Cargando…

Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators

A circular economy (CE) is often seen as a promising way to address pressing environmental challenges, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. However, the CE concept remains contested, and the implementation of circular strategies (CS) does not automatically improve all d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulakovskaya, A., Knoeri, C., Radke, F., Blum, N. U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00190-w
_version_ 1785067922724487168
author Kulakovskaya, A.
Knoeri, C.
Radke, F.
Blum, N. U.
author_facet Kulakovskaya, A.
Knoeri, C.
Radke, F.
Blum, N. U.
author_sort Kulakovskaya, A.
collection PubMed
description A circular economy (CE) is often seen as a promising way to address pressing environmental challenges, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. However, the CE concept remains contested, and the implementation of circular strategies (CS) does not automatically improve all dimensions of sustainability. However, assessing the economic impacts of CS implementation is crucial to making the transition from linear to circular value chains. Despite the broad literature on CE indicators, a critical evaluation of economic CE indicators (eCEis) that conduct assessments on a value-chain level is still missing. This study addresses this gap by critically evaluating how capable eCEis are of measuring the economic impacts of implementing CS at the value-chain level. We first identify existing meso eCEis through a literature review, deriving a sample of 13 meso eCEis. We then qualitatively evaluate the eCEis based on criteria synthesised from requirements for CE indicators proposed in the literature. We find that existing meso eCEis only partly fulfil these criteria and consequently have limited capabilities for measuring the economic impacts of the implementation of CS at a value-chain level. The indicators largely satisfy the specific criteria diagnostic and useful, moderately satisfy the criterion practical, and barely satisfy the criteria systemic and transparent. We therefore recommend that future studies on eCEis place a stronger focus on adopting a systemic perspective, discuss their limitations and uncertainties in more detail, and consider combining meso eCEis with the indicators of other dimensions (environmental, social) and levels (micro, macro). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43615-022-00190-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10317896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103178962023-07-05 Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators Kulakovskaya, A. Knoeri, C. Radke, F. Blum, N. U. Circ Econ Sustain Review Paper A circular economy (CE) is often seen as a promising way to address pressing environmental challenges, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and resource depletion. However, the CE concept remains contested, and the implementation of circular strategies (CS) does not automatically improve all dimensions of sustainability. However, assessing the economic impacts of CS implementation is crucial to making the transition from linear to circular value chains. Despite the broad literature on CE indicators, a critical evaluation of economic CE indicators (eCEis) that conduct assessments on a value-chain level is still missing. This study addresses this gap by critically evaluating how capable eCEis are of measuring the economic impacts of implementing CS at the value-chain level. We first identify existing meso eCEis through a literature review, deriving a sample of 13 meso eCEis. We then qualitatively evaluate the eCEis based on criteria synthesised from requirements for CE indicators proposed in the literature. We find that existing meso eCEis only partly fulfil these criteria and consequently have limited capabilities for measuring the economic impacts of the implementation of CS at a value-chain level. The indicators largely satisfy the specific criteria diagnostic and useful, moderately satisfy the criterion practical, and barely satisfy the criteria systemic and transparent. We therefore recommend that future studies on eCEis place a stronger focus on adopting a systemic perspective, discuss their limitations and uncertainties in more detail, and consider combining meso eCEis with the indicators of other dimensions (environmental, social) and levels (micro, macro). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43615-022-00190-w. Springer International Publishing 2022-08-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10317896/ /pubmed/37408852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00190-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Paper
Kulakovskaya, A.
Knoeri, C.
Radke, F.
Blum, N. U.
Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title_full Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title_fullStr Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title_short Measuring the Economic Impacts of a Circular Economy: an Evaluation of Indicators
title_sort measuring the economic impacts of a circular economy: an evaluation of indicators
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37408852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43615-022-00190-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kulakovskayaa measuringtheeconomicimpactsofacirculareconomyanevaluationofindicators
AT knoeric measuringtheeconomicimpactsofacirculareconomyanevaluationofindicators
AT radkef measuringtheeconomicimpactsofacirculareconomyanevaluationofindicators
AT blumnu measuringtheeconomicimpactsofacirculareconomyanevaluationofindicators