Cargando…

Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights

OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection. METHODS: SCN distance relative to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wei-Ting, Mezian, Kamal, Naňka, Ondřej, Chen, Lan-Rong, Ricci, Vincenzo, Lin, Chih-Peng, Chang, Ke-Vin, Özçakar, Levent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0
_version_ 1785067927345561600
author Wu, Wei-Ting
Mezian, Kamal
Naňka, Ondřej
Chen, Lan-Rong
Ricci, Vincenzo
Lin, Chih-Peng
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
author_facet Wu, Wei-Ting
Mezian, Kamal
Naňka, Ondřej
Chen, Lan-Rong
Ricci, Vincenzo
Lin, Chih-Peng
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
author_sort Wu, Wei-Ting
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection. METHODS: SCN distance relative to the posterior superior iliac spines was measured and compared with ultrasound findings in asymptomatic volunteers. The CSA of the SCN, pressure-pain threshold, and pain measurements were obtained from asymptomatic controls and patients with SCN entrapment at various time points after hydrodissection (with 1 mL of 50% dextrose, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine, and 5 mL of 1% normal saline) in the short-axis view. RESULTS: Twenty sides of 10 formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The SCN locations on the iliac crest did not differ from the ultrasound findings in 30 asymptomatic volunteers. The average CSA of the SCN across different branches and sites ranged between 4.69–5.67 mm(2) and did not vary across different segments/branches or pain statuses. Initial treatment success was observed in 77.7% (n = 28) of 36 patients receiving hydrodissection due to SCN entrapment. A group with initial treatment success experienced symptom recurrence in 25% (n = 7) of cases, and those with recurrent pain had a higher prevalence of scoliosis than those without symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography effectively localizes SCN branches on the iliac crest, whereby increased nerve CSA is not useful for diagnosis. Most patients benefit from ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection; however, those with scoliosis may experience symptom recurrence and whether structured rehabilitation can reduce recurrence post-injection should be considered as one perspective in future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04478344). Registered on 20 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478344?cond=Superior+Cluneal+Nerve&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1. Critical relevance statement Ultrasound imaging accurately locates SCN branches on the iliac crest, while enlargement of the CSA is not useful in diagnosing SCN entrapment; however, approximately 80% of SCN entrapment cases respond positively to ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10317927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103179272023-07-05 Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights Wu, Wei-Ting Mezian, Kamal Naňka, Ondřej Chen, Lan-Rong Ricci, Vincenzo Lin, Chih-Peng Chang, Ke-Vin Özçakar, Levent Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: Low back pain is a prevalent public health issue caused by superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment. This study aimed to explore the course of SCN branches, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves, and effects of ultrasound-guided SCN hydrodissection. METHODS: SCN distance relative to the posterior superior iliac spines was measured and compared with ultrasound findings in asymptomatic volunteers. The CSA of the SCN, pressure-pain threshold, and pain measurements were obtained from asymptomatic controls and patients with SCN entrapment at various time points after hydrodissection (with 1 mL of 50% dextrose, 4 mL of 1% lidocaine, and 5 mL of 1% normal saline) in the short-axis view. RESULTS: Twenty sides of 10 formalin-fixed cadavers were dissected. The SCN locations on the iliac crest did not differ from the ultrasound findings in 30 asymptomatic volunteers. The average CSA of the SCN across different branches and sites ranged between 4.69–5.67 mm(2) and did not vary across different segments/branches or pain statuses. Initial treatment success was observed in 77.7% (n = 28) of 36 patients receiving hydrodissection due to SCN entrapment. A group with initial treatment success experienced symptom recurrence in 25% (n = 7) of cases, and those with recurrent pain had a higher prevalence of scoliosis than those without symptom recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography effectively localizes SCN branches on the iliac crest, whereby increased nerve CSA is not useful for diagnosis. Most patients benefit from ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection; however, those with scoliosis may experience symptom recurrence and whether structured rehabilitation can reduce recurrence post-injection should be considered as one perspective in future research. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04478344). Registered on 20 July 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478344?cond=Superior+Cluneal+Nerve&cntry=TW&draw=2&rank=1. Critical relevance statement Ultrasound imaging accurately locates SCN branches on the iliac crest, while enlargement of the CSA is not useful in diagnosing SCN entrapment; however, approximately 80% of SCN entrapment cases respond positively to ultrasound-guided dextrose hydrodissection. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0. Springer Vienna 2023-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10317927/ /pubmed/37395948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, Wei-Ting
Mezian, Kamal
Naňka, Ondřej
Chen, Lan-Rong
Ricci, Vincenzo
Lin, Chih-Peng
Chang, Ke-Vin
Özçakar, Levent
Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title_full Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title_fullStr Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title_short Enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
title_sort enhancing diagnosis and treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment: cadaveric, clinical, and ultrasonographic insights
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10317927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01463-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wuweiting enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT meziankamal enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT nankaondrej enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT chenlanrong enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT riccivincenzo enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT linchihpeng enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT changkevin enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights
AT ozcakarlevent enhancingdiagnosisandtreatmentofsuperiorclunealnerveentrapmentcadavericclinicalandultrasonographicinsights