%] for icodec vs 3 [7.1%] for glargine U100; p=0.63) but higher for glargine U100 after triple dose (1 [2.6%] vs 10 [25.0%]; p=0.03). Recovery from hypoglycaemia by constant i.v. glucose infusion took <30 min for all treatments. Analyses of the physiological response to hypoglycaemia only included data from participants with PG(nadir) <3.0 mmol/l and/or the presence of hypoglycaemic symptoms; in total 20 (46.5%) and 19 (45.2%) individuals were included after a double dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively, and 20 (52.6%) and 29 (72.5%) individuals were included after a triple dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively. All counterregulatory hormones (glucagon, adrenaline [epinephrine], noradrenaline [norepinephrine], cortisol and growth hormone) increased during hypoglycaemia induction with both insulin products at both doses. Following triple doses, the hormone response was greater with icodec vs glargine U100 for adrenaline at PG(3.0 mmol/l) (treatment ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.69, 3.82]; p<0.001), and cortisol at PG(3.0) (mmol/l) (treatment ratio 1.64 [95% CI 1.13, 2.38]; p=0.01) and PG(nadir) (treatment ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.09, 2.97]; p=0.02). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in the HSS, vital signs and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Double or triple doses of once-weekly icodec lead to a similar risk of hypoglycaemia compared with double or triple doses of once-daily glargine U100. During hypoglycaemia, comparable symptomatic and moderately greater endocrine responses are elicited by icodec vs glargine U100. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03945656. FUNDING: This study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-023-05921-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10317887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103178872023-07-05 Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial Pieber, Thomas R. Arfelt, Kristine N. Cailleteau, Roman Hart, Marlies Kar, Soumitra Mursic, Ines Svehlikova, Eva Urschitz, Martina Haahr, Hanne Diabetologia Extended Article AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study compared the frequency of hypoglycaemia, time to hypoglycaemia and recovery from hypoglycaemia after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100. Furthermore, the symptomatic and counterregulatory responses to hypoglycaemia were compared between icodec and glargine U100 treatment. METHODS: In a randomised, single-centre (Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria), open-label, two-period crossover trial, individuals with type 2 diabetes (age 18–72 years, BMI 18.5–37.9 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) ≤75 mmol/mol [≤9.0%]) treated with basal insulin with or without oral glucose-lowering drugs received once-weekly icodec (for 6 weeks) and once-daily glargine U100 (for 11 days). Total weekly doses were equimolar based on individual titration of daily glargine U100 during the run-in period (target fasting plasma glucose [PG]: 4.4–7.2 mmol/l). Randomisation was carried out by assigning a randomisation number to each participant in ascending order, which encoded to one of two treatment sequences via a randomisation list prepared prior to the start of the trial. At steady state, double and triple doses of icodec and glargine U100 were administered followed by hypoglycaemia induction: first, euglycaemia was maintained at 5.5 mmol/l by variable i.v. infusion of glucose; glucose infusion was then terminated, allowing PG to decrease to no less than 2.5 mmol/l (target PG(nadir)). The PG(nadir) was maintained for 15 min. Euglycaemia was restored by constant i.v. glucose (5.5 mg kg(−1) min(−1)). Hypoglycaemic symptoms score (HSS), counterregulatory hormones, vital signs and cognitive function were assessed at predefined PG levels towards the PG(nadir). RESULTS: Hypoglycaemia induction was initiated in 43 and 42 participants after double dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively, and in 38 and 40 participants after triple doses, respectively. Clinically significant hypoglycaemia, defined as PG(nadir) <3.0 mmol/l, occurred in comparable proportions of individuals treated with icodec vs glargine U100 after double (17 [39.5%] vs 15 [35.7%]; p=0.63) and triple (20 [52.6%] vs 28 [70.0%]; p=0.14) doses. No statistically significant treatment differences were observed in the time to decline from PG values of 5.5 mmol/l to 3.0 mmol/l (2.9–4.5 h after double dose and 2.2–2.4 h after triple dose of the insulin products). The proportion of participants with PG(nadir) ≤2.5 mmol/l was comparable between treatments after double dose (2 [4.7%] for icodec vs 3 [7.1%] for glargine U100; p=0.63) but higher for glargine U100 after triple dose (1 [2.6%] vs 10 [25.0%]; p=0.03). Recovery from hypoglycaemia by constant i.v. glucose infusion took <30 min for all treatments. Analyses of the physiological response to hypoglycaemia only included data from participants with PG(nadir) <3.0 mmol/l and/or the presence of hypoglycaemic symptoms; in total 20 (46.5%) and 19 (45.2%) individuals were included after a double dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively, and 20 (52.6%) and 29 (72.5%) individuals were included after a triple dose of icodec and glargine U100, respectively. All counterregulatory hormones (glucagon, adrenaline [epinephrine], noradrenaline [norepinephrine], cortisol and growth hormone) increased during hypoglycaemia induction with both insulin products at both doses. Following triple doses, the hormone response was greater with icodec vs glargine U100 for adrenaline at PG(3.0 mmol/l) (treatment ratio 2.54 [95% CI 1.69, 3.82]; p<0.001), and cortisol at PG(3.0) (mmol/l) (treatment ratio 1.64 [95% CI 1.13, 2.38]; p=0.01) and PG(nadir) (treatment ratio 1.80 [95% CI 1.09, 2.97]; p=0.02). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in the HSS, vital signs and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Double or triple doses of once-weekly icodec lead to a similar risk of hypoglycaemia compared with double or triple doses of once-daily glargine U100. During hypoglycaemia, comparable symptomatic and moderately greater endocrine responses are elicited by icodec vs glargine U100. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03945656. FUNDING: This study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-023-05921-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10317887/ /pubmed/37308751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05921-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Extended Article
Pieber, Thomas R.
Arfelt, Kristine N.
Cailleteau, Roman
Hart, Marlies
Kar, Soumitra
Mursic, Ines
Svehlikova, Eva
Urschitz, Martina
Haahr, Hanne
Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title_full Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title_fullStr Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title_short Hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
title_sort hypoglycaemia frequency and physiological response after double or triple doses of once-weekly insulin icodec vs once-daily insulin glargine u100 in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial
topic Extended Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37308751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-023-05921-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pieberthomasr hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT arfeltkristinen hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT cailleteauroman hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT hartmarlies hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT karsoumitra hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT mursicines hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT svehlikovaeva hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT urschitzmartina hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT haahrhanne hypoglycaemiafrequencyandphysiologicalresponseafterdoubleortripledosesofonceweeklyinsulinicodecvsoncedailyinsulinglargineu100intype2diabetesarandomisedcrossovertrial